If the pricing really is doing this - then it suggests a gentle nudge towards selling more, and over a wider area.
'They' (the mysterious 'them') want the malfunctions to spread more before we can look at solving them.
Or... If it's confirmed that having materials on ship does slow down the rate of corrosion - then I'd be looking for a way for us to stop ship corrosion altogether.
Solve that problem and, if the station malfunctions are indeed UA-caused (no doubts any more, surely) then it stands to reason the same thing would stop that too.
So if any CMDRs have the patience to continue playing with materials harvested from planets, storing then on-ship to see if the degradation rate genuinely is affected - that'd be much appreciated![]()
Those so called "malfunctions" might not be errors occuring in the stations at all.
I rather think of them as interactions between the UA and the datacore of the stations.
It even could require a dozen more to go "dark" so their data is updated, having every station have a
portion of the UA-Network data, requiring all computing power to decipher it.
In the end we might get a galaxy map with additional info served.
We oughta find out if the "going dark" is tied in to UA sales,
and if ships, docking with the station (interaction with the station database) are used
as messangers, trailblazing a "network" to other stations aswell.
If the "going dark" is not tied into UA sales there,
we might wanna keep track of the systems "infected",
in case this paints a picture/constellation or can be used as a code.
Last edited: