I would far prefer them have a temporary outage, than have them take their ball and go home and leave whoever comes next to try to spin something up from scratch over the course of weeks or months. Saying that they resorted to "extortion" or "terrorism" by saying "you're making the work we're volunteering to do, unpaid, harder than it needs to be" is ridiculous, and akin to showing up to a soup kitchen, upending the trash cans all over the floor, and yelling at the volunteers "YOU CHOSE TO DO THIS FOR FREE YOU DON'T GET TO COMPLAIN ABOUT IT, NOW CLEAN IT UP". The fact that we've somehow filled a thread with more than a hundred pages of people incapable of realizing they're not entitled to other people's time and effort is just icing on this entire ridiculous cake.
Ok, so FD have committed now its the 3rd Party Tools too.
So you the developers can now promise that if FD commit, you will commit that these sites and tools will continue to be developed till the end of Elites development ( 7 more years going by DB ).
No leaving the tools, when a new game comes out that you move to play.
You commit to the player base that these tools will stay online line and bugs and new features will be added while Elite is still running.
Let see if you commit too the users of your 3rd party tools.
Ok, so FD have committed now its the 3rd Party Tools too.
So you the developers can now promise that if FD commit, you will commit that these sites and tools will continue to be developed till the end of Elites development ( 7 more years going by DB ).
No leaving the tools, when a new game comes out that you move to play.
You commit to the player base that these tools will stay online line and bugs and new features will be added while Elite is still running.
Let see if you commit too the users of your 3rd party tools.
This isn't about caving,
The only thing FDev has committed to is maintaining an open dialogue with 3rd Party Devs.
Well said sir. It's galling/incredulous that some people think this was an attempt at extortion.
If these people are not interested in the tooling provided by 3rd parties, why would it affect them at all, and why care when a blackout is enacted?
Oh because it affects them and their enjoyment, hence the outrage and name calling. Which in turn are acknowledgements of the importance of the tooling's existence.
Hats off to the both sides for bringing this to a swift conclusion. I believe the way it was gone about was exactly the impact needed to highlight the situation and get an understanding of its importance to the game. A pamphlet campaign via the forums would not have had this response.
I think the right result was achieved... Fdev working more closely with 3rd party Devs and websites, though I can't help but feel the approach was approaching the level of blackmail, with (presumably) many CMDRs looking to use said tools to prepare their ships for the Premonition event.
Regardless, given the rapid growth of the thread in the space of an afternoon, it's clear that the 3rd party element does in fact play a critical role in supporting us in ED... and the fact we absolutely need such tools indicates a gap.
After speaking in private with the OP and other involved community developers, we have all agreed that it was best for the community to bring the websites back up as soon possible. This will be happening simultaneously at 19:00 UTC (where possible) for all the sites.
We have made a commitment to work more closely with the third party developer community to address concerns and support these features which the community use and value on a daily basis.
These ongoing communications will include developers from other third party websites who may be interested, not just those listed in the OP. If you are an active and established third party Elite Dangerous developer, get in touch with community@frontier.co.uk
We all hope that clears things up!
Thanks everyone,
Ed
I would far prefer them have a temporary outage, than have them take their ball and go home and leave whoever comes next to try to spin something up from scratch over the course of weeks or months. Saying that they resorted to "extortion" or "terrorism" by saying "you're making the work we're volunteering to do, unpaid, harder than it needs to be" is ridiculous, and akin to showing up to a soup kitchen, upending the trash cans all over the floor, and yelling at the volunteers "YOU CHOSE TO DO THIS FOR FREE YOU DON'T GET TO COMPLAIN ABOUT IT, NOW CLEAN IT UP". The fact that we've somehow filled a thread with more than a hundred pages of people incapable of realizing they're not entitled to other people's time and effort is just icing on this entire ridiculous cake.
Could the developers have gotten the same response by posting on the forums without a direct link from their sites? It's impossible to say, now. Maybe other methods would have been sufficiently efficacious, maybe they would not have been. Ultimately, though, 3rd party developers are not and should not be expected to provide free service, both in terms of hosting and development time, for everyone's benefit. If you disagree with their points and think you can write a replacement for their site without needing to involve FDev, the same information they're using is available for you to consume as well; you're welcome to write a replacement and maintain it if you think that their method of calling attention to their potential burnout is so personally offensive. Alternatively, if you think the service they provide is worthless and unnecessary, why do you even care enough to argue here? If someone's providing a useless and unnecessary extension for something, and then complains about that thing being too hard to interface with, the most effective way of getting them to go away is by ignoring them, not arguing with them. (The fact that the developers use the services in question does indicate that it is not, in fact, useless; but that's another topic entirely.)
I share most player's views that the third party tools are invaluable. And, I called on both FD and the out of game developers to work the issue out. But, that does not excuse the OP's group from deliberately using their sites visitors from using our need, to further their goals. I contend the OP's group would have had the same results, without the strike. A thread to ask for community support would have worked, and been appropriate.
Compelling us to join in with them, or lose their sites is the definition of extortion.
So could Ozric's post. I could have done without reading such ignorance.Could have been a PM to Ed instead of a public one...