Alien archeology and other mysteries: Thread 9 - The Canonn

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
just checked 58.2123 51.0289 too...

I think the working's out may be wrong - but the theory is still sound...

I think they are in the right direction though.

- - - Updated - - -



Dude that's awesome!

So we should check:

1) -31.8 51.1

2) 82.2 -128.9


Let's take a look ^^
wait, you need azimuth
supposed that ruins maybe will be on grean circle
-31.8; 51.1 and 82.2; -128.9 - it's two sets of coords on grean circle. They was chosen for simplicity
 
Last edited:
Yeah that was me with the photo :)

Yeah, just in case it wasn't clear, that's why I was winking! :)

But the guy who was asking about the obelisks near beacon 2 said it weren't the one on the picture I posted. That's why I was asking what exactly he means. Because I only know of these the pre- and post-patch ruins. But anyway. No sense in discussing this if the the guy who started talking about obelisks near beacon 2 doesn't answer.
Ah, it's just crossed wires. He's already answered, but you're probably looking at differently labelled versions of the map to him or something like that. On the old version of the site there were 2 triangular groups of obelisks near where Beacon 2 is on the current main image of the map of the current site on the front page. Here you go:

Current: https://imgur.com/a/RVZBN#6XexGII

Old: https://i.imgur.com/AJ8FuDK.png

Hope what he said makes sense in that context! :)
 
Last edited:
Your rank on the forums has no reflection on you as a person, or your capabilities as a player. Labelling most/all people with a forum rank with mostly harmless and below as "baiting" or "griefers" is not only ignorant, its pretty insulting. Just allow people to post their theories and chose to follow it or not. You could have politely asked for evidence, but instead you tried to discredit the CMDR on the basis of his forum rank?!?!? can you not see how this might be taken the wrong way?

I wondered where this would go overnight....

Actually, no, I didn't try to discredit them based on their forum rank. I was giving reasons why some people might be viewing it as a troll. Frankly what I saw was this:

- Player posts some fairly legit looking theorycraft, followed by a post of "guys I solved it" and not much else
- Others respond with, basically, "lol troll"
- Player (basically) says "What? Why?"
- Me: OK, this guy might be a troll, but based on his post history he seems more like a forum newbie

That's when I put up that list to try and help out. If you're reading it any other way, you read it wrong. Honestly, to help a legit player who's being accused of being a troll you kinda have to talk about the reasons why they might be appearing like that. But whatever. Apparently simply pointing out someone is "Mostly Harmless" (because that's what almost all disposable troll accounts are - one/occasional use disposable things) == Gross discrediting accusations and slander. I guess the English language changed overnight too...

Maybe my post was abrupt? I'll cop that, I tend to talk that way, especially when there's a lot of other wowzering going on, plus I was literally on my way to sleep. But if it's not clear, I was trying to help because pretty much exactly the same thing happened to me with the UA morse, being talked-down by some "Elite" poster who'd been doing this "much longer than me". Been there, done that, got the scars to prove it.

Anyway...

mclester: Based on the posts made overnight... those craters with the lumps at the base are usually just impact craters, and can be found almost anywhere. They're good landmarks to start searching from though.

Meanwhile the "Singing" is normal atmospheric noise when you're in orbital flight. I thought it was significant once when hunting for barnacles... best bet to see if it's something significant is go to a system you consider "insignificant", get =~ 10k from the surface with no music, have a listen and see if there's any major differences between what you hear there and here. If you find something, grab a screenie and throw it up. Hope that helps.
 
Last edited:
Pictures of decoded unknown probe signal incoming. I have used this picture to decode it:

http://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/h7fqRBygaYsdM8kuPS3DCb.jpg

Could not find the name of CMDR who founded it, so please name him for respect.

Those of You who are familiar with power grid and network grid will be able to process the picture and incorporate it in exact location.

Will you share or will keep it to yourself and just tease us just like the other guy, CMDR?
 
UNKNOWN PROBE SIGNAL DECODED

Unknown probe signal is extracted with spectral analyzer. It show us the city before its devastation with valuable astronomical data.
It is a single aerial picture (taken from above left when the sun was in the north-east region) and that shows 2 "clocks".
In the middle there is one astronomical observation, with relics as orientation points (under investigation if they have been used as triggering device).
On the right there is another one that looks like some kind of mechanical device, probably time based in connection to the first one.
We can only speculate if unknown probe is a distress beacon or in search for intelligent life.

Decoded signal:

2llc760.jpg


Position on the map (most probably):

25jl5w2.jpg


Respect to unnamed CMDR for the extracting this signal in the first place. O7

CMDR ExoForce sign off
 
Last edited:
So has it been confirmed that FD essentially fixed the duplicate mission rewards by releasing a cg then not allowing you to turn in your mission?

No. You can still hand the mission in, and you can leave the station, re-dock in the station, and get the mission again. You can also still get duplicate rewards by going to the site and scanning the obelisks again. Keep in mind that you won't get message notifications if you don't delete the previous messages, but your rewards will still go up.
 
UNKNOWN PROBE SIGNAL DECODED

Unknown probe signal is extracted with spectral analyzer. It show us the city before its devastation with valuable astronomical data.
It is a single aerial picture (taken from above left when the sun was in the north-east region) and that shows 2 "clocks".
In the middle there is one astronomical observation, with relics as orientation points (under investigation if they have been used as triggering device).
On the right there is another one that looks like some kind of mechanical device, probably time based in connection to the first one.
We can only speculate if unknown probe is a distress beacon or in search for intelligent life.

Decoded signal:

http://i67.tinypic.com/2llc760.jpg

Position on the map (most probably):

http://i64.tinypic.com/25jl5w2.jpg

What to look at:

http://i63.tinypic.com/2qwlris.jpg

Respect to unnamed CMDR for the extracting this signal in the first place. O7

CMDR ExoForce sign off

Why not using one of the much clearer pictures?

Like this:

http://imgur.com/9uBAkwo

As for me, it makes no sense at all.
 
Last edited:
UNKNOWN PROBE SIGNAL DECODED

Unknown probe signal is extracted with spectral analyzer. It show us the city before its devastation with valuable astronomical data.
It is a single aerial picture (taken from above left when the sun was in the north-east region) and that shows 2 "clocks".
In the middle there is one astronomical observation, with relics as orientation points (under investigation if they have been used as triggering device).
On the right there is another one that looks like some kind of mechanical device, probably time based in connection to the first one.
We can only speculate if unknown probe is a distress beacon or in search for intelligent life.

Decoded signal:

http://i67.tinypic.com/2llc760.jpg

Position on the map (most probably):

http://i64.tinypic.com/25jl5w2.jpg

What to look at:

http://i63.tinypic.com/2qwlris.jpg

Respect to unnamed CMDR for the extracting this signal in the first place. O7

CMDR ExoForce sign off

I've been trying to keep up with the thread as best I can, but I'm a bit lost here. Where was this probe found?
 
Maybe im wrong but i make a graphic i found:

longitude: -9° and 111°
latitude: -28 and 88

http://imgur.com/99rk4R4

That is brilliant! I'll check out those next :)

The way the triangles branch out in the centre does give it 3 angles all at 120 degrees (for each point), so your image is brilliant as it shows it.

So what we need to do is check:

Latitude: 88 / Longitude: -9

Latitude: -28 / Longitude: 111 /

so:

88 by -9

and

-28 by 111
 
Last edited:
As for me, it makes no sense at all.

I am with you there. I have no idea what he means. Especially not the "shows the city before the devastation". What city? What devastastion?
The data we gathered from the scans only mention the ancient sites to be part of the monolith network to communicate. Saying there was once a city there is pure speculation. Plus it doesn't really help us.
I don't know how the pictures he posted help us trying to solve this, find more ancient sites and data scans.
 
Why not using one of the much clearer pictures?

Like this:

http://imgur.com/9uBAkwo

As for me, it makes no sense at all.

Look at it like old monochrome photo, look at the shadows, see the gears on the right. This is the best I could do, the rest of the signal pictures were low quality.

Those of You who are familiar with power grid and network grid will be able to process the picture and incorporate it in exact location.

Edit: I give up..
 
Last edited:
I wondered where this would go overnight....

Actually, no, I didn't try to discredit them based on their forum rank. I was giving reasons why some people might be viewing it as a troll. Frankly what I saw was this:

- Player posts some fairly legit looking theorycraft, followed by a post of "guys I solved it" and not much else
- Others respond with, basically, "lol troll"
- Player (basically) says "What? Why?"
- Me: OK, this guy might be a troll, but based on his post history he seems more like a forum newbie

That's when I put up that list to try and help out. If you're reading it any other way, you read it wrong. Honestly, to help a legit player who's being accused of being a troll you kinda have to talk about the reasons why they might be appearing like that. But whatever. Apparently simply pointing out someone is "Mostly Harmless" (because that's what almost all disposable troll accounts are - one/occasional use disposable things) == Gross discrediting accusations and slander. I guess the English language changed overnight too...

Maybe my post was abrupt? I'll cop that, I tend to talk that way, especially when there's a lot of other wowzering going on, plus I was literally on my way to sleep. But if it's not clear, I was trying to help because pretty much exactly the same thing happened to me with the UA morse, being talked-down by some "Elite" poster who'd been doing this "much longer than me". Been there, done that, got the scars to prove it.

Anyway...

mclester: Based on the posts made overnight... those craters with the lumps at the base are usually just impact craters, and can be found almost anywhere. They're good landmarks to start searching from though.

Meanwhile the "Singing" is normal atmospheric noise when you're in orbital flight. I thought it was significant once when hunting for barnacles... best bet to see if it's something significant is go to a system you consider "insignificant", get =~ 10k from the surface with no music, have a listen and see if there's any major differences between what you hear there and here. If you find something, grab a screenie and throw it up. Hope that helps.

Yeah, it was always pretty obvious what you meant, and also pretty obvious that mclester was just someone new and enthusiastic. The way things have been read into and taken the wrong way today has been very very bizarre*.

*Put politely to avoid another swearing warning!
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom