Alien archeology and other mysteries: Thread 9 - The Canonn

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
last stupid question fo tonight - i promise - but is it true that for all 3 known sites the other sites (including the systemy called by Ram Tha) are visible over the horizon?

If you mean LOS then no its not true. The planets rotate and sometimes the other ruins are in LOS and sometimes not. Sometimes none are in LOS.
 
IC 2391 Sector ZE-A D101 C3

Casket+Urn - F12 - Biological 3/19

Just a note, the general combos didn't work for me on Site 1, so I don't know if this is an alternate combo.
 
14a is tidally locked too and T°C seem match better . my next one
good luck with THAT, according to my system-map it isnt landable ;)

If you mean LOS then no its not true. The planets rotate and sometimes the other ruins are in LOS and sometimes not. Sometimes none are in LOS.
Yep was talking about LOS. That the planets/moons rotate is clear, but if beeing tidally locked there would have been the chance that LOS is not lost upon rotation around their parent/parents rotation aroud main body....
 
Last edited:
good luck with THAT, according to my system-map it isnt landable ;)

Yep was talking about LOS. That the planets/moons rotate is clear, but if beeing tidally locked there would have been the chance that LOS is not lost upon rotation around their parent/parents rotation aroud main body....

Unless the ancient sites would be on the poles and the poles of the planets would point towards each other, it's not possible for a permanent LOS, tidally locked or not. But anyway, they don't always have LOS, hence why it's possible that maybe the moon is used to bounce the signals.
 
good luck with THAT, according to my system-map it isnt landable ;)

Yep was talking about LOS. That the planets/moons rotate is clear, but if beeing tidally locked there would have been the chance that LOS is not lost upon rotation around their parent/parents rotation aroud main body....

I checked that, there is no direct LOS all the time.
 
New alien relic ?

EliteDangerous64_2017_01_30_19_16_34_697_zpsxyuasexx.jpg
 
For those just logging on tonight and checking the forum.

Concerning Ruins for:

Synuefe XO-P c22-17 - I recommend D 2: Link For Reasons Why
its actually AB 3
View attachment 113871

I also noticed that this is another body that is close to 66%rock 33% metal (the other 2 with this ratio have ruins on them :)

i have scans for the 1st 4 landables in the system if required.
been pottering around -30/60 on AB3 for the last hour but nothing so far. (at least its light and the terrain is easy to spot stuff on.)
 
Might be better if non of us presume all alien ruins are on a planet, maybe some are orbiting, this is just a guess, and because I like curve balls + out of left field.

They will all be on landables, data is only achievable through srv scanner with certain items in hold. Might be something funky in space, but not a ruin site.
 
Indeed it is. It's a hacky way of getting the proper offset without restoring to full trig.

OK. So - my calculator works EXCEPT there's an issue.

I was assuming that some known detail about the orbital bodies would be used as the "starting point" for the moon orbit - the arg of periapsis for example, or even the arbitrary 0-degrees-longitude on the planet, but the only way (as far as I can tell) that I can start my curves off so they align reliably is through observation of at least a single point in the moon's orbit, then adjusting (courtesy the periapsis value I already put in) to line it up. That sounds hacky - there must be a way of aligning the moon orbit parametrically...


o7
 
OK. So - my calculator works EXCEPT there's an issue.

I was assuming that some known detail about the orbital bodies would be used as the "starting point" for the moon orbit - the arg of periapsis for example, or even the arbitrary 0-degrees-longitude on the planet, but the only way (as far as I can tell) that I can start my curves off so they align reliably is through observation of at least a single point in the moon's orbit, then adjusting (courtesy the periapsis value I already put in) to line it up. That sounds hacky - there must be a way of aligning the moon orbit parametrically...


o7

Is the moons orbit considered relative to 0,0 or do you need another data point to derive that from?
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom