[FUN] Would you play Elite Dangerous if, as with 1984, you could only fly the Cobra Mk III?

  • Thread starter Deleted member 110222
  • Start date
play in VR and the answer is apparent...... ;)

(I love the cobra but most of the cockpits in ED offer a different experience...

claustrophobia in the eagle / taipan
decadence in the clipper/cutter
that "startrek" bridge feeling in the anaconda
(or the sailing an oil tanker feeling)
or the shear amazing view in the Lakon ships.

Not enough can be said about the cockpit experience in VR. I think a lot of people in the "it doesn't really matter what ship you fly" or "why is owning all the ships a big deal when you can do everything in a ____" crowd have never experienced VR before. There's a reason I farmed Smeaton to build out my fleet. That reason is VR.
 
If Crime & Punishment is introduced the way it is proposed for 3.0 at present, we will all be doing a lot more flying in Cobras to avoid high bounty penalties !
 
If Crime & Punishment is introduced the way it is proposed for 3.0 at present, we will all be doing a lot more flying in Cobras to avoid high bounty penalties !
Haha... yeah, with them nerfing passenger missions... even though I built my fleet on the back of passenger missions, now I'm afraid to do anything in them! So now it's

1. Travel to system in jump-hauler...
2. Order my ships to be delivered safely...
3. Run away at the first sign of anything dangerous...
4. Stop playing the game until they re-introduce a way to earn enough capital to play the game with any level of personal relaxation XD
 
Honestly I would.

Don't expect this to be a serious thread. 'Tis just a laugh.

But would you?

If I had no choice I off course would.
As far as spacesims go Elite is the only serious game in town for me.
Number one selling point is the huge true to size procedural galaxy.
I love the idea of flying around in endless space and Elite is the only game that gets the psychology of that feature right.

Most other spacesims use a very limited down scaled box system, including the X games and Star Citizen.
You are not an explorer of the galaxy in those games, but someone who flies through a few interconnected boxes and will have visited them all in a very limited time.

But I do love the fact that we have many ships to choose from, and to play around with.
I would hate to lose that.
 
If I had no choice I off course would.
As far as spacesims go Elite is the only serious game in town for me.
Number one selling point is the huge true to size procedural galaxy.
I love the idea of flying around in endless space and Elite is the only game that gets the psychology of that feature right.

Most other spacesims use a very limited down scaled box system, including the X games and Star Citizen.
You are not an explorer of the galaxy in those games, but someone who flies through a few interconnected boxes and will have visited them all in a very limited time.

But I do love the fact that we have many ships to choose from, and to play around with.
I would hate to lose that.
Yes. Removing ship variety removes the failure state of this game (which I'd be fine with personally, but I understand other's desires here). The only thing you'd lose from a total re-roll would be modules and "rank progress." Now, don't get me wrong, progression in this game is SUPER faffed up on it's face, but a single ship experience would mean that you'd lose that "fear of losing your big ship to rebuy" (which, again, I'd be fine with!).
 
I might play the game. But I probably wouldn't hang around on the forums. Because the forums would be full of people saying "I've got quadrillions of credits, why can't I buy a bigger ship?".
 
Back
Top Bottom