Alien archeology and other mysteries: Thread 9 - The Canonn
- Thread starter Ian Phillips
- Start date
- Status
\o/ Just checking I'm not invisible
Who said that?
Probably just the wind.
It's one of the top candidates. One red dwarf short of a full match.
I don't think so, In fact, the copy we found, is either a mistake by a dev, or an actual copy instead of another ruin.
If its an actual copy, that means there are a lot more ruins out there, more than we need for the puzzle, we may be dealing with more than one set of ruins in every planet, we just haven't found them yet.
I refuse to count the second ruin as anything different than the first one we found, copy pasted to the last detail, even the data it gives, so, I believe that there are 5 different ruins, and multiple copies of each. -or- 4 different ruins without copies, but the fifth was a screw up by the devs.
Last edited:
Hi everyone! Im looking a way to unlock all the data. I use this img, and i unlock every piece in it. I see the spreadsheet in first page, but most of the obelisk are not "on", and the other ones doesnt work, im in SOLO btw. Is there any other spreadsheet or img for SOLO, so i can still unlocking data? Thanks
If anyone wants to compare with my results so far. IN SOLO !
Sorry if i got stuff wrong, My little head gets confused.
And the stupid messages are buggy so I dont pay much attention to which data came from where.
Might be helpful to someone.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1keI6mrGqtKZkNL5png3cMcPLfdiGlBniXJo_fc6WaJc
Sorry if i got stuff wrong, My little head gets confused.
And the stupid messages are buggy so I dont pay much attention to which data came from where.
Might be helpful to someone.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1keI6mrGqtKZkNL5png3cMcPLfdiGlBniXJo_fc6WaJc
Last edited:
That's the one I'd bet on for C22-17. It has a tidally locked moon like the three known sites. The only other landabale with a 'moon' is 10b and 10c, but they are really an equal-mass binary planet. Granted 3 data points are rough to extrapolate from, but AB 3 seems to match better.
For Synuefe ZL-J d10-119 I think 7d is the likely one as well due to it's tidally locked moon (7e).
How are people finding these sites?!
I've been slowly working on a theory but I'm just not fresh enough on math to do any more.
When plotted on a 2d graph, the coordinates look like the following:
View attachment 113864
Red indicates confirmed sites,
yellow are those coordinates mirrored across X
green are those coordinates with their +- signs switched.
To me it looks a lot like a piece of a sine wave or something, but I just don't remember how to do math like that anymore. Anybody else?
I've been slowly working on a theory but I'm just not fresh enough on math to do any more.
When plotted on a 2d graph, the coordinates look like the following:
View attachment 113864
Red indicates confirmed sites,
yellow are those coordinates mirrored across X
green are those coordinates with their +- signs switched.
To me it looks a lot like a piece of a sine wave or something, but I just don't remember how to do math like that anymore. Anybody else?
one question guys
Correct
one question guys
Correct I found that if I had the 13 mil already from site 1, site 2 gave nothing.
If i handded in the missions and re took it I could get 13 mil for site 2 but then site 1 did nothing.
Ok, so, what formula do you propose for the moon-track offset angle?
From my understanding, 44% of the radius of the planet scales up and down to give the same offset each time but I suspect that's a flawed perspective.
o7
- Status