Why? Beyond changing paint jobs and maybe weapons, SLF have no cargo space and come with stock equipment.I'd like to use a SLF to dock at a outpost.
It's like docking an SRV at a planet base. What would you want to accomplish?
Why? Beyond changing paint jobs and maybe weapons, SLF have no cargo space and come with stock equipment.I'd like to use a SLF to dock at a outpost.
And THAT is why it is failed. lol What is popular is cmdrs using small and medium ships. NOT large ones, especially not the big 3. You are basically pouring salt into an open wound. It is not easy ranking up to get these large ships or getting the credits to purchase them AND outfit them. Those of us with the big 3 would jump at ANY chance to access outposts via docking with them or accessing the mission board without docking. So the vote for large ship owners would be "yes" and the vote for large ship haters would be "no"
I have an Anaconda and I voted NO so your reasoning is false. Every ship has an opportunity cost. That's what makes the ships different from each other.
Having a little think I can see no reason why some planetary outposts shouldn't have large pads. If you can land a large ship right next to one why can't they build something you can build to land on in a station. It should depend on size and economy though as that outpost paying over the odds for goods to transported out would eventually hit the point where a costs/benefit analysis would justify the costs for a bigger pad.
It should be part of ongoing development of sites and would be inevitable where multiple players are running from them and creating a boom
I have an Anaconda and I voted NO so your reasoning is false. Every ship has an opportunity cost. That's what makes the ships different from each other.
.Disagree. Leave outposts for small and medium ships. In fact, we should also have outposts with only small pads if you ask me. Give small ships a purpose.