Legacy_LuckyLuke
Banned
Question (probably to LuckyLuke and most of the regulars): is it worth approaching our research in a similar way the Canonn have been doing with the UP? Can I suggest we use a section on the first page of this thread to post hypotheses in the following form:
Hypothesis: [hypothesis description]
Testing activities: [steps to be taken to confirm or disprove the hypothesis]
Results: [description of results that lead to the conclusion below]
Hypothesis status: confirmed / rejected / open
Hypothesis: Rho Cassiopeiae holds IT
Testing activities: Go to Rho Cassiopeiae
Results: CMDR turkwinif went to Rho Cassiopeiae. Remarkable system and hard to get to, but no obvious IT
Hypothesis status: rejected
Hypothesis: Whatever Rebecca found on the NEAR side of the Rift was forced to retreat to the FAR side of the Rift
Testing activities: [to be suggested]
Results: tbd
Hypothesis status: open
Hey I just saw this. Great idea ... And you'll see I already reserved the fifth OP exactly for this purpose when I set up the thread
I'll add those two above. Thanks for the prompt
- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -
I doubt it would be easy to track the Formidine Rift mystery the same way as the Canonn do their experiments with the UP. The Canonn are familiar with their subjects: the Barnacles, the Probes, the Artifacts. They have subjects that they can perform experiments on.
True ... But there are a few obvious things that we could list out in this way that might be a little easier to keep track of. It was my intention way back when but I never got around to it
Last edited: