"SAP is often used to provide audio tracks in languages other than the native language included in the program"
So where are SAPs 1-7
Last edited:
Unknown Artefact (or artifact) Community Thread - The Canonn
- Thread starter Yaffle
- Start date
- Status
"SAP is often used to provide audio tracks in languages other than the native language included in the program"
So where are SAPs 1-7
Thanks!
Most of us UA hunter are only getting in SSS since weeks.
So i can take this byside.
We salute you!
Or is it just an eight-track?
....no...please no.
Can anyone test for the subcarrier wave mentioned in this...
MTS features, including stereo and SAP, travel on subcarriers of the video carrier, much like color for television. It is not carried on the audio carrier in the manner of stereo sound for anFM radio broadcast however, as it only has a frequency deviation of ±25 kHz, whereas regular FM broadcasting has a deviation of ±75 kHz. The SAP subcarrier is located at 78.670 kHz, which is five times the 15.734 kHz corresponding to the MTS pilot signal. In turn, the MTS pilot is locked to the horizontal sync frequency of the video carrier for stability. The SAP channel contains mono audio which has been dbx-encoded for noise reduction, to improve the signal-to-noise ratio. The SAP audio has a bandpass from 60 Hz to 12 kHz, which is less than the "regular" audio channel which runs from 50 Hz to 15 kHz.
Its all starting to fall into place... the Thargoids have analogue TVs and 8 Track tape players.. they're from the '70s man! No wonder they're invading, they want our cable and mp3 players!
Last edited:
In short terms... you are saying you agree with DAYGOBAH?!?!?!?!??!?!?!
Maybe he has done just too much UA tests and all he wants to do is blowing this dayum thing up.
So to all the above quotes I say this: I did not mention the theory until now because I think of it as being wrong however people started saying about doing it and such, this does not mean I agree with daygobah as the reasoning and how to do it was wrong in my mind as with mine the purpose of it is to distrubute the plague by injecting it into stations or planet's atmospheres. But I have not tried it as it's a sacrifical theory and I knew that the reaction would be a lot worse.....I was also trying to hint a little towards it a few times by posting one post over and over again to no one seeming to really take notice. So just to clarify no I'm not doing the theory and I do not agree with daygobah.
they can survive maybe one nudge or two.....very risky though and shortens the time that your able to record drastically.
now back underground I go.
Last edited:
Rat I agree, destroying it may prove the UA's purpose but will not solve the UAs 'mystery', whatever the bloody hell that is.
My current conviction is that the audio will trigger some geeky-flashback and all will become clear:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfqOZlNxbfI
My current conviction is that the audio will trigger some geeky-flashback and all will become clear:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfqOZlNxbfI
You guys really hit my reputation and my cr balance! We are now at over 40 delivered legal "SAP 8" a 60K.
And in fact when they would be used to fullfill the shoot out "SAP 8" missions (Discret Redistribution) worth between 150-300K each.
Your sound experiments are much more expensive as ever dreamed
But what other should I do with my millions?
May the next holder request in game.
We salute you!
New Theory on what the ua is.
I was talking with another player about the space invaders idea and other things ua related and I have come up with a new origin theory.
I don't think the ua is a Thargoids object.
I believe that it belongs to a lost generation ship that set out in the distant past on a black op mission to test an experimental FSD drive and when they didn't report back, the power that be decided that it was a fail.
Over time the experiment was forgotten.
In reality the generation ship gathered resources as it went and developed new technologies
Over time during there journey, they designed and sent out the ua as a beacon.
But as they designed and built it during the trip no one recognises it as they haven't seen it before.
The federation had it in their convoys as they discovered the first one and are looking for more as like all governments they want new technologies for themselves, using the nee to know security mindset.
******
What I believe will happen when we decipher it.
We will find the location of the lost generation ship that has expanded into a new human power somewhere.
I was talking with another player about the space invaders idea and other things ua related and I have come up with a new origin theory.
I don't think the ua is a Thargoids object.
I believe that it belongs to a lost generation ship that set out in the distant past on a black op mission to test an experimental FSD drive and when they didn't report back, the power that be decided that it was a fail.
Over time the experiment was forgotten.
In reality the generation ship gathered resources as it went and developed new technologies
Over time during there journey, they designed and sent out the ua as a beacon.
But as they designed and built it during the trip no one recognises it as they haven't seen it before.
The federation had it in their convoys as they discovered the first one and are looking for more as like all governments they want new technologies for themselves, using the nee to know security mindset.
******
What I believe will happen when we decipher it.
We will find the location of the lost generation ship that has expanded into a new human power somewhere.
I just don't get it...
We've got an encoded signal with the station id broadcast in Morse code
I found an encoding system that hasn't been tested, that has the station id broadcast in morse code
And nobody is interested.....
???????????
We've got an encoded signal with the station id broadcast in Morse code
I found an encoding system that hasn't been tested, that has the station id broadcast in morse code
And nobody is interested.....
???????????
Oh so you were charging ur lazor? Makes sense now!
It's as plausible as many other theories, Mr Ratking the 15th
Why Morse then, though? And not something that the victims couldn't understand?
I tried it and blew up a sap 8, they are to fragile
Here's the video of this evening's main testing.
[video=youtube_share;3KGCwk_CiGk]http://youtu.be/3KGCwk_CiGk[/video]
(Sorry about the poor quality right now, YT is taking an age about the processing)
All tests conducted in the shadow of Sleipnir A 1 with Cmdr nilreb.
0:00 - 1:22 / Only UA. 5 purrs.
1:35 - 2:43 / UA + 8x SAP8. *3 purrs*
3:32 - 4:00 / UA + 6x SAP8. *3 purrs*
4:25 - 5:03 / UA + 5x SAP8. 5 purrs.
8:40 - 10:20 / UA + 6x SAP8. 5 purrs.
12:40 - 14:25 / UA + 7 SAP8. 5 purrs.
16:24 - 17:54 / UA + 8x SAP8. 5 purrs.
It seems that it takes 8x SAP8 near the UA to change the sound from 5 purrs between honks to 3 purrs.
Also, the UA must in within the "cloud" of SAP8s. If the distribution is too loose, the UA emits 5 purrs like normal.
Distribution of the SAP8 around the UA when it made 3 purrs.
The video stopped because I think it hit some file limit. I did some more listening with 8x SAP8 and tried nudging 2 of them closer, which didn't seem to make a difference.
I agree that 12x SAP8 in close proximity to a UA is the way to go with further testing. We need to work out exactly how far cargo drifts from the cargo hatch and get 2-3 people to try and drop SAP8s into a small area with a UA in the middle.
What I think this means though is that 8x SAP8 "activates" something about the UA.
One of the tests I'll be performing soon is travelling to Polaris and see if it makes a difference to entering the system (I'm not expecting to be able to). Confirm or deny, I'll find out.
I'm currently parked up in Leonard Nimoy Station btw.
[video=youtube_share;3KGCwk_CiGk]http://youtu.be/3KGCwk_CiGk[/video]
(Sorry about the poor quality right now, YT is taking an age about the processing)
All tests conducted in the shadow of Sleipnir A 1 with Cmdr nilreb.
0:00 - 1:22 / Only UA. 5 purrs.
1:35 - 2:43 / UA + 8x SAP8. *3 purrs*
3:32 - 4:00 / UA + 6x SAP8. *3 purrs*
4:25 - 5:03 / UA + 5x SAP8. 5 purrs.
8:40 - 10:20 / UA + 6x SAP8. 5 purrs.
12:40 - 14:25 / UA + 7 SAP8. 5 purrs.
16:24 - 17:54 / UA + 8x SAP8. 5 purrs.
It seems that it takes 8x SAP8 near the UA to change the sound from 5 purrs between honks to 3 purrs.
Also, the UA must in within the "cloud" of SAP8s. If the distribution is too loose, the UA emits 5 purrs like normal.
Distribution of the SAP8 around the UA when it made 3 purrs.
The video stopped because I think it hit some file limit. I did some more listening with 8x SAP8 and tried nudging 2 of them closer, which didn't seem to make a difference.
I agree that 12x SAP8 in close proximity to a UA is the way to go with further testing. We need to work out exactly how far cargo drifts from the cargo hatch and get 2-3 people to try and drop SAP8s into a small area with a UA in the middle.
What I think this means though is that 8x SAP8 "activates" something about the UA.
One of the tests I'll be performing soon is travelling to Polaris and see if it makes a difference to entering the system (I'm not expecting to be able to). Confirm or deny, I'll find out.
I'm currently parked up in Leonard Nimoy Station btw.
Here's the video of this evening's main testing.
http://youtu.be/3KGCwk_CiGk
(Sorry about the poor quality right now, YT is taking an age about the processing)
All tests conducted in the shadow of Sleipnir A 1 with Cmdr nilreb.
0:00 - 1:22 / Only UA. 5 purrs.
1:35 - 2:43 / UA + 8x SAP8. *3 purrs*
3:32 - 4:00 / UA + 6x SAP8. *3 purrs*
4:25 - 5:03 / UA + 5x SAP8. 5 purrs.
8:40 - 10:20 / UA + 6x SAP8. 5 purrs.
12:40 - 14:25 / UA + 7 SAP8. 5 purrs.
16:24 - 17:54 / UA + 8x SAP8. 5 purrs.
It seems that it takes 8x SAP8 near the UA to change the sound from 5 purrs between honks to 3 purrs.
Also, the UA must in within the "cloud" of SAP8s. If the distribution is too loose, the UA emits 5 purrs like normal.
Distribution of the SAP8 around the UA when it made 3 purrs.
The video stopped because I think it hit some file limit. I did some more listening with 8x SAP8 and tried nudging 2 of them closer, which didn't seem to make a difference.
I agree that 12x SAP8 in close proximity to a UA is the way to go with further testing. We need to work out exactly how far cargo drifts from the cargo hatch and get 2-3 people to try and drop SAP8s into a small area with a UA in the middle.
What I think this means though is that 8x SAP8 "activates" something about the UA.
One of the tests I'll be performing soon is travelling to Polaris and see if it makes a difference to entering the system (I'm not expecting to be able to). Confirm or deny, I'll find out.
I'm currently parked up in Leonard Nimoy Station btw.
call me crazy but...this cant be a coincidence.
the wiki entry to SAP and the fact that it changes the purrs...
it sounds too easy...easy enough to work but not too easy
I haven't quite followed this, long day too many beers at the end of it; you'll need to speak to me very slowly, what did you find?
And our women. Don't forget the women.
Seega Port is not infected, An UA expired and blew up right outside the front door.
The UA checks where it is. If not in the correct location, it simply self destructs.
Nothing happens if we take it to a plauge system because the job is already done.
That is how I would have made an advanced bio wepon,
We ned to find the next plauge system.
If thargoids want to make us weaker, they will target something of military importance. They are quite tactical.
Is ther something common between the plauge systems (all, not just the new)?
Also, is there something we are not told about these plauges? They don't seem all that dangerous.
The UA checks where it is. If not in the correct location, it simply self destructs.
Nothing happens if we take it to a plauge system because the job is already done.
That is how I would have made an advanced bio wepon,
We ned to find the next plauge system.
If thargoids want to make us weaker, they will target something of military importance. They are quite tactical.
Is ther something common between the plauge systems (all, not just the new)?
Also, is there something we are not told about these plauges? They don't seem all that dangerous.
- Status