Privateer’s Alliance Charity Event Targeted for Griefing

Stop using the game as charity and 'good causes' platform. We are here to play the game and have fun and not endure a never ending set of charity events or memorial services.

Frankly its become obvious this sort of thing is little more than virtue signalling and I find that somewhat insidious.

At the very least if people are doing these charity things then it shouldn't be imposed on others.

We don't. We do the charity on twitch. It's just that the people participating all play elite. Suck it up, be a nicer human being, break out your wallet, donate to a good cause.
 
Good luck to you. Would like ED not to be a charity platform though, really.

Then again I guess I can ignore it entirely if I wish.

Hope you make a few £$€
 
Last edited:
We don't. We do the charity on twitch. It's just that the people participating all play elite. Suck it up, be a nicer human being, break out your wallet, donate to a good cause.

For your information I give up some of my free time weekly and volunteer for a charity, it requires more effort than clicking a few buttons and donating. What I don't do is hijack a computer game for my own self aggrandizement so I can brow beat other folks who have bought a computer game to play that said game.

There are many ways to help support good causes. I don't think its appropriate for an online computer game to be endlessly targeted with charity events or death bed wishes, particularly since it more often than not ends up in a brow beating session with those holding these events imposing this sort of stuff on others.

UA bombing is a valid gameplay mechanic. Deal with it.
 
Don't like it, then don't donate or watch any streams that are participating. I highly doubt there's anyone out there anywhere forcing you to participate in voluntarily watching people stream on twitch.
 
Don't like it, then don't donate or watch any streams that are participating. I highly doubt there's anyone out there anywhere forcing you to participate in voluntarily watching people stream on twitch.

I'm not the one kicking up a fuss and expecting special in game treatment because of things going on outside of it and using it as a way to pejoratively label other players of the game.

Also I feel rather uncomfortable with people using charity events to virtue signal, which is all this really is I'm afraid.
 
Last edited:
I'm not the one kicking up a fuss and expecting special in game treatment because of things going on outside of it and using it as a way to pejoratively label other players of the game.

Neither is PA, read the response from the wing leader. It's the community at large. Sounds like PA welcomes the attention and the emergent game play the UA bombing will bring. I think if you actually read all that you won't find any official from PA labeling anyone, in fact quite the opposite, the wing lead went out of his way to comment on the one orchestrating the UA bombing as a nice guy and well within the rules of the game to do what he's doing. Seems to me that PA isn't the one kicking up a fuss over this.

So I'll just reiterate what I said previously: don't like it, don't watch. It's really that simple.
 
I'm not the one kicking up a fuss and expecting special in game treatment because of things going on outside of it and using it as a way toejoratively label other players of the game.

Not the official position of Privateer's Alliance. They aren't demanding special attention or relief from an in-game mechanic. Just advertising their charity event for you to participate or not.

https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showthread.php/407472-Privateer-s-Alliance-Charity-Event-UA-Bombing-and-a-Chat-with-the-Lord-Commander-of-PA

Complaints for the mechanic are coming from elsewhere, because people want to hyperventilate.
 
Be cool if you did something that you don't normally do (i.e. play ED) for charity.

But, I mean, it's all good. Just feels a little bIt, I dunno, maybe a bit 'look at us, ain't we great doing this what we normally do for charity'.

I'm sure it's not like that at all, but it could come across that way.
 
Last edited:
He lives in Manchester, England so its not exactly hard.

@Red remember the good times we had in the other game nuking drone events with all the colos and cylons sitting about singing kumbaya, good times.

I'd love to see what the forum reaction would've been had some of elites players been there.

I shudder to think.

One of the best laughs I've ever had in this game was when I saw an npc in a res site say 'but I was only mining!' for the first time. Brought back so many memories.
 
I shudder to think.

One of the best laughs I've ever had in this game was when I saw an npc in a res site say 'but I was only mining!' for the first time. Brought back so many memories.

Man if that was the other game we would've dropped a jump beacon on it NPC or not.
 
Appreciate the assist there, Damon8r!

So yeah... some of the responses in here I've seen are disturbing... The commander who is going to be doing this has every right to, charity work or not. Our charity also doesn't hinge on our stations working. I do appreciate the support, I really do, but respect for play style trumps in my book. Privateer's Alliance mantra is 'Play your own way, but play together'. So while we do thank you for the respect for the event and the offers for help, we also would appreciate it if labels and for the insane calls for use of law enforcement for something as trivial as an action in a video game be dropped.

I've had convos with the person who is doing the bombing. He has an agenda, he has purpose, but most important, he's not a bad person despite what he might do in a video game. We respect that, even though it's targeted at us as a group. Stuff happens, we'll fight back, life moves on. I was hoping that this would turn into discussion more about the charity and heart health, but it's the forums, so... yeah.

https://www.privateersalliance.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/PA_on_heart_black_outline.png

Here's to keeping your hearts healthy. Don't fight on the forums, it raises blood pressure, it makes life way more difficult than it needs to be. And for gods sake, just enjoy the game, the good and the bad.

Also, the steps we have taken to fight back:
1. We've got bank accounts (spare ED accounts that have T9's or cutters) filled with MAs, last count was at 3000+
2. We have an RSS feed to watch for our station shutdowns
3. We talked with the person behind it. Offered no ill will for the event, and are going to use this to further our cause, show how well Privateer's Alliance works together and why our charities are worthy of support

There you go, that's the right way to answer.

Crying over a perfectly legitimate game mechanic isn't accomplishing anything.

Good luck with your charity Philt0r.
 
We don't. We do the charity on twitch. It's just that the people participating all play elite. Suck it up, be a nicer human being, break out your wallet, donate to a good cause.

I think what he meant is that since you guys are mostly all Elite Dangerous players, you are inherently using the game as a medium to reach out for donations, which in some way is totally in your right.

However, it does feel like Frontier has the tendency to give special treatments to people using Elite as a platform for charity these days, which honestly might be good for publicity but is a tiny bit annoying for all the rest of the players out there looking for an equal footing in this universe.

Do I get jealous for not being able to have my own megaship, no, but it seems a bit unfair (in my opinion) for the rest of the community... not being able to enjoy these same very thing's.
 
Last edited:
Regarding heart disease...

"Linus Pauling and Matthias Rath first alerted the world to the cause of heart disease in 1989 -- a chronic, sub-clinical vitamin C deficiency -- due to a missing liver enzyme caused by the ancient GULO genetic defect in primate DNA. [1]

Pauling, the founder of modern chemistry, holder of 48 honorary Ph.D.s, and the world's only 2-time unshared Nobel prize laureate, theorized that too little vitamin C elevates cholesterol levels, including the Lp(a) variant that causes narrowing of blood vessels.After Pauling learned that Lp(a) binds to strands of lysine protruding from weak and damaged blood vessels, he invented the high-lysine therapy described here."

http://www.paulingtherapy.com/
 
I think what he meant is that since you guys are mostly all Elite Dangerous players, you are inherently using it as a medium to reach out for donations, which in some way is totally in your right.

However, it does feel like Frontier has the tendency to give special treatments to people using Elite as a platform for charity these days, which honestly might be good for publicity but is a tiny bit annoying for all the rest of the players out there looking for an equal footing in this universe.

Do I get jealous for not being able to have my own megaship, no, but it seems a bit unfair (in my opinion) for the rest of the community... not being able to enjoy these same very thing's.

I do kinda know what you mean. As a roleplayer (from other games before this as well) it does leave me with a strong sense of meta-gaming.

I'm all for good will and good press, but there are ways to do it that don't disturb other people's ability to play fairly under the rules that are set by the game, from within the game.

If FDev wants to get involved and put something together, that's cool, it just needs to be done with great care and transparency. No one should be setting up a charity that could possibly fail, by not meeting an arbitrary goal within the game, that is completely with someone's rights to try and impede (as long as they aren't cheating,) unless part of the charity event is the challenge that it might fail--which is a valid way to go, as you can earn a lot and get a lot of participation/interest by making something more dramatic that way--but don't do it unless you are confident you can succeed, because you can't complain if you don't--no one playing the game inherently owes anyone cooperation with anything (regardless of how much of a it may make them seem like to refuse it).
 
Last edited:
I do kinda know what you mean. As a roleplayer (from other games before this as well) it does leave me with a strong sense of meta-gaming.

I'm all for good will and good press, but there are ways to do it that don't disturb other people's ability to play fairly under the rules that are set by the game, from within the game.

If FDev wants to get involved and put something together, that's cool, it just needs to be done with great care and transparency. No one should be setting up a charity that could possiblyfail, by not meeting some arbitrary goal within the game, that is completely with someone's rights to try and impede (as long as they aren't cheating,) unless part of the charity event is the challenge that it might fail--which is a valid way to go, as you can earn a lot and get a lot of participation/interest by making something more dramatic that way--but don't do it unless you are confident you can succeed, because you can't complain if you don't--no one playing the game inherently owes you cooperation with anything (regardless of how much of a it may make them seem like to refuse you).


yea exactly my point but it doesn't feel that way with frontier.

it's also only a matter of time before someone take advantage of fdevs good will.
 
Last edited:
OK, so let me summarise the responses so far in order to attempt to achieve a consensus across the entire community.

The options - radically different though many may be - are that:

(A) Frontier should impose a ban - to be rigorously policed - of all financial fund-raising using their product, to include most obviously charity fundraising.

(B) Frontier should create a new mode - 'CHARITY' - within which all forms of direct and indirect PvP are forbidden, including UA bombing but also any other kind of BGS attack and, obviously, Orcas, Clippers, not to mention (obviously again) Fer-de-Lances. Actually, hard points are banned. As well as collisions. Did I mention Cutters? Frontier to decide case-by-case which good causes are sufficiently good to qualify for Developer-guaranteed-immortality-plated-immortality. (Noting that if they approve one yet refuse another, someone will probably go to the press. Realistically in the UK at least they'll have to approve anything to do with pets.)

(C) Frontier should state publicly that they will only permit matters to continue as now ... organically ... if all charity fundraisers understand and agree that anything goes in ED. One last chance ... any more complaints from charity fundraisers and option (A) applies.

(D) Frontier should do as they always should have done. Now is the time to make all systems, players, stations and ships immune to all forms of hostility in all circumstances. The charities will be saved, but only as part of a wider salvation. Heaven awaits!

(E) Perma-ban all PvP griefers.

(F) Perma-ban all UA bombers, zerg swarmers, goons, BGS attackers, authority-ship-killers, Powerplay 5th columnists, thread spammers, mod-pesterers and reddit brigaders.

(G) Ban everyone and everything except me, my Cobra III and DBOBE. (At last, we might meet...!)

.
.
.

Did I miss anything out?
 
OK, so let me summarise the responses so far in order to attempt to achieve a consensus across the entire community.

The options - radically different though many may be - are that:

(A) Frontier should impose a ban - to be rigorously policed - of all financial fund-raising using their product, to include most obviously charity fundraising.

(B) Frontier should create a new mode - 'CHARITY' - within which all forms of direct and indirect PvP are forbidden, including UA bombing but also any other kind of BGS attack and, obviously, Orcas, Clippers, not to mention (obviously again) Fer-de-Lances. Actually, hard points are banned. As well as collisions. Did I mention Cutters? Frontier to decide case-by-case which good causes are sufficiently good to qualify for Developer-guaranteed-immortality-plated-immortality. (Noting that if they approve one yet refuse another, someone will probably go to the press. Realistically in the UK at least they'll have to approve anything to do with pets.)

(C) Frontier should state publicly that they will only permit matters to continue as now ... organically ... if all charity fundraisers understand and agree that anything goes in ED. One last chance ... any more complaints from charity fundraisers and option (A) applies.

(D) Frontier should do as they always should have done. Now is the time to make all systems, players, stations and ships immune to all forms of hostility in all circumstances. The charities will be saved, but only as part of a wider salvation. Heaven awaits!

(E) Perma-ban all PvP griefers.

(F) Perma-ban all UA bombers, zerg swarmers, goons, BGS attackers, authority-ship-killers, Powerplay 5th columnists, thread spammers, mod-pesterers and reddit brigaders.

(G) Ban everyone and everything except me, my Cobra III and DBOBE. (At last, we might meet...!)

.
.
.

Did I miss anything out?

Just one off the top of my head.

Every action has a counter. We should just chill out and play the game.
 
Back
Top Bottom