I don't understand? How does moving away from a seasonal purchase system shaft lifetime pass owners?
I don't understand? How does moving away from a seasonal purchase system shaft lifetime pass owners?
Through the magic of internet forums!![]()
And the "surprise" with 2.4 will be ......
That's all folks, until 3 ..... which is not due out until Christmas next year![]()
The most important aspect of the Arma 3 DLC that you neglected to mention is that most of the work done in the expansion is made part of the base game for free to all players.
The only thing you actually pay for in the DLC is to be able to pilot some of the new jets or tanks that they add. This is to have something they can sell to make it worthwhile for them to invest the development resources to go back and do a major pass over a part of the game they feel is lacking, without actually having to paywall off all of the improvements and features they add.
If FD were to adopt the same practice, the way it would translate would be a role-focused mission system overhaul (say as part of 3.0 or 3.1) that would affect everyone who owns the game, but with people who fund the work by buying the season expansion would get access to a new ship or something, as well as whatever content is specifically earmarked for season 3. They already kind of do this since many of the changes that went into the horizons expansion altered the mechanics of the base game in ways that would have made it impossible to lock off from season 1 players. Horizons players only really paid for content that was completely new and could be filtered out from the start, like planetary landings.
So while I'd consider in a lot of cases I get a better deal from Arma DLC, and they tend to be much more upfront and concise about exactly what we're getting and when than FD have been, I can't say their methods of delivering content updates are strictly all that different as-is. The only major difference is that FD charges for all of their updates in a single season (which so far is working out to over a year each already) while the Arma devs charge for each of their DLC updates separately with no subscription model required to keep the game fully up to date with the newest features. I'm not sure what FD would change to make their offerings more appetising but that might be one avenue worth exploring if they're up for it.
It means that 3.0 will probably be a full expansion with no point updates. We will have to wait until the whole of 3.0 is completed in house and released as one massive expansion.
No more point updates, but lifetime expansion owners should still get it, they paid for all expansions, regardless of how they are marketed or released.
Sure we'll keep it, but its soon utterly pointless.
All FD had to do was tell us from the beginning that we were supporting their console game, and many of us would have never participated.
so instead of £40 for a year, we'll get ripped off at £10 per 0.1 update
sad thing is theres prob people dumb enough to think we are saving and fdev are doing it to benefit the players
Presumably, lifetime pass owners will get the content regardless of the delivery strategy...right?
I find it staggering that they are thinking of changing the season expansions because some people whine and moan about spending £40 to get a years worth of updates.
..the same people who toss away £80 a week on candy crush and other freemium trash on their phone. ugh.. crazy.
if it's not broke, don't fix it![]()
They're changing the season pass model because season passes don't make for good publicity. Season passes ask you to pay for the promise of future content, it's rather shady business and tends to generate more skepticism and cynicism than goodwill amongst your customers.
But between sales of ED+H on various platforms + Planet Coaster, Frontier must be sitting on a comfortable money cushion which should now allow them to slow down on the whole preorder thing and instead start selling features after they are done developping them, or at the very least sell them one at a time.
I don't see why you as a customer would get upset over this. As a LEP owner things wont change for you anyway, and for the rest of us it means we'll be able to have a more granular say in the way we support the game. And it also means Frontier feels more confident in their ability to go through the year without having to ask players for one big advance.
The decision to drop the season pass model, whether Frontier splits development into multiple paid modules or goes for a big yearly expansion (or both) is a good thing for you, for Frontier, and for the future of the game.