Read this.
While you are not required to stop selling artefacts, it comes as highly recommended advice from our head scientists.
Edit - the bold text is not anger - it's just signposting key points
It's a Catch-22 situation as far as I see it. Logically, if UAs cause the issues, then
if every CMDR stops selling, then the issues should stop spreading. But it might not,
if that's what the story requires of us. As I've said a couple of times - and as XDeath rightly pointed out - the Canonn recommended no longer selling them because it was prudent and fit with the identity of the group - especially on Galnet.
Once again I'm going to straddle the meta line here...
There's clearly a story here where the malfunctions spread - practically all the stations involved can be linked to CMDR activity but not all stations (consider JManis' own personal marathon

) that have been targeted have gone down. That still suggests a level of player involvement in determining the stations that have issues, but that there's some other 'trigger' (most likely FD choosing - it's just not possible that the BGS is allowed to do it on its own, evidenced by tests like JManis').
Questions remain over just how many UAs are needed to trigger it; Bond Hub in Varati - as I've said before - didn't have many UA sales before it started getting issues - there's a distinct feeling in me that FD chose it because of the Canonn; as it offered a nice angle to the story and our involvement in it (no - not massive ego on display here, it just makes sense).
If I were controlling the story I'd want a goodly amount of stations to be 'infected' before I moved it to the next phase.
So: it might just be that we should continue selling UAs to bring more stations down, purely to advance the story.
If we did, then we should do it
publicly, and
cooperatively, IMHO, involving as many player groups as possible. I personally am absolutely against undermining any groups - and with powers it all gets a bit 'icky' as well.
Our own Bond Hub, for example - the rest of the Council would need to 'okay' it - but I don't think we're that bothered if it gets shut down. I'm consulting with them now about another idea I've had which involves that station, and potentially more besides.
But:
Look at the Galnets - the engineers that are being quoted all talk about 'finding a solution'. We've tried rares, and that hasn't worked, but what if there is another solution that we just need to find? Like this potential 'damping effect' that materials might have. If a station is simply having issues, then you can experiment with it still. Once it gets shut down you can no longer affect it.
What if we can find a way right now to stop ship corrosion, and that that solution then means we can stop the station malfunctions? Perhaps more effort needs to be directed towards this, too.