Don't worry about it, mostly a bit of fun.
As for yours, my super power enabled me to see it right away. Finally a good use for near-sightedness, just moved a foot back and the answer blurred into sharp relief.
Something a bit more serious, was going to pm about this once I figured it at least half out,,,,
Quite annoyed about different sources giving varying galactic coordinates. I'd go with 1. Simbad and 2. Stellarium. They really shouldn't be that different. I've noted in reading the generally accepted margin of error is .05 to as high as .1 degree which is a lot.
I wonder if this logic works?
using :
http://www.random-science-tools.com/maths/coordinate-converter.htm
for a given galactic coordinate at a give distance
distance, lat, long yielding the x,y,z
if for the given distance plugging in the error margin will give you the plus/minus x,y,z ?
ie 9000, .1, .1 yields 15.71, 0.02742, 9000
and just tried that and it doesn't work, unless the first number is the amount? 16 lyrs look too small
no short cut, have to add subtract it to the spherical coordinates to start with as a range