I'm just saying people shouldn't feel they've been offered their hat because their computer isn't good enough, they're in a rural area or something. I genuinely believe we're just missing things for being too obvious.
...I'm going to give up on English and make a language all of my own
I'm perplexed this statement. I can do this work on a 10 year old mac mini I just have laying around. Audio spectra don't require a beefy computer. I know that not everyone in the world has a computer but it seems weird that they'd be able to play Elite and not also have a computer. What does a "rural area" have to do with anything? Anyway, perhaps I've taken your comment out of context and if I have, I pre-apologize. I just didn't get it.
or get a shieldtank chip the sield of the python down hachbreaker, collector the probe and fsd out
maybe we coud get an aswer out of the feds why they are trying to take controll of merope if we ua bomb sol
Is your keyboard broken? Not trying to make fun, especially because I know we have an international group here, but maybe slow down and try to get all the letters in?
This raises the question, "Has anyone tried feeding them?" Which leads to... "Has anyone tried feeding these?
Also maybe try feeding them in close proximity to one another?
I don't know exactly what you mean by "feed" but the Unknown Artifact has been placed next to *literally* every commodity in the game, pre 2.0 I believe. Fish were one of the first things tried.
Anybody got an idea what USS we are looking for for free-floaters? (description/threat level)
Convoy Dispersal Pattern (Threat 4)
Well, we can't know that yet. All we know is that they ARE pointing at 5c and on 5c is a gigantic crater. Not unique in all of space but unique on 5c. It is therefor fair to assume that it is an important location of note until we figure out otherwise.
Science is running with your best idea until it is proven wrong by the forces of the universe. If we find proof that the crater is pointless then we will abandon it. ''What If...''s are not going to sway people alone.
Problem is you can have ideas that can't or won't be proven wrong.
So I extrapolated every symbol in that spectrogram from the station sound:
https://s31.postimg.org/i31675ie3/code.png
This is only one of each symbol. Some of them are repeated occasionally, suggesting a code of sorts.
It really frustrating how much it looks like letters but also doesn't.
Whatever your theory might be - the idea is that the circle and symbols mean something.
Lets just review the numbers generated by the circle
The circle has a radius of 1 second (This doesn't seem to be a coincidence)
the circle has a circumference of 6.24 seconds
The circle is divided into quadrants.
a radius line is in the bottom right quadrant dividing that quadrant in 2
A line is drawn parallell to the circumference in the top left quadrant
two lines intesect the circumference from outside the circle. this marks an area of 1/12 the circumference. (0.52 seconds)
If you take the 0 as the top these lines represent, 4/12 to 5/12 pf the total circumference. If you take )
If you take 0 as the conventional right side they mark 7/12 to 8/12
If you take 0 as the radius line they represent 17/24 to 19/24 as fraction of the circumference
In terms of trigonometry
the radius line has x axis point of + 0.707
the radius line has a y axis point of - 0.707
the two line intersecting circumference in bottom left quadrant have tangent of -0.64 and -2.24 respectively
they have an x axis point of -0.54 and -0.91 respectively
they have a y axis point of -0.84 and - 0.41 respectively
Whatever theory turns out true at least some fact of these numbers would be relevant. THe fact that the representation seems to be a unit circle suggests this is a puzzle to solve before applying to any geographical features.
Your first statement is false. Had to check this myself on a couple audio files just to make sure. Even if you use the outermost "glow" from the circle as it's edge it's at most 1.8 seconds in diameter/duration.
(on preview I see someone beat me to it)
------
Now, while I'm seeing people make accusations, reprobations, and sweeping generalizations, let me make a few statements of my own. I've been following this thread since late in thread 1. It's one of my favorite parts of the game. I've met and talked to a lot of cool and friendly people who consider themselves Canonn and this community has always been a welcome and polite one for me. Now, I see a lot of people getting frustrated about a lot of different things. There are "old-timers" who are getting annoyed at people who are just finding out about this stuff asking the same four or five questions over and over again and let it show. I see people here and on discord wanting somehow to
force the story to move forward by whipping everyone into a frenzy about some half-remembered rumor or anecdote that
has to be the big break we've been waiting for (I've fallen into this trap myself recently as well), or even just making stuff up for excitement or attention. Finally, there are many people here who think that having some inconsistency in their proposed theory or test pointed out, or even that it was done before, is somehow counter to investigation and testing and not supportive.
About the first two things I don't know that there's much to do other than try to be calm, even-handed, and understanding. In regard to the last point, I think I have rarely, if ever, seen someone on these threads tell someone else that they shouldn't do a test. I don't think I've ever seen someone's theory outright made fun of (other than the fish). We all have fun and crazy sci-fi ideas about what's going on in the game, and criticism and debate are part of hashing those things out with each other. Being a supportive community doesn't mean agreeing with every theory, and having your idea criticized is not the same as being dismissed. Take the criticism, respond to it, or use it to modify your ideas.
Man, that got longer than I meant. I hope any of that was coherent.
