They try an prove me wrong instead of making the easy dig? Or is that beyond you?
Alien archeology and other mysteries: Thread 9 - The Canonn
- Thread starter Ian Phillips
- Start date
- Status
They try an prove me wrong instead of making the easy dig? Or is that beyond you?
I'm sorry, I get into a discussion.
But science (physics) still do not know why light has a speed - that is. There's no explanation. Is the speed of light + -300k, but for some reason - do not know ???[yesnod][yesnod][yesnod]
Right or wrong this isn't the best of places. Someone popped out a old school astrolabe that resembles our ruins and no one seemed to notice.
Last edited:
FDev better do something quick! We have got people arguing about theories as if they were laws!
Keep in mind we still know very little about light (especially light in space) and very little about quantum things. I am not saying anyone is right or wrong, but remember mankind knows very very very..... very little about our universe.
Our understanding of light in space is pretty solid, it's why we have been able to get those pretty pictures of far off galaxy, and using our understanding, able to measure their composition and speed, this is where I jump in and back out of this particular subject.
This over and over. Please folks, if'n you want to argue who has the better grasp of science, go find a thread dedicated to that, likewise if you want to carry on about bugs and such, and leave this place for the discussion and sharing of info re the whole ruins thing.
Would be much appreciated.
That astrolabe is very interesting, but I don't have anything to add on that front atm!
Last edited:
For those looking for an intro to QM which is pretty accessible I recommend viascience. Here's a QM playlist
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL193BC0532FE7B02C
There are more on relativity, etc.
For those looking for something a little easier Veritasiums Quantum Entanglement and Spooky action at a distance
https://youtu.be/ZuvK-od647c
And the on the double slit experiment
https://youtu.be/Iuv6hY6zsd0
I now return you to your regularly scheduled game discussion
I really hope this "singing" that has been so frequently mentioned as associated with the ruins is not just the choral music we get when arriving at the destination of a programmed jump. That would be soooo disappointing.
BUT I'm still waiting to hear some recorded evidence.....
Last edited:
Thank You.
Try this one posted by BL1P just a few hours ago.
"singing" may be a grandiose term for it, its just what I picked up from others talking of it, and it stuck.
Last edited:
https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showthread.php?p=5052552&viewfull=1#post5052552
From 3:55, at least I think I'm on the same page as others regarding the singing, but as I explained, singing probably not the right term, melodic chatter I call it.
It is interesting. Especially that it's heard when you have music turned off
Did you log to see if it's persistent?
Looks pretty much like every other random crashed F63 POI that spawns. If you're hearing something different next to it, try and grab a recording.
It sure looks like a ship!
One of the small fighter classes, from the look of it.
Record the loop sound and post it for us!
And the morse!
Please!
The sound looks like a chant, i'll try to grab the sound. What software should i use?
What you mean? A relog? I'll try but i would love to record the sound first maybe
Last edited:
Road to California ( nebula) and find this !! when Fdev child play with crater tool [big grin]
seriously, what this grid ? path ? bug ? .... no POI so far
seriously, what this grid ? path ? bug ? .... no POI so far
Last edited:
Since the spheres are made of tiles and randomly generated, I'd say an oversight in making sure they don't get too many repeat tiles next to each other.
That's an excellent point (sorry to everyone bored of the Physics talk - it's a passion!). Hopefully I'm not repeating anything you already know here.
The standard model doesn't actually contain "c" as a constant, but really that has just moved the problem around. You still have 18 (26 if you factor neutrino masses IIRC) parameters to define the standard model which are, essentially, empirical.
There's a feeling amongst some physicists that this is too many, and whatever theory replaces & subsumes the standard model should ideally contain many fewer free parameters and thus give us a clearer idea of why the structure of forces and their relative strengths in our universe is what it is. But honestly we just don't know - maybe there really are 26 degrees of freedom and we're just imposing our views of mathematical elegance?
Since we are certain the standard model is not complete - since it doesn't contain gravity and cannot explain dark energy - perhaps its eventual replacement will solve the issue.
The origin of the fundamental physical constants is a great question. I have my own preferred explanations, but we just don't know, speaking scientifically. And for scientists, that's super awesome because they like doing science. Just like the Cannon! ;o)
- Status