No thanks. I'll presume English isn't your first language and give you time to properly digest mine.
Digested and disposed of, post haste.
Last edited:
No thanks. I'll presume English isn't your first language and give you time to properly digest mine.
FD should not being doing anything to address players that don't buy Horizons. It's a waste of development time that will become a complete wreck if they have to balance for players with 10 variations of seasons purchased.
Force the annual upgrade. You have to ask yourself - how much development effort is put into maintaining the version-layered game? How much more could you get done without that limitation? How bad will it get if this thing really does go 10 seasons?
Force the upgrade already - consumers that are going to whine about how you're not paying attention to their old version x number of years down the road are not good for business, not good for future development, and an annoyance to those that are willing to pay for a completely fair business model (even noble amongst other present examples I'd contend).
No need to apologise, I wanted to get a strong reaction and you delivered
On the point of reasonable pricing: Maybe that's the money they need to ensure enough income for continuous deleopment. Also take a look at other games like CoD, AC or FIFA. If you want to play the newest version of those games you'll need to pay full price every year and you don't even get updates for your out-of-date version of the game. Lastly there will be a major sale every year, so if you think full price is too much you can get the expansion for 10 bucks.
FD need to keep the game balanced for all players, allowing some variations of the expansion to flow into the earlier versions, an example in an earlier post in this thread:
Players with Horizons can get engineer mods eventually, why cant non Horizon players salvage mods from wrecks and use those on their own ships.
You can not "force" people to buy anything, that sort of attitude from Frontier would drive players away.
Quit with the "force" this is not Star Wars![]()
So, say in five years time when you are still on the basic release, you want to be on the same level and access to a person who has bought all the continuing expansions. What you are suggesting is beyond parody, I think it's best if you spare yourself the grief and forget about the game if you believe that to be a viable prospect.
I did not say that I would expect to be "on the same level and access to a person who has bought all the continuing expansions" had I still got the basic release.
FD are basically doing this already with the Avatars on the Mission Lists, Outfitting, Bookmarks, etc, and i think I made a reasonable suggestion so [wacky] to you.![]()
So, say in five years time when you are still on the basic release, you want to be on the same level and access to a person who has bought all the continuing expansions. What you are suggesting is beyond parody, I think it's best if you spare yourself the grief and forget about the game if you believe that to be a viable prospect.
Don't know, maybe ask Apple or yourself. You are the one that bought a machine that offers 0 support for gaming by design.And how would you feel if to run the next upgrade meant you had to buy a whole new computer and operating system? Moving to Horizons may have cost you less than £50 but it will cost me the price of either a new PC capable of handling the game (£500-1000) or the cost of a windows operating system which must be around £100 and trying to figure out bootcamp.
And how would you feel if to run the next upgrade meant you had to buy a whole new computer and operating system? Moving to Horizons may have cost you less than £50 but it will cost me the price of either a new PC capable of handling the game (£500-1000) or the cost of a windows operating system which must be around £100 and trying to figure out bootcamp.
No it is International missing the point day.
The point was that for some of us the reason we haven't bought the upgrade isn't that we don't want to pay for it so feel that somebody else should do something to make it "fair" for us, but that for other historical reasons we can't even run the upgrade without extra investment beyond the cost of the upgrade.
The point wasn't how you would feel if you were in the situation my choices (as bad as they usually are) have put me in now, but how would you feel if the boot was on the other foot and you had to pay several times the price of the next upgrade to run it and the people who had more fortunate historical choices were telling you that the solution to your problems was just to buy the upgrade.
how would you feel if the boot was on the other foot and you had to pay several times the price of the next upgrade to run it.