News Horizons Beta Delay to Monday 30th November

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Looks like it'll be worth the wait. Keep up the good work guys. We've come a long way from just a white circle on a black background.
 
Fear not; there will be no delay on the official release.

We took special measures to assure that this won't happen:

images.jpg
 
I have a burning question that I either missed the answer to OR did not get answered.

David had said that it was a good idea to start a new from new ground positions and I have seen many people even get excited to start anew. I have either misunderstood this or don't get it. I have worked too hard and put over a month of hours of solid solid trading (and i mean over 800 hours of playtime) to get my credits and ships. If I have to start anew I will probably quit this game. CAN ANYONE PLEASE EXPLAIN TO ME IF I CAN TRANSFER MY CREDITS AND SHIPS ONCE HORIZONS COMES OUT? can anyone also explain to me why is anyone excited to start anew? Simply not my cup of tea. Thanks for advance for any replies.

It is merely a procedure.

When testing, you may want to check the application with existing data (to see how it behave after the upgrade/update or after introducing new features), and with a clean state.

Since it is Beta, and your main state won't be affected; he probably just asked someone to wipe and start anew, so he has as many people as possible to try both case scenario.

At launch you will have nothing different from what you had the day before launch; the only difference is that now you can get on planets :) IF you want to restart, it is your call.
 
lolz you think barely a week delay is long being an alpha backer of this and SC I've been waiting for best part of 6months for Star marine ;) a week is a walk in the park ;)
 
Even more so "distance"... At the speed of light (as per Lorentz time dilation equation), time stops, so time is completely a non-factor and distance is therefore the only factor ;)


Edit: Doh! Ninja'd!
And even the distance is only a factor for an outside observer, who isn't moving at lightspeed.
And because lightspeed is limited, time comes relevant again (for the lower-than-light moving observer). ;)

Doesn't change the fact that a lightyear is a measure of distance, not measure of time. :)
 
Last edited:
And even the distance is only a factor for an outside observer, who isn't moving at lightspeed.
And because lightspeed is limited, time comes relevant again (for the lower-than-light moving observer). ;)

Doesn't change the fact that a lightyear is a measure of distance, not measure of time. :)

Okay - you've all blown my mind... Just coming out of it.

Yes, of course it is. But Time is not totally out of it. It is the distance that light travels in a particular time. In fact, time is the important factor, because the speed of light is not constant, hence the distance is variable!!!
 
Last edited:
The last few threads gave me a laugh (in a good way):).

I am quite happy to wait a few more days as I see no value in a rushed Beta with known game breaking issues, which would surly lead to even more moans.

Just don't make plans around projected not binding release dates:D.
 

Javert

Volunteer Moderator
Okay - you've all blown my mind... Just coming out of it.

Yes, of course it is. But Time is not totally out of it. It is the distance that light travels in a particular time. In fact, time is the important factor, because the speed of light is not constant, hence the distance is variable!!!

I'm not a physicist, but I don't think that's correct is it? The speed of light is generally held to be a constant (and not only that, but constant regardless of the frame of reference)?
 
Last edited:
Yes, of course it is. But Time is not totally out of it. It is the distance that light travels in a particular time. In fact, time is the important factor, because the speed of light is not constant, hence the distance is variable!!!
In reality, light does travel at different speeds in different materials, yes. But the definition of lightyear uses the maximum possible speed (by our current understanding), speed of light in vacuum, which is a constant.

Year = measurement of time, like hour or second.
Lightyear = measurement of distance, like kilometer or meter.

Veering way off-topic, apologies... :eek:
 
I'm not a physicist, but I don't think that's correct is it? The speed of light is generally held to be a constant?

Depending on what medium it is travelling through, light moves slower. The "Speed of Light" (i.e. c) that is commonly quoted is in fact "The speed of light in a vacuum" specifically because it does in fact slow down... which then means that it actually does have time to party, on occasions, like when passing through the waters of a swimming pool. Preferably a swimming pool in a hot country with Pina Coladas beeing sipped at the poolside than one of the Lidos in North London...
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom