I see lots of folks defending, or at least downplaying, the UA bombing on the grounds that it is reversible and/or has no real effect on the overall goal of the mission or the purpose of the memorial. All of which is true.
On the other hand, if it was possible to destroy megaships in this game the Dove Enigma would now be a smoking pile of wreckage assets, quite possibly pushed around to spell out LOL and with a video uploaded to YouTube. I can already hear people crying, "That's just speculation!" Yes it is. But we all know it's 100% on the money. If something can be done in this game, sooner or later someone will do it.
The only unknown here, as far as I know, is the motive of the instigator(s).
If -- and it's a very small if given the scenario -- what happened here was simply someone UA bombing a new in-game asset without awareness the reason for its creation, then it's a shame that it's led to all this. UA bombing is a legitimate game action, just as asset demolition would be if the code permitted it.
But if, as is far more likely, it was an action undertaken with the intent of trolling a cancer victim then it is morally reprehensible. And regardless of any efforts by the community to reverse it, regardless of which way FD decide to move, regardless of whether certain members of the community actively relish their own amorality, it remains a morally reprehensible action. No amount of analysis will change that.
On the other hand, if it was possible to destroy megaships in this game the Dove Enigma would now be a smoking pile of wreckage assets, quite possibly pushed around to spell out LOL and with a video uploaded to YouTube. I can already hear people crying, "That's just speculation!" Yes it is. But we all know it's 100% on the money. If something can be done in this game, sooner or later someone will do it.
The only unknown here, as far as I know, is the motive of the instigator(s).
If -- and it's a very small if given the scenario -- what happened here was simply someone UA bombing a new in-game asset without awareness the reason for its creation, then it's a shame that it's led to all this. UA bombing is a legitimate game action, just as asset demolition would be if the code permitted it.
But if, as is far more likely, it was an action undertaken with the intent of trolling a cancer victim then it is morally reprehensible. And regardless of any efforts by the community to reverse it, regardless of which way FD decide to move, regardless of whether certain members of the community actively relish their own amorality, it remains a morally reprehensible action. No amount of analysis will change that.