So after reading through all the data derived from the sites I think you are correct. While undoubtedly language can be explained numerically it is best to devise a translation manual. Unfortunately this does mean that any data contained in the glyph are awaiting further 'language' discovery. The glyphs are apparently derived from the world around them, like the glyph for moon is said to be derived by the moon rising and falling on thier homeworld. It's almost impossible to derive that with single color 36 pixels where the moon is represented by the motion of the pixels. There are 2^36 possible words these glyphs can mathematically achieve.
The data also states that not only does a glyph represent a word but how it manifests in the context of other glyphs adds additional meaning to the glyph. As much as I would love to be able to sit here for hours on end working towards a solution I fear this one is a dead end for the time being. I could model the words in a binary form and even represent the transformations. But ultimately you still need to know what each glyph truly means in order to unlock the meaning. The equivalence is A ^ B = C where the value A is a binary representation of the word. The Boolean operation ^ and value B represents the operation required to derive the true meaning C. However without knowing what A and B are C (the ultimate meaning) can never be derived.
Just on the Guardians' language, a while back I did a fairly exhaustive extraction and some analysis is of everything language related from the Ram Tah messages. Includes direct info and also other influencing factors from all the data types. All documented here if anyone's interested:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qc1jaHHP0ETSxycXR1x_6wSfiS1F6yTlxLos2rAVuf0
It's not in the stuff that I put together for the FP as there's not been any peer review as yet and it wouldn't be the done thing to put it up there without it!
Last edited: