Is there a combination of SCB's and shield cell banks I can use which WONT make my ship overheat, and still deliver a meaningful charge to my 1800+ shields? Or am I chasing the impossible dream?
I went with G5 resistance on a 7A shield generator, and G3 heavy duty on the boosters. I have the exact same utility setup as you. 6 heatsinks matches the 6 charges on my SCB's. Right now I have 2x 6a SCB's, I use the heatsink when I fire those off, but I still warm up to about 145% sometimes, and usually when I dock up after a round of CZ fighting I have 5-10% module damage every time. I'm starting to think that's just par for the course.That's a lot of shields for a Conda. Are they resistant or did you just go as boosted as you can? Anyway, heat sinks, heat sinks, heat sinks.
My Conda has a modest 1355 mj shields (but quite resistant). I have 6a shields with a 7a and a 6a SCBs. I release one SCB immediately followed by a heat sink and when the temp goes between 15 and 20 % I spit out the other SCB. Seems to work pretty well. That's two high level SCBs per one sink. I have two sinks, one chaff and five boosters.
Yeah, it really is a matter of timing the release. Sometimes I get it right and sometimes I'll cook slightly. There are those have it down to a science. I just sorta wing it.I went with G5 resistance on a 7A shield generator, and G3 heavy duty on the boosters. I have the exact same utility setup as you. 6 heatsinks matches the 6 charges on my SCB's. Right now I have 2x 6a SCB's, I use the heatsink when I fire those off, but I still warm up to about 145% sometimes, and usually when I dock up after a round of CZ fighting I have 5-10% module damage every time. I'm starting to think that's just par for the course.
I'll have to try your sequencing.
I went with G5 resistance on a 7A shield generator, and G3 heavy duty on the boosters. I have the exact same utility setup as you. 6 heatsinks matches the 6 charges on my SCB's. Right now I have 2x 6a SCB's, I use the heatsink when I fire those off, but I still warm up to about 145% sometimes, and usually when I dock up after a round of CZ fighting I have 5-10% module damage every time. I'm starting to think that's just par for the course.
I'll have to try your sequencing.
I was.Sounds like you may be firing 2 SCB charges at the same time. Not sure but possible.
Glad to hear it. That was passed on to me at a Discord chat. I used to only go with the single SCB (which works fine, but two is finer).I was.
Was just in a CZ trying out Ozram's method and that worked like a charm. Fired off consecutive SCBs and didn't even overheat. Thanks Ozram!
Unless, of course, you want the extra capacity and the lighter weight...Anyone who uses A-class SCBs is doing it wrong
with B-class SCBs you get:
-better integrity
-better capacity (yup, one more cell makes all the difference)
-less power draw
-lower cost
all you have to trade in exchange:
-not as much capacity per cell
-mass
it's a no brainer
Is there a combination of SCB's and shield cell banks I can use which WONT make my ship overheat, and still deliver a meaningful charge to my 1800+ shields? Or am I chasing the impossible dream?
Heatsinks
Bind a single key to fire off both the SCB and heatsink ..... bye bye overheating
This is what I do (Python not Conda though), and it works beautifully![]()
Anyone who uses A-class SCBs is doing it wrong
with B-class SCBs you get:
-better integrity
-better capacity (yup, one more cell makes all the difference)
-less power draw
-lower cost
all you have to trade in exchange:
-not as much capacity per cell
-mass
it's a no brainer
Anyone who uses A-class SCBs is doing it wrong
with B-class SCBs you get:
-better capacity (yup, one more cell makes all the difference)
-less power draw
all you have to trade in exchange:
-not as much capacity per cell
-mass
it's a no brainer
I also use only B class, also mass is not an issue if you have +50 % FSD upgrade
Also, I do not use heat sinks, I use AFM unit to repair heat damage![]()
Also do not overcharge power plant to Grade 5, maybe Grade 3 is OK.
Grade 5 or A-class is not always best option![]()
Unless, of course, you want the extra capacity and the lighter weight...