UAs, Barnacles and other mysteries Thread 8 - The Canonn

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Remind the facts

The way the thinking goes on in this discussion, is in the way i like it. But in my mind we are losing the focus of the facts that we have. So here are some points that are really interesting for me:

1.) Why were always only the Frequenzrange of the hearable Soundrange checked?

2.) Everyone sees the 4 Markers @ the circle but why are they at these points at the grafic? 1.one bottom right than 2.one top left than 3.one top right and the 4.one bottom left???

3.) Does anyone of you know a kind of writting where you write in an X-style? I mean in english we start at the top left write to the right and than the next line but here it looks different. For me the universal language is mathe and science. If you have found why we have to read in the X-style please tell me how you found it and the way you read the instruction.

4.) What the Spektrumgrafic shows us depends strongly by the frequenz filters used but if you compare the Spectrumgrafic with waveform signal of the audio you can see some points where are Datas in it. Befor and after the circle. What i mean with this is: that at the point where the audio signal is strong we don´t see data, but where the signal is weak we can see the circle

5.) Think of with the Arecibo-Message send to Space by Mankind. Remember the prime numbers. Here we have 23 and 41 bothe are prime numbers. So we could read the databits.

6.) I would check the long audiofile for some data points or something like that, but i just can listen to it atm. So if anyone of you have the audiofile please let me know how i can get it for some testing.

7.) Did anyone tryed out to remove the noise shadow in front of the main grafic in spektrum. you can see it in the gif, if you look only at the thing that don´t change.

8.) For me is the Grafic not only 1 key, the complete grafic is at min. 2 Keys for me or maybe more.

I hope that this post is not over read by you guys because a mod need to confirm my post.
 

Ozric

Volunteer Moderator
I just wanted to say while it's a bit quieter here that maybe some of you have been thinking about visiting Jaques Station, but thinking maybe you wouldn't have the motivation to get there.

Well it's the Buckyball Racing Club's first birthday and we've organised a couple of humdingers. The first one, which although not overly relevant here, is 60 systems forming the outline of a Buckyball. But the second... as you may have guessed is nothing less than a race out to Jaques but, just for good measure, including CG cargo :D
 
was on Merope 5c last night, when reviewing video that was taken I got this :-http://imgur.com/rrsAWs7 http://imgur.com/rrsAWs7

It was just seconds after I had used ad scanner:)

Hey Cmdr, I've seen this many times too, it was also discussed in a thread (sorry can't find it) not long after Horizons was launched.

It makes sence to me that it's a bug, basically it's like you see yourself exit glide/supercruise in front of yourself, and is usually accompanied by the sonic boom/thump sound of entering or exiting SC.

I always see it just before exiting a particularly long shallow glide.


About Maia: I spent 3 hours in cruising around at 100C there yesterday, also checked out the Black Hole.
Found nothing unusual, just a few Degraded emissions threat 0, and a couple of weapons fire detected threat 2. I travelled over 700,000 ls from the star......nada.
 
Last edited:
there is more in the picture then we have reveal already did try somebody to look at the spectrum picture with google cardboard or a vr set

mW7cEDT.jpg
 
Last edited:
Just one thing: Can we rule out that we are able to find freefloaters in an asteroid belt? (game limitations -> degrading cargo in free space etcpp)?
 
Last edited:
there is more in the picture then we have reveal already did try somebody to look at the spectrum picture with google cardboard or a vr set

Yeah this has been tried already too.

As for my personal goal, once I secure some racks from Palin I might make the trip out to Jacques. As Ozric mentioned earlier though, I find the distance to be a bit daunting and potentially boring lol

Especially if I am nearly there and then the mystery is solved without me, either at Jacques or back at home lol
 

Ozric

Volunteer Moderator
Yeah this has been tried already too.

As for my personal goal, once I secure some racks from Palin I might make the trip out to Jacques. As Ozric mentioned earlier though, I find the distance to be a bit daunting and potentially boring lol

Especially if I am nearly there and then the mystery is solved without me, either at Jacques or back at home lol

If you race like a true Buckyballer, then the races are never boring because you get to watch your module integrity slowly decreasing due to heat damage! https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showt...lenge)/page5?p=4290474&viewfull=1#post4290474
 
[COLOR=rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.701961)]I find it interesting if i transcribe the pulses in the UP audio to binary I get what looks like random numbers, then swap them to alpha numeric and random letters, so put them in a cryptogram solver and one of the top results was barnard[COLOR=rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.2)](edited)[/COLOR]



[/COLOR]

[COLOR=rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.701961)]the tinfoil in me wants to say i have something here, none of the pulses go over binary 26 and when converted from numeric to alpha it gives a code that can clearly translate to BARNARD[COLOR=rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.2)](edited)
[/COLOR]



[/COLOR]

[COLOR=rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.701961)]in 6 min 20 sec i get 7 sets of pulses between the loud singing of the UP. Translated as high pitch=1 low pitch=0[COLOR=rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.2)](edited)

http://imgur.com/a/IwXxB
[/COLOR]



[/COLOR]

[COLOR=rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.701961)]set 110110=22 vset 210011=19 sset 30110=6 fset 41001=9 iset 510011=19 sset 60110=6 fset 71010=10 j[COLOR=rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.2)](edited)
[/COLOR]



[/COLOR]

[COLOR=rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.701961)]there are 2 repeated strings in there 19 - 6, 19 - 6 so this is smelling fishy , So i take the numbers and turn them into letters since by coincidence they are all under 26 (letters in english alphabet) and binary counts to 256[COLOR=rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.2)](edited)
[/COLOR]



[/COLOR]

[COLOR=rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.701961)]that gives me VSFISFJ




[/COLOR]

[COLOR=rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.701961)]v=B s=A f=R i=N s=A f=R j=D




[/COLOR]

[COLOR=rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.701961)]this is coming together way too easy to be a screwup I need someone else to look at this[COLOR=rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.2)](edited)
[/COLOR]


[/COLOR]

Took the liberty of reformatting.

I find it interesting if i transcribe the pulses in the UP audio to binary I get what looks like random numbers, then swap them to alpha numeric and random letters, so put them in a cryptogram solver and one of the top results was barnard[/COLOR]


the tinfoil in me wants to say i have something here, none of the pulses go over binary 26 and when converted from numeric to alpha it gives a code that can clearly translate to BARNARD


in 6 min 20 sec i get 7 sets of pulses between the loud singing of the UP. Translated as high pitch=1 low pitch=0


http://imgur.com/a/IwXxB


set 110110=22 vset 210011=19 sset 30110=6 fset 41001=9 iset 510011=19 sset 60110=6 fset 71010=10


there are 2 repeated strings in there 19 - 6, 19 - 6 so this is smelling fishy , So i take the numbers and turn them into letters since by coincidence they are all under 26 (letters in english alphabet) and binary counts to 256


that gives me VSFISFJ


v=B s=A f=R i=N s=A f=R j=D


this is coming together way too easy to be a screwup I need someone else to look at this
 
Last edited:
Ahhh good to know .... Hmmmm so it can't be a direct response to the discovery scanner... Gerrr :). Well still holding out for a good UA scan recording
just as a note on scientific methodology....

We start thinking the probe responds to the Advanced DS honk
We discover new evidence it will respond to any DS honk

How do you get from "will respond to any honk" to "it's not the honk"? We need to be careful with our theorising and not make too many leaps - there are a few people way out in the theory wilderness at the moment
 
Something the glyphs around the circle could represent, assuming that they're in binary:

| - - = Hydrogen (1 proton)
- | - = Helium (2 protons)
- - | = Beryllium (4 protons)
- | | = Carbon (6 protons)

So it's the sequence of elements formed in a star.

Can anyone take this further? Maybe it's something like the type of stars barnacles prefer? Or it's just to show that they're aware of this (Voyager record-thing).
 
just as a note on scientific methodology....

We start thinking the probe responds to the Advanced DS honk
We discover new evidence it will respond to any DS honk

How do you get from "will respond to any honk" to "it's not the honk"? We need to be careful with our theorising and not make too many leaps - there are a few people way out in the theory wilderness at the moment

Not 100% sure but I think this all has been done. Including KWS and Cargoscan.
 
Something the glyphs around the circle could represent, assuming that they're in binary:

| - - = Hydrogen (1 proton)
- | - = Helium (2 protons)
- - | = Beryllium (4 protons)
- | | = Carbon (6 protons)

So it's the sequence of elements formed in a star.
maybe its the elements that form thier kind of life on thier planet. or thier own body.
for us its oxygen, carbon, nitrogen, hydrogen, Phosphorus etc
 
How do you get from "will respond to any honk" to "it's not the honk"? We need to be careful with our theorising and not make too many leaps - there are a few people way out in the theory wilderness at the moment

When evidence suggests that we need to worry about it being something non-specific to Discovery Scanners.

ADS and Standard Scanners are not so different that this is unusual. The only difference between the two is range, and given you have to be in an instance with the probe it makes sense that both work.

However, expanding that out into OTHER items is not something our theories have to worry about UNTIL there is evidence to suggest that we need to incorporate such data.

By all means do tests to find out if such data exists but we CAN safely theorise all we like based on current evidence.
 
Took the liberty of reformatting.


Thx.
I still dont get the VSFISFJ = BARNARD thing.
What cypher should that be? Or is it just a guess?

because V and S are not next to each other like B and A are.
And if the alphabet is completely mixed up we don't have enough information to say it's supposed to mean BARNARD.
 
How do you get sound above 23k HZ? It's not possible, unless you've modified the files I think. Effects?
It must be artefacts in the way you use Sonic Visualizer. I've used it, but never seen artefacts like that.

It depends on the max frequenz you set for makeing the spectogram grafic. I used Audacity and Sonic Visualiser and in both of them i can take a look at the frequenzes above 20kHz. The reason why i do that is. We should take a look at all what is send to us and not only at the things we can hear from the UP.
I
 
May I? Since Michael Brooks said Jacques´ shouldn´t have been found by sheer luck, the UP could be a hint to find him. Or were there any other hints ingame to find Jacque?

I am digging for hints.

One thing that keeps coming to mind for me is that I have no personally played a game where the developers are actually taking part in ages. This happens with MUDs or some kind of DnD game, but most MMOs tend to end down the Korean path. That is, the Developers just sits back and make sure the cash keeps coming. Add all references to Skinner Boxes into this and you've got 99% of online gaming content.

Elite's different. This is very much more in line with 2004 and younger games: Where Devs actually had a care for their game and community.

I think it could have gone either way.


Tending to lean toward FD being the Dungeon Master you always want to have. This being true, then ya... there are hints and we missed them. Or we have them and we aren't getting that we do. Probably lots of both.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom