Give it a rest Z, you're the one making outrageous claims. We're simply saying that generally accepted physics disagrees with you. I hate to have to roll this tired old chestnut out but... the onus is on the one making the claim to prove their claim, it is not on the others to disprove it.
By the way, I'm loving you telling us to go read a book! Brings back fond memories of what my old physics teacher said when he told the class something wrong and had it pointed out to him!
Also highly amused by you sending links over to primary school level stuff to try and educate us. I am literally laughing out loud! - you pitching it at the level is probably quite indicative of what the actual problem is!
And it's also great to see you once again claim to know the minds of others. Must be very comforting to be able to explain things away to yourself as being a fault in other people!
And just to say it again, I'm not arguing against stuff about eyes. What I am disputing is things you said about the speed of light. These things:
"Red light moves slower after it has been reflected or refracted."
"The only true source of red light traveling at the speed of light has to be emitted from its source as red light. Otherwise it is slower moving."
I simply pointed out that these statements aren’t correct. And they aren’t correct, because what you said is at odds with accepted Physics. You yourself posted something recently about how people making claims need to back them up. If you can prove what you’re saying then please do because it will revolutionise physics.
