Not exactly. You described it in your OP as "a game" or a tactic with the explicit intention of derailment. My argument, is that derailment is never my intention, I just don't take most threads as seriously as some, particularly those who would use the forum as a soapbox.
Sure, the mods can decide, but in reality threads that don't fit into the categories that I outlined (ie reasonable threads made by people who are here because they enjoy being here) police themselves. As opposed to threads made by people who are only posting to tell everyone why they hate being here.
Is it derailment is the first poster agrees with you? You seem to be implying by omission that it's not. See, I do this all the time. Not to derail, simply because I don't consider anything said in a game forum important enough for more consideration.
In a thread with active and varied participation from a number of posters, these posts get lost in the noise to everyone not interested in them. No big deal.
Ok.... you might have a point with this one, but realistically, if you fall for it by responding, I wouldn't be hopeful that your original point would be worth the effort.
Or... some people are capable of skimming past fluff and are surprised that others seemingly can't maintain concentration in the face of the slightest of distractions. Must be a millennial thing. Go figure.
Sure, because the mods would never be able to make up their own minds without the help of this thread.
What would they do without you? Collect your forum medal at reception.![]()
apart from my statement 'we finally got there, and in the end, it was you that said it ' was in reference too you posting a banter here... and why you here doing it. follow backward the quote path we took
'Here's the thing... while I could PM Red and carry on the conversation in private, I don't consider 99% of the threads on here worthy of making that effort in' an onward mainly
we got down to your motive for the friendly batter, and it was because you didn't think the thread was 'worthy'... thus, you where using banter too.. well in this case, be a smarty pants... but it showed us why you where doing it
...i see what your doing here, clouding the current flow... taking what what formed/discussed later on in the topic and bluntly aplying it to the Opening post, in the hopes it looks like you are correct.
Added:-----below, just a bit of fun--- see i have a sense of humor
This is how the thread went\/
[video=youtube;jvipPYFebWc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvipPYFebWc&list=PL0805FB61D7503BC2&index=11[/video]
Last edited: