Playing with Zoltan's ball (UP image, but rotated) Its interesting the type of data you get spinning the radial line around. These theories have been proposed before, just trying to throw some evidence to support/refute. All numbers based on clockwise motion of radial line.
The pair of outside lines become a pair of numbers, like a coordinate (~97, ~68). The long arc is a range (130-220), and the last quadrant is whack, because you can't associate the radial line with it, you can guess at it (246-259-261). The outside lines will fit it, rather well (178).
If somebody laid out those numbers, in degrees, it looks like a go here, move this far, look this way type deal.
Why this theory doesn't work? The binary numbers, the 1 2 3 4 count. The first is radial line. Ok, got that, the second is the range, the third is the point, and the fourth is the weird signal receive one. To do a move stop face things should be in a different order.
My question for all you smart lads and gals out there. What process of travel/map/calculation starts with an angle (the radial line) or a range (the arc)? The two lines, which may be coords, is step three. So i'd like to stay away from that. IF there's not a process that starts with information the radial line or range arc, we might be able to rule out what this key is used for.
Following the binary number order, the sequence is 0(bearing?), 130-220 (Range?), (97,68)(Position?), (246-259-261)(Wave scanner bearing? Incoming signal?). That's spinning the radial line, might need to change the numbers by 135 (or whatever the radial line angle is) to get 'correct' values. Just trying to see if sensible data -structure- is there before getting picky with numbers.
