Anyone seen the latest Galnet news? Namely, where's Walden? Think that could be a hint?
Im guessing its to do with this :
http://www.allenstroud.co.uk/2014/07/the-evolution-of-villain-doctor-hans.html
ah ninjad
Last edited:
Anyone seen the latest Galnet news? Namely, where's Walden? Think that could be a hint?
Sorry for the CAPS but I cannot use bold from mobile.
BTW I'm wondering if you've watched the video I'm talkin about, before replying: it is a first time in 4 months. Only one Purr, no bg sound. I'm not saying that the solution will be revealed only to a wing of four, but that something interesting could happen. And remember the UA came out together with Wings.
Whatch the video, please.
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/6qsf525u...view=Desktop+08.09.2015+-+19.33.03.17.DVR.mp4
This falls in with my theory that it's some sort of incubation chamber or cocoon for tharglets to mature. What if humanity is the "bacteria" that the thargoids want to destroy, and these pods are intended to be taken aboard stations / outposts / ships, where the tharglets emerge as thargoids and destroy the location?
Loose I know, in addition to the fact that based on the dark wheel, humanity is more than aware of tharglets, and as such would likely detect them before any "hatching" could happen.
As do I - or at least dark masses.
So how would that manifest?
1 - misjump into dark system. Method of triggering? Unknown, but all other attempts by brave CMDRs to do this have failed - so one would expect it simply to happen when carrying a UA. Most of the UAs are very well-travelled and it hasn't happened - so does this rule that idea out? I think so.
2 - New location on map available when UA stowed. Again, the things are well travelled and nobody's noticed anything like that yet... But... One wonders exactly how a CMDR is meant to know where to look on the map! Could be a place that definitely should be in a well-known place (from lore) but isn't, and only shows when you have UA onboard but also, possibly, when you're near the location. Lore-fiends? Any systems we can definitely place, relative to other locations we do have, that are missing?
3 - Picking up a new target in a system while in SC and UA stowed. I.e. the UA unlocks a previously hidden location from an ADS. Or, you have to re-do the ADS with it stowed for it to work. Again, though, we'd need likely systems to try this out.
4 - We come across a planet or other body in a system where it's name is 'unknown' or similar - I.e. where the standard system naming convention doesn't hold. Dropping the UA nearby might yield Morse for a proper name. Again, though - need likely system *and*, more importantly, no such body has been found by anyone ever that we know of.
5 - In some system or other (see above!) there is a substantial mass or other object the UA can identify that we cannot see. My biggest issue with this would be that there's nothing in the UA's behaviour that could read as a distance indicator, only identification - so at best all it could do is tell us there's something there that we can't see.
Have I missed anything? What do you guys think? Favourite ones from this list? Systems that should be visited based on this? Are our UA carriers willing to go on a stomp to a few places based on these ideas?
I've already suggested taking another good look in Soontill. Regardless of anything - it's an important location from lore, and a few of the ideas listed above could be carried out there reasonably easily![]()
Walden article could be set up for hidden bases which is going to be included in Horizon expansion.
You're asking the wrong two people, as neither of us have UAs (at least I don't).
.
Someone asked for "The Silent Song of the Spheres" missions... here's one ATM.
I'm thoroughly out of the loop with sap 8.
Have they been hit with every possible scanner yet?
Cargo
Frameshift wake
Kill warrent
Discovery
Surface
Switching ship scanner from logarithmic to linear (in functions tab)
Perhaps our hint from the devs is hidden within the sap 8 container.
I think in future it's probably worth having someone with a bit of experience pick these up.
Ideally they should go into storage if possible, perhaps on a second account?
Not being funny but if a big group of people have all contributed time and effort to a cause then it's not really fair to go messing round and lose it within a few hours because you're not up on the dangers. Yes I know accidents do happen but accidents are all too common with UAs and pretending they don't happen is going to result in repeatedly wasting everyone's time.
Crazy idea... what about the Alliance Redeemer beam laser? it only does heat damage to ships. Perhaps some heat might get it to "incubate" ?![]()
Sorry but, as it seems very important to me, I'm quoting myself and upping...
A wing of FOUR very very very close to the UA, listening. And something interesting will happen:
I'm almost sure that the purrs will disappear completely.
Sorry for the CAPS but I cannot use bold from mobile.
BTW I'm wondering if you've watched the video I'm talkin about, before replying: it is a first time in 4 months. Only one Purr, no bg sound. I'm not saying that the solution will be revealed only to a wing of four, but that something interesting could happen. And remember the UA came out together with Wings.
Whatch the video, please.
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/6qsf525u...view=Desktop+08.09.2015+-+19.33.03.17.DVR.mp4
They light up along the face and spin in orange/yellow when they make their roar or whatever you call it.
Has anyone recorded that in the dark, ie eclipsed behind a planet?
Best way to see the markings that light up
All right, I'm in. Add me as a friend ingame, commander name is the same - so we can chat when I'm online. Get us 2 other peeps and I'll bring Bob around.
Doh, man, I did and screamed. That photo sound just popped my ears (stupidly maxed out the volume of course so I would hear everything... well... I did... then not for a while)
There's not a single howl-cycle in that video that doesn't have something distracting in it.
Walden article could be set up for hidden bases which is going to be included in Horizon expansion.
Ha! I lol'd, this is a great idea! (of course it won't provide a solution for us as mentioned before, bc the solution had to be there in 1.2) Still, this is the kind of thinking we need here.
Err, sorry, ignore me. Misinterpreted what you were saying there, thought you meant DB had said we had found all the UAs. Deleted.
Second: DB said that we have already seen all the "canisters" to be found, however he expressed it. So finding something else that'd "unlock it" or something that'd be "unlocked by it" is highly unlikely (highly unlikely... highly unlikely... keep scrolling!... highly unlikely...)
It will be soon till Soontill is revisited. Soon.
Say that six times fast and see what happens to the UA. Sorry, couldn't resist.
The problem with all of these, except 1 perhaps, is that the thing eats away at your ship while you travel. So you'd best hope to find what you are looking for soon. Very soon. (heh heh get it?).
The other problem with all of these, except 1, is there are 400 billion systems to check. Without a lead, this is needle in a haystack time. And your ship will expire, with you in it, long before you find something.
My two preferences for trying it though are Soontill and Peregrina, if anyone wanted to give it a whirl. Or Sol and the search for Voyager(s). Wish upon a star, 400 billion of them, that I had a UA to try it with myself.
Edit: For this to work in all cases except 1 above, we would need to assume (there is that word again) that FD is letting the UA spawn only within a certain LY radius of the system or object the UA is supposed to find, based on how fast the UA deteriorates your systems. And that that rate of deterioration is a constant, particularly when applied to thrusters, FSD and power plant (and life support, and scanners). If we could time how long until thrusters or FSD systems were unusable, that would roughly give us the search radius as you could figure out how far you could go in a 40LY 'conda in that time. Add AMUs and maybe you could go a bit further perhaps, and that could be tested out too. Would narrow it down, but you would still be looking at 100s of systems to check, 1000s of planetary bodies.
Edit 2: Throw in the possibility of travelling in a Wing of four 'condas, and transferring the UA just before your systems die, and you are likely looking at a radius of a few thousand LY from point of origin. At least.
Absolutely right. Fwiw, if it's a location-based thing like this, then I don't think it's going to be a needle-in-a-haystack-kind of search for any of these ideas.
It'd have to be somewhere that has some logical, deductible connection, I think, because for the reasons you outline very well - it would be as near an impossible task as is possible to get!
Throw in the possibility of travelling in a Wing of four 'condas, and transferring the UA just before your systems die, and you are likely looking at a radius of a few thousand LY from point of origin. At least.
Does any one have a sap 8 core container they would kindly donate to me?I promise to include your name in the book I write when I solve this thing
Absolutely right. Fwiw, if it's a location-based thing like this, then I don't think it's going to be a needle-in-a-haystack-kind of search for any of these ideas.
It'd have to be somewhere that has some logical, deductible connection, I think, because for the reasons you outline very well - it would be as near an impossible task as is possible to get!