Synuefe ZL-J d10-119 has no landable planets with any moons, though. There are binaries, so this could be it. Perhaps Planet+Moon or Binaries?
Yes it does look again at the first 4 planets.
Synuefe ZL-J d10-119 has no landable planets with any moons, though. There are binaries, so this could be it. Perhaps Planet+Moon or Binaries?
You realise that posting random theories with no physical effort, and no actual work in-game to provide evidence to support your theory, is possibly more detrimental than posting nothing at all, right?
Sending players out to random coordinates because you don't have enough belief in your methods to do it yourself is pretty lazy in my mind.
Your diagrams look very pretty, convincing almost, but they aren't based on anything other than (flawed) hypothesis and randomly generated numbers that happen to fit your ideal.
Calling people out because they might not have solved the whole problem is petty at best, narcissistic and deluded at worst.
someone have tested to activate the all 8 beacons ? ( site 1 and 2 )
ram talk about " network "
EXCUSE ME! PREPARE FOR FLAME!
I have been doing nothing BUT checking the planets and co-ordinates in Synuefe ZL-J d10-119 FOR THE LAST 48 HOURS.
There is NO HARM in giving people co-ordinates they can check, IF THEY SO CHOOSE, OTHER THAN RANDOMLY FLYING OVER BEIGE *** PLANETS FOR HOURS ON END WITH NO CLEAR CO-ORDS.
I applied a compass and protractor to my working out and gave everyone a simplified picture - I even showed a picture earlier showing this.
OH MY GOD! PLEASE!
It's a good thought, but I can't see how it would work in-game since the instances reset when you supercruise away (at least in solo).
Now, you all should feel free to shoot me down. Here is my theory and the potential use of my theory.
On Ruin Site 1 We know the moon rises and sets from within the ruins. Now if one were to measure the angle between the moon orbit path to the yellow orbit 'do-dah' that encompasses a planet, one ends up with 45 degrees. Ahem, see image below.
https://i.imgur.com/XHfDzDs.jpg
I would gamble that this is the same on Ruin Site 2 - i need a time lapse video to do this.
If we are able to keep this 45 degree angle in orbital cruise we then have a path that the ruins can be on an only be on according to this theory.
..............
Made a new map simulating a FLIR system. Hope anybody founds it useful.
Warning, huge image.
http://i.imgur.com/rivtdot.jpg
right, it means we need to co-operate ? open or PG only ?
There is certainly the same degree offset when viewed from the center of the large mound to tower relic B4 that's centered on the moon when it's halfway above the horizon, I'm also beginning to think the moons are the true reference.
Made a new map simulating a FLIR system. Hope anybody founds it useful.
Warning, huge image.
http://i.imgur.com/rivtdot.jpg
C'mon people. Let it go. Or start using your ignore lists.
It'll reduce your blood-pressure, I promise!
And, y'know, someone will quote them if they say anything of interest.
No, think about what I said, when viewed from center of large mound, B4 is only centered on the moon when the moon 'halfway' above the horizon,Surely the instances don't stretch that far (and you wouldn't be able to communicate in-game)?
- - - Updated - - -
Still only gives us an orbit which all needs covering - though if we use the Rifter method that would probably not take too long. Though if all the sites are the same we might not find much (though we should as that would explain the site config & we could concentrate on activating obselisks).