UAs, Barnacles and other mysteries Thread 8 - The Canonn

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
I think the point is that a genuinely perfectly circular orbit does not have a meaningful defined position for periapsis. As I noted elsewhere however, it could just be very low eccentricity and rounded down in the GUI.

Presumably they just arbitrarily picked the point at which it was most distany from the plane of reference?
 
Just tried jettisoning various things (biowaste, hydrogen fuel, fertilizers etc) next to barnacle. nothing.

Can you imagine what the reaction would be if you jettisoned "slaves", nothing happened, tried "imperial slaves" and the barnacle gobbled them right up? :)
 
Presumably they just arbitrarily picked the point at which it was most distany from the plane of reference?

Circular orbits usually just "define" the periapsis to be at the ascending node, so the argument of periapsis == 0. But yeah, it's totally arbitrary really (which could I guess be a clue if the speculation about the angle in the diagram being M5c arg-peri is correct). Seems a bit of a reach TBH, but certainly possible.
 
You seen barnacles in these words or this is just your theory?
I have not checked them for Barnacles - I was only listing those worlds with surface conditions that are similar to those of known Barnacle sites.
My plan for my present trip is to investigate one or two worlds in detail (several hours of surface flying with possibly some SRV exploration each) but as I encounter more 'candidates' than I can survey, I report them here in case others are interested in searching but do not want to spend time finding candidates themselves.
 
Some bablings as I try to make sense of things.


Lets say you are called Paul you are out exploring the galaxy when you have problem and end up stuck in the Merope system. No way to get home what do you do.


First you set up a perimeter, trip wire system etc. This is the UAs they scan any ships that go by and report their type and position back to you, allowing you to decide wether friend or foe. This is defensive, you also need to be pro-ative in getting help so.


Second you send out the UPs in the direction of home (a bit like a message in bottle) carrying just enough information for you friends to find you.


Third you settle down for the long haul waiting to be rescued.


Over time what may have been a small shell of UAs has now expaned to be quite large. It would also explain why it may be hard find free floater UPs as they not in a shell but strung out in a long line thru the galaxy, but if found could give an indication of where Pauls home system is.


I suspect by now Paul may be dead.[noob]
 
Circular orbits usually just "define" the periapsis to be at the ascending node, so the argument of periapsis == 0. But yeah, it's totally arbitrary really (which could I guess be a clue if the speculation about the angle in the diagram being M5c arg-peri is correct). Seems a bit of a reach TBH, but certainly possible.


Something has to describe the curved angle bewteen the ascending node and position of highest inclination? The argument of latitiude, which is what you use when descrfibing a circular orbit, I think.
 
Last edited:
I just feel it worth pointing out how much this relates to Dr. Arcanonn:

"The others go with him as free companions, to help him on his way. You may tarry, or come back or turn aside in other paths, as chance allows. The further you go, the less easy it will be to withdraw; yet no oath or bond is laid on you to go further than you will. For you do not yet know the strength of your hearts, and you cannot forsee what each may meet upon the road."

Tolkien wrote some lovely prose
 
The simplest/most logical hypothesis I can make out of the diagram is that it is coordinates to a location on merope 5c. Use the angles to get the coordinates, but then we would need signifiers for "latitude" and "longitude" in order to use the coordinates. These signifiers seem simple:

1. The two half circles in the upper right quadrant may be away to indicated "latitude" to other species. When viewing a globe from above, this is how latitude lines appear (parallel with different circumferences as you move through the z-axis of the planetary body).

2. The upper left quadrant then signifies "longitude", using a single long arc that intersects with the planet's poles.

Then using the binary digits to read the diagram in order, one can start at l-- using the angle as a coord for -l- (longitude). Moving clockwise to step -ll (signifying latitude), we now get the lat. coord from the angles given in step --l.

Finally an alien would need something to indicate whether the coords are + or -. Overlaying the far right section of the spectrograph with the middle portion creates an image in which the two half circles in the upper right quadrant overlap perfectly (indicating positive coords), while a new "longitude" arch over laps with the lower left quadrant ( indicating negative coords).

Im testing different coords on merope 5c now and throughout this week to see if this holds true. After all the probe points toward merope 5c :).
 
Just something that came to mind reading along in this thread.

There's a dialog going on about 5c not having a complete circular orbit.
There was also someone (sorry can't find the post so soon on my tablet) who points out that the circle or sphere in the image is slightly out of alignment, he showed it clearly by with different overlays.

Could the image from the UP be a projection of 5c's orbit?
 
Something has to describe the curved angle bewteen the ascending node and position of highest inclination?

The inclination is the same all along the orbit but I know what you mean - the highest point above the 0-inclination plane. It's not one of the 6 defining elements (semimajor, eccentricity, inclination, longitude of ascending node, argument of periapsis, mean anomaly). I guess it's the solstice - can't honestly say I've come across a specific term, it's not really a relevant parameter, but my astrophysics is about 15 years old at this point, and I'm mainly going off KSP and Scott Manley if I'm honest...
 
Last edited:
The inclination is the same all along the orbit but I know what you mean - the highest point above the 0-inclination plane. It's not one of the 6 defining elements (semimajor, eccentricity, inclination, longitude of ascending node, argument of periapsis, mean anomaly). I guess it's the solstice - can't honestly say I've come across a specific term, it's not really a relevant parameter, but my astrophysics is about 15 years old at this point, and I'm mainly going of KSP and Scott Manley if I'm honest...

Sorry, I literally fell asleep mid reply - I have already edited it

When the orbit is circular you use that measurement; the argument of latitide ( I could not think of its name) in place of the argument of peri to describe the highest point of inclination/latitude.
 
Last edited:
For what it's worth I would just like to point out that in all my exploring and I've done quite a bit of it:

Systems visited 11,914
level 3 scans 93,611

In the last eight months I've yet to find another 14% metal content rocky body orbiting a secondary gas giant or dwarf. They are usually somewhere between 3.0 to 9.8% and the 14% are only found around other rocky or metallic planets. So Merope 5c is extremely unique. I would say that 5c was possibly captured at some time.

I believe in what you say: Merope 5c is super special.

P.S. Rizal72, you have brass ones to try to run and maintain this thread. Or more patience and understanding than I can muster!

Not brass, unfortunately. More like... Meta Alloys...

The simplest/most logical hypothesis I can make out of the diagram is that it is coordinates to a location on merope 5c. Use the angles to get the coordinates, but then we would need signifiers for "latitude" and "longitude" in order to use the coordinates. These signifiers seem simple:

1. The two half circles in the upper right quadrant may be away to indicated "latitude" to other species. When viewing a globe from above, this is how latitude lines appear (parallel with different circumferences as you move through the z-axis of the planetary body).

2. The upper left quadrant then signifies "longitude", using a single long arc that intersects with the planet's poles.

Then using the binary digits to read the diagram in order, one can start at l-- using the angle as a coord for -l- (longitude). Moving clockwise to step -ll (signifying latitude), we now get the lat. coord from the angles given in step --l.

Finally an alien would need something to indicate whether the coords are + or -. Overlaying the far right section of the spectrograph with the middle portion creates an image in which the two half circles in the upper right quadrant overlap perfectly (indicating positive coords), while a new "longitude" arch over laps with the lower left quadrant ( indicating negative coords).

Im testing different coords on merope 5c now and throughout this week to see if this holds true. After all the probe points toward merope 5c :).

I like your point, at least the preamble:
so the upper part is to define what informations are given in the lower part, nice.

But then, why the longitude needs two outer lines, so many angles, and the latitude only one line, then two angles. And why they are differently drawn?
With outer lines the first, and inner line the second?
 
Last edited:
If only we had a clearer display of the glyphs to the left of the main circle, and to the right. Maybe it's all noise but I can't help but feel there is more to discover there that may help our understanding of the central bit.

Someone asked about 3d spectral somethings. Software is available online and you can get fully functional ones, albeit with a timed trail. 21 days should be enough for someone. Not me, I don't have a scoobie.

PS hunting for probes is probably the most madding thing I've yet to undertake in ED.
 
Last edited:
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom