UAs, Barnacles and other mysteries Thread 8 - The Canonn

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
OK CMDRS IT'S TIME TO GO!

I'LL BE OFF FOR A COUPLE OF WEEKS.
I'll be following the thread on my phone when I can.
Please PM me only for relevant DISCOVERIES that need to go to the Frontpage.
Do not PM me your theories.

CHEERS!


Do not PM me your theories. sorry thats me wont happen again.

have a great holiday and remember to wear lots of tinfoil so you don't over heat and or freeze.
 
Darned upsetting when you have a detailed hypothesis to follow. Ruined my research today. Bah!

Oh righty.

"- Fix crash when calculating the tidal locking amount for a planet with exactly -180 axial tilt" From the changelog.

That explains it then... Hopefully.
 
new systems must be fed navy outposts
unknown.png

unknown.png

thing is they are independent??
 
Last edited:
With the recent tip from MB about the AU/UP being space based and the transmission from ship about transporting NHE for orbital testing, I'm going out on a limb and saying the top left side of the UP image is meant to be a symbol of doing that part from orbit. Perhaps this gives better insight to the other pieces. I think the last part with the same MB tip, that the last part is landing, which jives with the symbol in lower left.

It may be that, or it may be an indication of a ring, or asteroid belt. I don't know if people have tried pinging the UP within the ring of M5 or the belt of Merope.
 
So the planet I've been on for two days (Witch Head Sector LC-V c2-10 A 4), with an intact Barnacle... Now has a damaged Barnacle instead :(


On a side note, given the new material information per planet, I wonder if there's now hints to if a planet is suitable. For example, at least one of these three has a barnacle.
Xfpicc0.jpg
YyXvuG2.jpg
144EmHV.jpg

The first two are orbiting twins... The third is a neighbour with a known barnacle.
 
Last edited:
.eJwVx8ENwyAMAMBdGADXLiAn2yCCSNQEI-yoj6q7V73ffdw9T7e63WzoCrAdWmRuXk1mbtU3kXbWPA71RS7IZrnsV-2mgLxEpAdTYKKUEAn-4ycjJYoRQ1gY7v7q8u5-9Oa-PwYOItY.BJK9zLlB5FnuaqCAhJjUB_0mRqA.png

controlling faction shows alliance is Federation but faction info below show it as independent and so does galmap
looks like I've got a bug report to fill!
 
The 2.1 patch introduced space areas (e.g. ship lines, orbital space around bodies etc), so yeah, even pointing to 5c, it could be just related to the 3-4Ls close to the planet (when the left/down indicator says you are close to that body). We can't tell yet if the mystery involves planet landing.

That is a very good point. Perhaps we should reconsider - before the UP sonogram was revealed & diverted thoughts to a potential surface solution there were reports of blue flashes above a location on 5C (which coincided with the Antares Memorial Galnet article & its mention of metamaterials bending light in unusual fashion, hinting at a cloaking mechanism) & other things were happening in 5C orbit. So can the sonogram be reassessed from the viewpoint of an orbital solution?
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom