=bitstorm]The prediction is...
You will hear two purrs of varying high/low combinations that will never ever change.
And that if you nudge the UA and damage it, even just a little, it will suddenly switch to 5-6 purrs.
If the above is right and you are going to do a long recording, a recording with the 5-6 purrs would potentially be much more useful than a 2 purr recording.
The purrs will be 2 when you arrive, however much mass you put near it, the purrs will not decrease, or change, unless someone accidentally touches the UA at which point it'll move into a 5-6 purr cycle.
Now this is good science! A theory, with a testable prediction!
Oh aye!
The reason I say a continuous 5-6 purr recording is more valuable than the 2 purr is that, if the UA is 5 purring and purring means anything whatsoever, then that's where the message is.
Meaning if we can get a 20 minute 5-6 purr recording, (which still won't be ideal due to the numbers in the morse name obfuscating purrs) but if we get an extended recording then we have a huge continuous sample in which to look for a repeat.
Previsouly I've only been able to do 10 lots of 400 seconds, (more than an hour over separate deployments) and seen no repeats. That took me days to do and I don't want to have to do more just to increase the sample size, it's painful. =(
But with a continuously 5-6 purring UA, we have a UA that's (allegedly) messaging forever which really could increase the likelihood of us seeing any repeat ie where the message ends and restarts.
If it is nudged below 100 integrity it would be good to see what happens (if anything) at the 380-400 second mark after the nudge.
If that makes any sense whatsoever. =p