UAs, Barnacles & More Thread 5 - The Canonn

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
That's pretty close, better than Barnard's Loop IMO. But if the logo is the LMC then what do we do with that info? We're never likely to be able to get there (the devs have pretty much ruled out adding other galaxies).

As another commander stated, the fact that aliens could come from another galaxy and not from our (that we ca actually visit, espacially barnads loop) leave them the ease to do as they want when they want.

May be we're not supposed to find something else as much significant as the barnacles until somthing happen (at obsidien? somewhere else?)

I don't know, yet =D
 
However, even the recent Galnet Posts are making direct connections between Barnacle and UA. What do weee need more? MB to tell you?

The Purrs are not only similar: they are exactly the same.

Which Galnet post? The only one I've noticed mentioning the UAs and barnacles was a Canonn issued one.

A connection between the UAs and the barnacles seems very likely but I wouldn't call it confirmed.
 
just been talking with fellow commanders about the meta-alloys, what if they are like stem cells, hear me out on this. The alloys are programmable, like stem cells, but when we take them to damaged stations like OO they repair it because theres no programing for them to follow and go back to default and start to repair mode, has anyone tired having UA's in with alloys in there cargo hold to see if the ship does still get damaged? could they could also be some sort of hidden virus, repairing the station to hide what it is doing in the back ground, sending out information about us? just my tinfoil theory
 
Was going to try and post something intelligible, but realised that whisky and cogent thoughts do not necessarily go together; as my 65% hull Python can attest after I bellyflopped while showing off...

Also, I must apologise to any other TS users this evening for the large volumes of nonscientific rubbish coming out of mouth! It's been a long week! :)
 

just been talking with fellow commanders about the meta-alloys, what if they are like stem cells, hear me out on this. The alloys are programmable, like stem cells, but when we take them to damaged stations like OO they repair it because theres no programing for them to follow and go back to default and start to repair mode, has anyone tired having UA's in with alloys in there cargo hold to see if the ship does still get damaged? could they could also be some sort of hidden virus, repairing the station to hide what it is doing in the back ground, sending out information about us? just my tinfoil theory
Meta alloy tinfoil: & they'll take over the whole structure. Any commander showing emotions is pulverized into fermenter.
 
I tried to get someone here interested in the musical part of the purrs. They are in perfect [pythogorean] 5ths [intervals] and run 3 scales, advancing 1 half-tone in further iterations [Eb, Emaj & Fmaj]. The base note of the scale is followed by a perfect 5th; sometimes each tone is repeated 2-3x, from base tone to 5th. This would give you your 1s and 0s in musical notation.

0 - base tone
1 - 5th (seven semitones between)

or

0-0-0-1-0-1-1

at no time are there any other intervals than the perfect 5th. Each set (scale) runs 7 times, then it goes up a half-step.

And yes, this was how the music sequence was done in Close Encounters, because the intervals are strictly mathematical and would be recognized by most thinking species, just as the periodic table of elements or algebraic equasions would have cross-species meanings. That's why we sent music along with the data on Voyager's Gold Record.

This is fascinating. I have some musical knowledge and it makes sense that the audio in all its form is crucial (presumption) in deciphering this UA and Barnicle location.

I haven't heard or been there yet but I have a question. You say it starts in the key of E-flat, then up a semi-tone key to major, then F major, F# etc etc, does it continue all the way up the scale in semi-tones until its inaudible and then reset or just the three key changes? [at what point does it reset to E flat again?]
 
Last edited:
I tried to get someone here interested in the musical part of the purrs. They are in perfect [pythogorean] 5ths [intervals] and run 3 scales, advancing 1 half-tone in further iterations [Eb, Emaj & Fmaj]. The base note of the scale is followed by a perfect 5th; sometimes each tone is repeated 2-3x, from base tone to 5th. This would give you your 1s and 0s in musical notation.

0 - base tone
1 - 5th (seven semitones between)

or

0-0-0-1-0-1-1

at no time are there any other intervals than the perfect 5th. Each set (scale) runs 7 times, then it goes up a half-step.

And yes, this was how the music sequence was done in Close Encounters, because the intervals are strictly mathematical and would be recognized by most thinking species, just as the periodic table of elements or algebraic equasions would have cross-species meanings. That's why we sent music along with the data on Voyager's Gold Record.

ive really wondered about the music side myself. close encounters popped into my head the first time i heard the "whale" sound. maybe its because im musically inclined but that noise sounded like music notes to me.. just very low octaves. maybe its just the sound engineers way of making the noise.. but i feel like they are very particular about their sounds in the game and attribute so many hidden things to them. more testing on the sounds needs to be done i believe. but we need a music professor and mathematician on it. lol.
 
Last edited:
Which Galnet post? The only one I've noticed mentioning the UAs and barnacles was a Canonn issued one.

A connection between the UAs and the barnacles seems very likely but I wouldn't call it confirmed.

I don't know man... Between the same sound they emit and the fact that meta alloy pods I've now observed multiple times emitting the same identical particles as the UA makes it very hard to ignore the connection, even for the sake of argument.
 
Was going to try and post something intelligible, but realised that whisky and cogent thoughts do not necessarily go together; as my 65% hull Python can attest after I bellyflopped while showing off...

Also, I must apologise to any other TS users this evening for the large volumes of nonscientific rubbish coming out of mouth! It's been a long week! :)

Last night I was paying too much attention to this thread and not enough attention to my asp as I was travelling from one barnacle to the next. Ran straight into a cliff and was left on 1%. Oops.
 
The Black Hole might be the key!

So, in a nebula with a black hole. Signal detected but distorted due to black hole.
.
How do the nebulas look like when looked at trough a black hole? Gravity lens effect? Distortions? Different when in SC or normal space?
.
Just a late night thought. Knock yourself out with this article.
"HubVis: Software for Gravitational Lens Estimation and Visualization from Hubble Data"
 
Last edited:
I don't know man... Between the same sound they emit and the fact that meta alloy pods I've now observed multiple times emitting the same identical particles as the UA makes it very hard to ignore the connection, even for the sake of argument.

The particles are similar but I'm not sure they're identical. They seem smaller to me. From a meta point of view I'm very aware that reusing existing assets is a very attractive idea so I'm wary of assigning meaning to something that might just be due to FD making decisions that reduce their development effort (for example there is still no better explanation for the UAs using Morse than the fact that the Morse stuff was already implemented for nav beacons). Visually the UAs and the barnacles are not that similar.

As I said, it seems likely there is a link. But we have no idea what that link is, and until we do it's unconfirmed as far as I'm concerned. Maybe I've just seen too many theories posted here about vague similarities between UAs and something else that didn't pan out (remember dung beetles? Whales? Mayan calendar systems?)

What I'd really like to see is a concerted effort to find barnacles in other nebulae. If barnacles seem to be only found in the Pleiades then that would strengthen the connection significantly.

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

So, in a nebula with a black hole. Signal detected but distorted due to black hole.
.
How do the nebulas look like when looked at trough a black hole? Gravity lens effect? Distortions? Different when in SC or normal space?
.
Just a late night thought. Knock yourself out with this article.
"HubVis: Software for Gravitational Lens Estimation and Visualization from Hubble Data"

My opinion is that the crashed ship Galnet story was setup by FD purely to lead us to barnacles because we'd taken so long to find any (and that it is purely coincidence that we happened to find one just before the story went live). The stuff about the black hole is therefore just an excuse for why the location was partly obfuscated; it's essentially just hand waving to explain why there is a puzzle at all. By the same reasoning I don't think there is any point to speculating about what the Anaconda was doing, whether or not it was carrying a UA, and so on; if the whole scenario was just a hint to lead us to the barnacles then it's unlikely to have any further part in the story. Obviously I could be wrong, but that's my reading of the situation.
 
Has anyone tried blinking out a message in morse code to our barnacle overlords with their SRV lights?

I think from a code point of view, it would be more trouble than it's worth to create a morse decoder - we'd need to know exact timing etc, it would be very hit and miss I think.
 
Was going to try and post something intelligible, but realised that whisky and cogent thoughts do not necessarily go together; as my 65% hull Python can attest after I bellyflopped while showing off...

Also, I must apologise to any other TS users this evening for the large volumes of nonscientific rubbish coming out of mouth! It's been a long week! :)

No worries, no science was lost.
I'll PM DerryBear that he need to restock dark chocolate & whiskey for the Obsidian Smudge Lavatory & Bar so we're prepared for later tonight.
We better try to reproduce the results.
 
It is quite strange that we have found barnacles on Pleione 11A because the planets description says that it contains little or no surface metal and that it has lost almost all of its volatiles. Thoughts anyone?
 
New 37 minute recording of the Barnacle.

Game Version: 2.0.0.3
Location: Pleiades Sector JC-U B3-2 2
Long: 49.9160
Lat: 102.7223
Barnacle State: Undamaged, Healthy
Time: Night-time
Vehicles on location: Anaconda, SRV
Debug Camera, Static, ~centre of barnacle.

Note: HD may still be processing.

[video=youtube;dFPb3LKfrWk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFPb3LKfrWk[/video]
 
Last edited:
Was going to try and post something intelligible, but realised that whisky and cogent thoughts do not necessarily go together; as my 65% hull Python can attest after I bellyflopped while showing off...

Also, I must apologise to any other TS users this evening for the large volumes of nonscientific rubbish coming out of mouth! It's been a long week! :)


I'm on my fifth beer and I can agree wholeheartedly... so.. what was I talking about? :) nuffin offishr, I was just shcmuggling slavesh *hic* and belly floppd next to the landin pad.. oopsie!
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom