if SC is better than ED i think even the hardcore FD lovers will simply lie about playing it.
of course we will get the inevitable proof posts of playtimes posted and the bickering,but people will always go for the better rather than play sub standard to prove a point and then lie about it
i wonder who knows who ronnie pickering is ..... lol
I've been following both since the very beginning. I kick myself for not being an ED alpha backer as I actually didn't hear about it until it was too late - I remember in the late 90's and early 2000's during the "old" internet and really "pre-google" finding those 2-3 message boards that had a source from a source about FD and Braben working on Elite 4 - maybe. It didn't change for years. Then one day AFTER hearing about SC I learned about ED.
Now - if SC ends up being "better" (subjective, there are no plans for galaxy scale, ~150 systems, which is big enough as it's the same Size give or take, of the X2/X3 Egosoft series). I'll congratulate both.
The thing is ED is here and now and it gets better and better. I was cold to the Horizons Update but ironically the Engineer update made me really appreciate the Horizons update - I like landing planetside now - all on its own. the Engy update exposed me to that "exploration" hook.
They will be different games - One of ED's qualities is that it's here and now.
I have no idea what my playtime is, but it's in the 1000's of hours at this point.