I'm still in favour. Drugs can help him.
Added him to ignore, he is almost certainly trolling and if not there is nothing to gain from continuing to discuss with him. Yet another user who doesn't accept reality nor wishes to discuss facts.
The Star Citizen Thread v5
- Thread starter Brett C
- Start date
- Status
I'm still in favour. Drugs can help him.
Added him to ignore, he is almost certainly trolling and if not there is nothing to gain from continuing to discuss with him. Yet another user who doesn't accept reality nor wishes to discuss facts.
Heads up it's happy time!
How much leeway do you think he's due?
no offense mate, but any where between 2030 and the eventual heat death of the universe should suffice
Last edited:
No offence mate - but unless you own an Idris you simply won't understand a project of this scope and fidelity.
And can you show me where any of you know who's games have modelled the heat death of the universe?!
With the current rate of progression, with regression many times over the past 3 years, it is a safe bet there will be people still buying ship jpegs off of an AI built specifically to mimic CR and design outrageous ship designs and those people will be the kids of current whales. Mind you, no game will exist, it will keep promising more with specially timed "demos" that are still scripted events that aren't playable and have no representation of what may possibly get released.
So this is where CIG are directing all their procedural tech resources towards........... some sort of unrelenting word salad generator.
Add him to ignore? - No chance. I'm out exploring while I post and I need the odd break - there's so many awesome sights out here but I gotta make a cup of tea and relax now and again - these posts are fun.
I'd reply point by point to the last post, but I'm getting close to some neutron stars and I don't want to get tied up in something that doesn't matter
.Add him to ignore? - No chance. I'm out exploring while I post and I need the odd break - there's so many awesome sights out here but I gotta make a cup of tea and relax now and again - these posts are fun.
I'd reply point by point to the last post, but I'm getting close to some neutron stars and I don't want to get tied up in something that doesn't matter
I don't blame you.
But - but someone has to take one for the team and do a point by point.
It's not gonna be me that's ferrr damn sure!
But I will doff my cap to anyone prepared to roll their sleeves up and get stuck in.
I'm tempted... But I'm guessing someone is working on it right now
And if I lose a few mil of exploration data (including 3 new ELP's) looking up a point and swandive into a star - I'll be a trifle peeved.
As someone for whom the drugs have and haven't worked in equal proportions (just ask my psychiatrist and/or anyone who knows me), I resemble that remark! [wacky]
Last edited:
Simulating the end of time? Im gald you asked. This is a feature we have definitely considered and once a switch is flicked this aspect will be refractored into the erm pipeline, unlike, you know, other space sims, the heat death model will be hand crafted at you you know, the Plank length.....<theory crafts for another 9400 words>
Ah, ok. Yeah, that makes sense.
Still, the EVE world simulation is actually a fair bit more detailed than it gets credit for. Sure, it only update at 1Hz ticks, but it actually resolves actions at a millisecond basis, and the way you fly your ship — even moment to moment — will change how hit chances are calculated. So it's entirely possible to create lots of misses and poor hits by shrewd flying.
Listen. Understand. That unrelenting word salad generator is out there. It can't be reasoned with, it can't be bargained with. It doesn't feel pity or remorse or fear - and it absolutely will not stop - ever - until you buy an Idris.
You're just flat out wrong on this one — especially the hilarious “no offence” part — which has been proven over and over and over and over, and no amount of refusal to accept the facts handed to you will change that. You never even understood the argument, so the fact that you have no idea how wrong you are or how utterly irrelevant your nonsensical counter-argument is just comes as a natural consequence of that.
This is what happens when you don't read. I never called something a roadmap. You did. You were wrong about that. The thing you called a roadmap isn't a roadmap. Nor is it a plan. Nor is it a delivery schedule. Read what people write. No, really. Read it. Because it is your adamant refusal to do so that makes you consistently wrong about everything you've ever said.
Good thing I didn't say it was one, then.
…aside from the goalposts. Whenever you're wrong (and you're always wrong), you try to change some minor detail about the things you refused to research in the hopes that, this time, you won't be wrong. But since you haven't done the research, you don't understand what it is you're changing, so you just end up being wrong again. Like how you have moved the goalpost from my presenting a list of features with an estimated time of arrival to giving you a roadmap. I never said anything of the kind — you did. You moved the goalposts. You created a strawman. You keep being wrong and you keep trying to rescue yourself from that failure by altering what others have said. This makes you even more wrong than you were before.
Yes it is, because it would mean that the whole thing was a scam from the get-go. That's always all kinds of strange.
Last edited:
Come with me if you want LTI!!
That's just made me think.
Chris Roberts is the Deepak Chopra of the gaming world...
- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -
Just a quick one, dude.
If by 31 December 2016 these features do not exist in a user playable form, will you come here and apologise for everything that you said?
You want to swear by that?
On my part 3.0 going by the demo isn't exciting (tbh I thought that the demo was horrible), but if they deliver a rich mission system by 31 December 2016 I'll give them their fair dues and admit my error on that part.
EDIT 2: FWIW the "Feature list" on the CIG site simply describes what is there, in kinda florid terms. 1 system, no planetary landings, the mission structure is a stretch, etc.
Last edited:
Sorry, but there's nothing impenetrable about the game. It's very simple and straightforward. Plus the manual, help, commands are all built-in and barely a keystroke away. It ain't broke; so I have no intentions of "fixing" it. Anyone who wants to play the game, has to read the manual right off the bat.
The game doesn't do instancing; also every question you have about the game is in the FAQ http://lodgame.com/faq/
Last edited:
Okay, I'm biased as hell, fine.
So you're:
a) Willing to wait until 2018 to get something that is just MVP,
b) not what you paid for and that cost 120 million dollars (and the rest),
c) is overdue by four years,
d) that contains "an Similar Amount and Depth of Features as Elite Dangerous holds on this Point" (don't you think you're being a bit short changed? seeing as ED has been produced on what? 1/10 the money?),
e) admitting that "it would have been much better management to go about it like ED",
And you still think they deserve to be treated the same? After just admitting ED is a better managed project that will have a similar amount of depth and features for a fraction of the cost that you haven't had to wait god knows how long for?
Can you not see how that might make you look just a teeny weeny bit biased yourself?
"Come with me if you want give..............er more money to RSI/CIG/CryNet/mySlushfund"
On a more on topic note, any predictions for the upcoming CitzenCon
rubbish
Last edited:
- Status