black holes need to be more dangerus at the momont you can fly right in to the event horizon somthing need to happen even if it is just overheat form the fricion what do you guys think
Ship computer warnings. If you press on after "warning! dangerous gravity well detected!" you alone are to blame.
"Caution! Dangerous gravity well detected"
...
"Warning! Approaching event horizon!"
...
"Reaching point of no return in 5...4...3...2...1... See you on the other side, CMDR." *boom!*
Ship computer warnings. If you press on after "warning! dangerous gravity well detected!" you alone are to blame.
"Caution! Dangerous gravity well detected"
...
"Warning! Approaching event horizon!"
...
"Reaching point of no return in 5...4...3...2...1... See you on the other side, CMDR." *boom!*
This please!
A black hole gravitational pull is immense, that's the reason so many galaxies actually rotate around large ones, and many planetary bodies and even stars rotate around small black holes..
It should be menacing far beyond its event horizon, even the small ones.
We should not be able to simply jump into one like a teen jumps into a pool without consequence.
Exploration should be Dangerous.
In real life many explorers disappeared or at least were never heard of again.
No one even knew for sure if they died or just gave up and became native.
A Black Hole should be Extremely dangerous if you get anywhere near the Accretion Disk and even thinking of approaching the Event Horizon should be lethal.
The event horizon or Schwarzschild Radius is where the escape velocity equals the speed of light in a vacuum.
However escape velocity is for a ballistic trajectory - the speed needed for an unpowered projectile to escape the gravitational field and reach (eventually) infinity. A powered vehicle can still escape the surface so long as its gross acceleration exceeds the local gravity.
The gravitational strength (m.s-2) at the Schwarzschild Radius (r[SUB]s[/SUB]) is g[SUB]s[/SUB]=c2/2r[SUB]s[/SUB] - so the bigger the black hole, the lower the gravity at this radius.
So for Sag A* r[SUB]s[/SUB] = 40ls, g[SUB]s[/SUB] = c/80 = 3.75 Mm.s-2.
While a "minimal" 3M black hole r[SUB]s[/SUB] = 9 km, g[SUB]s[/SUB] = 5 x 1012 = 5 Tm.s-2.
You need a big engine - but bigger for smaller black holes.
However - this is all irrelevant as we have "Super Cruise" capable of superluminal velocities (arguably shifting you out of normal space into a local "bubble"). The speed of light is no longer a barrier, which throws open a lot of assumptions about risks and behaviour near a black hole.
Whats probably still relevant is the shear forces due to the gravitational gradient - your head and feet under different field strengths.
I suspect that this again doesn't affect you if you are comfortably inside your SC bubble - but we know that SC doesn't like strong local gravity, and the SC bubble collapses if this gets too high (fortunately this always happens before you enter a body - go figure).
TL;DR: We have SC - speed of light isn't a barrier - need to rewrite physics of Black Holes for this - anyone got Prof. Hawking's number?
Exploration should be Dangerous.
In real life many explorers disappeared or at least were never heard of again.
No one even knew for sure if they died or just gave up and became native.
A Black Hole should be Extremely dangerous if you get anywhere near the Accretion Disk and even thinking of approaching the Event Horizon should be lethal.
They actually need an accretion disk where appropriate. They don't even have that right now.