It comes and goes
I tried mapping it to x,y coords on the theory that it was leading me somewhere, ended up revisiting places it was strong and it had gone. Now you've heard it you may find you spot it more often!
Alien archeology and other mysteries: Thread 9 - The Canonn
- Thread starter Ian Phillips
- Start date
- Status
It comes and goes
I tried mapping it to x,y coords on the theory that it was leading me somewhere, ended up revisiting places it was strong and it had gone. Now you've heard it you may find you spot it more often!
Well any input welcome - sorry to any reading for spamming all the links - but, I'm hoping to spark someone else into making the leap my tired old brain can't make.
How's your Russian ? - this might be useful - Simulation of Russian Ternary computer Setun - http://en.trinary.ru/projects/setunws
edit this is probably more use - http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Ternary.html
specifically
Last edited:
Nope. The obelisks have exactly 4 stages. off, a side glowing, b side glowing, c side glowing. H cluster shows clearly that each of them face the same direction yet 2 of th starter obelisks have different sides glowing.
hes talking about the triangles in the symbols on the obelisks i believe
Yes - each "blue strip" as it were is the same as our digital style readout - just based in Ternary
A few questions for those of us considering brute forcing it...and any added thoughts of others.
What are the optimum settings (graphics settings, sound settings), and search pattern (altitude, etc).
Which of the systems has the fewest possible square m of area of all landable planets?
Is there any group systematic search going on of a planet or system?
Longitude is not universal (i.e. A ratio) when accounting for planet size, but latitude is, has anybody flown the same latitude on the various planets or taken a search?
For systematically scanning a planet, it seems like longitude is the way to go, but near the poles there would be overlap, and more possibly gaps near the equator. What is the reasonable scan width visually at the altitudes we are talking?
What are the optimum settings (graphics settings, sound settings), and search pattern (altitude, etc).
Which of the systems has the fewest possible square m of area of all landable planets?
Is there any group systematic search going on of a planet or system?
Longitude is not universal (i.e. A ratio) when accounting for planet size, but latitude is, has anybody flown the same latitude on the various planets or taken a search?
For systematically scanning a planet, it seems like longitude is the way to go, but near the poles there would be overlap, and more possibly gaps near the equator. What is the reasonable scan width visually at the altitudes we are talking?
I just went back to the ruins the other day for a refresher on what it looks like from different heights so I know what to look for.
I was originally scanning at 6 to 7km up and that's way too high for the xbox. The ruins are almost completely hidden.
2 to 3km is most ideal.
The terrain still loads slow and hi res doesn't kick in until you're under 1km, it seems.
Cudos to the cmdr that finds them first on Xbox, if it happens.
I was originally scanning at 6 to 7km up and that's way too high for the xbox. The ruins are almost completely hidden.
2 to 3km is most ideal.
The terrain still loads slow and hi res doesn't kick in until you're under 1km, it seems.
Cudos to the cmdr that finds them first on Xbox, if it happens.
Last edited:
We are speaking of the pattern. Not which side is glowing.
For reference : https://ixalon.github.io/elitedangerous/
No offence old chap but you aren't the first to proclaim he's 'solved the ruins' and then disappeared when the CG proved he was taslking out of his ****. Just sayin
I think we're still awaiting photographic proof that you've exceeded the 36 scans, found a system or ... anything at all.
Otherwise, please stop disturbing the workers kthxbai
Last edited:
6 maybe?
If we can figure out what number that represents we might have a start - is it balanced Ternary -1 0 1 or just 0 1 2 ?
and I'm guessing it's read top to bottom so first digit has one empty triangle and two filled 0,0,1 = 1 or 0,1,2 = 9 (? maybe - getting myself confused here) - hopefull someone gets what i'm driving at and can represent it better (and probably more accurately).
So, I take it, that to this point, none of Ram Tah's new ruins have been found?
I was thinking outside in, 2 sets of data.
Something like that?
https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showt...9-The-Canonn?p=4961953&viewfull=1#post4961953
Got it
Last edited:
Ohh apologies then yes, the triangles on the obelisk only have 2 stages as far as I know. The simulator is not correctly made as the dimmed triangles on the actual obelisk happen due to some glowing texture moving up the things behind the triangles changing. As far as I can notice.
Last edited:
Looking at this..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sierpinski_triangle#/media/File:Multigrade_operator_AND.svg
The squares are 4x4, so we could read in groups of 4 triangles from the center out, top down, left then right, or similar.
Edit: Aaand I posted before I tried to actually do anything with this only to realise of course you run out of triangles.. or get smaller and smaller triangles.
Last edited:
- Status