The Star Citizen Thread v5

[Tippis]

Good job I didn't comment - I thought you were going with a desperately awful pun that even I wouldn't attempt!

:O

To be fair, that's probably a good reason why they never went that route — it would have seemed very bad-punny to anyone not familiar with the language.

http://www.antonis.de/qbebooks/gwbasman/tron.html

 

[dsmart]

So apparently there's a streamer now who is wondering why I haven't been stabbed yet. You know, because that's what should happen to critics of a project you're shilling.

 

[dsmart]

Some people seriously need to get a life, or at least get a grip on reality...

Or arrested, I'd be fine with that.

*edit* I think a lot of Twitch streamers don't realise what they are doing - they are broadcasting to viewers. As such they have the same responsibilities and liabilities as other broadcasting studios, and can be held to account for what they say.

Exactly.

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

Well considering their fan base I think it's a legit question. Just google Dimebag Darrell to see how fans react when they think someone has ruined their passion.

Also reporting him for that off the cuff remark makes you out to be a right plonker. He never advocated violence towards you in any way shape or form. i watched the video.

You don't know anything. Clearly.

Spend 5 mins reading the TwitchTV ToS, as well as the FCC guidelines on broadcasting. And for good measure, read up on what "republication" is. By the time you're done, even if your moral (which should tell you that it's not the sort of thing you should even repeat, let alone broadcast) compass is broken, you might still learn something.

Come back when you're done.

 

[dsmart]

He's not the one making threats, or defending the people who make the threats though is he.

Derek has a family, he'd be stupid not to report it to law enforcement.

Aside from that, Section 13 of the TwitchTV ToS is pretty clear.

 

[Vasea Azure]

*Tries to drag thread back to topic*

I think last week there was free to play time - anyone tried that and can comment on the flight model and fps? Anything improved? Do big ships feels like they have a mass yet?

 

[DLewth]

Ah, the thread's turned into a dumpster fire. I'll get a stick and some marshmallows.

 

[Marak]

I think last week there was free to play time - anyone tried that and can comment on the flight mode and fps? Anything improved? Do big ships feels like they have a mass yet?

I did try it on a friends computer and it looks like the FM changes haven't made it past the Avacados yet - ships are still paper light, the game crashes often and you can still fly in your underpants (though it's a bit harder to do now). Nipplejets are still a feature.

Apart from that it's pretty similar to what we had 6 months ago...

 

[Zyll Goliat]

I think last week there was free to play time - anyone tried that and can comment on the flight mode and fps? Anything improved? Do big ships feels like they have a mass yet?

Well I played last week....it´s still 2.5 so FM didn´t change at all only good thing is that I was able to try all flayable ships....and it was....ahhh kind a meh you know...FM are just to stiff and "ugly" its even worst when you flying bigger ships...well it was ok to fly around in asteroid fields but dogfighting feel same as before and thats FPS turreting fast-confusing rubish.....[wacko]

 

[Calebe]

Also the game is still PAY TO WIN. If you can buy every ship, can buy weapons for real cash and have life time insurance. That no matter what any anyone says is pure PAY TO WIN which they say it isn't. That is the biggest joke. It is pure and simple.
.
Calebe

 

[Necronaught]

Also the game is still PAY TO WIN. If you can buy every ship, can buy weapons for real cash and have life time insurance. That no matter what any anyone says is pure PAY TO WIN which they say it isn't. That is the biggest joke. It is pure and simple.
.
Calebe

Hate crime making a joke against whales.

 

[Marak]

Also the game is still PAY TO WIN. If you can buy every ship, can buy weapons for real cash and have life time insurance. That no matter what any anyone says is pure PAY TO WIN which they say it isn't. That is the biggest joke. It is pure and simple.
.
Calebe

You may say it's pay to win, I may say it's pay to win - But Chris says it isn't. So it isn't. Ha! Gotcha!

 

[Ian Phillips]

You will probably have noticed several posts disappearing, I'm not going to say anything more on the subject.

Please keep the discussions relevant to the game development.

Thank you.

 

[Osmanthus]

I think the game development is going badly

 

[Marak]

I think the game development is going badly

I agree.

 

[Jezzah]

I think the game development is going badly

The producing of mo-cap is going splendidly though - Roberts must feel like hes back in Hollywood again!

 

[Osmanthus]

The producing of mo-cap is going splendidly though - Roberts must feel like hes back in Hollywood again!

Im with you on the second thought but I'm not so sure on the first!

e: as in, there sure is a lot of it but it seems to be pretty poor quality from all we've heard

I agree.

So do I!

 

[DLewth]

I think the game development is going badly

I think you might be right.
The marshmallows came out OK though.

View attachment 113269

 

[Backer42]

<name> makes a good point. If they need cash sales to finish the game we should support it. Better the game gets finished.

This is the point where any reasonable publisher would cut his losses and pull the plug.

 

[Marak]

Im with you on the second thought but I'm not so sure on the first!

I also agree that the second bit is probably right, and I have no idea about the mocap. Overall I think the game development is going badly.

 

[Osmanthus]

This is the point where any reasonable publisher would cut his losses and pull the plug.

That quote is distilled sunk cost fallacy