Yes I did. Honestly, I don't see how me saying that rarity does not automatically equal high value is being construed as rarity cannot equal high value. All of your examples are for rare items that were in high demand, largely due to added value to someone's production (goods, services, status) therefore they could support high price points. There are plenty of rare items that are not in demand by anyone, and do not have a high value. It is no different than the mistake commonly made by people getting into the antiques markets, where they have to learn (usually at the expense of painful losses) that being very old does not automatically mean that it is very valuable.
And yes, I can be reasonably sure that no one within 200 miles of where I live has paid $20,000 USD for a watermelon or $4,000 USD for a strawberry.
The fact that you started your post with pounding out a double fisted "OH GOD" should explain things I guess.
That incredibly naive statement is based on what exactly?
(unless you live 200 miles from any large conurbation) Either way you knew exactly what I meant in my previous comment and if you've watched any US TV at all over the last 20 years you'd know you have no idea the things people buy / collect / do and get up to in thier own privacy.
I agree in some cases rarity doesn't
automatically = high value - like your painting from your childhood, or my wooden aeroplane, but you are using this as an argument for how this translates for rare commodity trading and the two are so utterly different as to not deserve being uttered in the same breath, which is what you are doing.
The very fact that there are traders at the other end of 20,000 LY willing to PAY FOR the goods = DEMAND.
IT'S THAT SIMPLE.
It's NOT the OP's fault that the trading system FDev have devised is so simplistic that it cannot cater for the complexities that normally occur in real life -
In real life people buy items they think are good sellers and end up losing thier shirts all the time, just as you say with some antiques.... BUT there are exceptions that prove the rule all the time, which explains why container loads of old furniture from the UK and Europe are being shipped to America by their thousands.
Buy here - take it down the block = no sale.
Take it across the city = few sales
Take it across the state = few more sales
Take it the other side of the country = even more sales
Take it across an ocean = LOTS of sales.
The only factor here is how easy it is to get from A to B?
It's been this way for millenia my friend - I'm sorry you won't accept the facts in front of your face, but facts they are. Even your unidentified indiginous peoples knew the basic premise for trading.
If OP had taken the "rares" bought from system A and taken them 20k ly and the trading system there went "NOPE" - he'd have been stuffed and mad and might have complained....
HOWEVER if the OP knew that FDev had designed a trading system complex enough that there was a possibility he could take those same 27 rares to planet X in a different system - where trader there might have gone... "JACKPOT!! I'll give you 2 million Cr EACH." then going that far into the black would be worth it.... maybe.
A bit of history for you.... in Frontier Elite II you had occasions whereby you'd have taken commodity X someplace (even the next system) and there would have been a bulletin board announcement:
JOE SCHMOE - will pay 3x the normal market value for X commodity (which could be ANYTHING).
So demand and availability was a factor for trading in the previous Elite games... but not this one.
Edit - Every single real world example of distance and rarity commodities I have mentioned are all true - I'm certain you've not googled them to check for yourself that I'm not blowing smoke up your rear, but maybe you should because you live in a capitalistic society and one day that baseline understanding might save you from losing your own shirt.
I have no idea what you mean by:
The fact that you started your post with pounding out a double fisted "OH GOD" should explain things I guess.
it was the verbal eqivalent of *stares in disbelief at what you just said - from someone who claims to be a successful markets trader*