The Python is annoyingly good for its price. Its the answer for every question in the mid-game.

No no no. The python is fine. Doesnt need to be nerfed or buffed. Neither do any of the other ships in comparison to it. Nothing to see here FD, move along please.
 
Blaze your own trail. If you like the Python, fly it, otherwise don't.

Also, remember that other players will also be blazing their own trail. They may fly Pythons even if you don't.

In neither case is there any need to find the ship or its price annoying.
 
I changed the thread title to more accurately convey what I am trying to say.


Hopefully this will stop people from reacting to the title alone and actually read the OP like you are supposed to on a forum.
 
I tried VERY hard to use my Orca to do passenger missions the past few days, but constantly found myself unable to get max profits from stations because I didn't have space for that last mission that matched the others I just grabbed that went to the same system and to the same station within that system. So I thought "maybe I should try the AspX instead and just do long range missions" but thats not effective if your goal is JUST money.



So I came to the same inescapable conclusion that every single player that has ever played this game has come to at some point or another.



"Sure I could use *insert ship here*, but the Python is actually better."


The same can be applied to pretty much every situation with only a few exceptions when it comes to anyone that is in the mid-game and still earning ranks or credits and its driving me mad.


Shipping?


- Type-7? Takes a large pad and moves LESS CARGO than the Python DESPITE BEING A DEDICATED CARGO SHIP , and the Python can be used for alot more when its not shipping things.



- Type-6? Yeah it can jump farther, but the Python can move more for only a bit less jump range and can also excel in a combat role.



- Type-9? WAY out of the price range for anyone that is in the mid-game.


- Clipper? Python can carry more than the Clipper while still having the benefit of a medium landing pad. You also don't need to rank grind for the Python like you do for the Clipper.



Combat?


- Fer De Lance? Yes its a much better dedicated combat ship, but the Python can kick butt AND move a crapload of cargo at the same time while also having a much better jump range and fuel economy.


- Cobra? Yes its much cheaper, but both use the same size pad and the Python outperforms the Cobra in literally every single way except maneuverability which can be made up for by engineering.


- Clipper? Python has better damage. Though admittedly the Clipper can run circles around the Python in terms of actual performance. But like I said before the Clipper comes with the added negative of a rank grind. (Which admittedly has gotten easier, but still a grind nonetheless)


- Any of the Fed ships? Python has better versatility, none of the rank requirements, better jump range, and can carry ALOT more than any of them when outside of combat.


Passenger missions?


- Dolphin? Dolphin is faster, has better handling and jump range, but the Python can carry 3 times as many people, can take much more abuse, and can defend itself if poop hits the fan.


- Orca? Orca is much faster and handles much better, but the Python can carry more people, use a medium landing pad, take more abuse, and can be used in a role other than passenger missions. The Orca meanwhile is a pure passenger ship that can be used for other things but does none of them as well as other ships in the same price range.


- Beluga? Beluga can carry alot more people than the Python, but for the price range of the Beluga you might as well just save a bit more and get an Anaconda.




This is not a knock on the Python itself. Its a fantastic ship that is a godsend for players that don't have the money or ranks for any of the Big 3, but it is definitely a knock on all of the other ships. Because the Python is a "multipurpose" ship that does all of those purposes better than any of the DEDICATED ships of the same category.




(I am intentionally leaving out exploration because its not a job that I have done with regularity and don't wanna give opinions on something I know nothing about)




Its just frustrating to wanna to have certain questions, but have the same answer for every one of them. It takes all of the variety and meaning from the game for me.



I mean what is the purpose of picking a job or a role if you use the same fricking ship in every single one? Why even bother with any of the other ships outside the Big 3?



TL;DR: I have become a Python prostitute until I get my Anaconda and I don't like it.



EDIT: Let me be clear. By mid-game I am talking about players who are in between the lowers ships like Cobra, T-7, T-6, Clipper etc etc and the Big 3. They have more than enough for cheaper ships, but not enough for any of the Big 3.

Since "mid-game" is something that needs an "end-game" I would say your whole analysis is nothing that should be taken too serious, especially at this date :)

Welp :)

Honestly, the python is a nice ship, but the lack of jump range makes it ineffective for special purposes. For small/medium-pad-missions I found that the ASP is currently the best you can get. Trading with a python doesnt make any sense at all, massacre missions are obsolete since a couple of weeks and except a little pew pew the Python is nothing more than a good ship in the lineup.
 
I've long thought that we need a couple of decent competitors to the Python.

imho the T7 should have been made to fit on a medium pad, and arguably the Clipper as well (assuming it wasn't rank-locked) - these two ships would have given us something else to think about flying where we don't want to exclude ourselves from outposts.

As things currently stand, no other medium pad ships can compete with it in a multi-purpose or trading role. So it's not that the Python is too good, it's just that it has no competitors. Yet.
 
I've long thought that we need a couple of decent competitors to the Python.

imho the T7 should have been made to fit on a medium pad, and arguably the Clipper as well (assuming it wasn't rank-locked) - these two ships would have given us something else to think about flying where we don't want to exclude ourselves from outposts.

As things currently stand, no other medium pad ships can compete with it in a multi-purpose or trading role. So it's not that the Python is too good, it's just that it has no competitors. Yet.


Thank you!


Glad to see I am not alone in feeling this way lol
 
It's probably the only one that can do very profitable passenger runs from a small station.

I still only really use 2 ships, the asp for exploring and the python for everything else.
Did the, sidewinder,cobra,asp, python.
Tried the beluga liner but it couldn't land on smaller pads. In vr it was pretty big in the cockpit.

I might try the chieftain, looks like fun.
 
Last edited:
I've long thought that we need a couple of decent competitors to the Python.

imho the T7 should have been made to fit on a medium pad, and arguably the Clipper as well (assuming it wasn't rank-locked) - these two ships would have given us something else to think about flying where we don't want to exclude ourselves from outposts.

As things currently stand, no other medium pad ships can compete with it in a multi-purpose or trading role. So it's not that the Python is too good, it's just that it has no competitors. Yet.

This. It's not that the Python's annoyingly good, it's that it doesn't have any competition.

Making the t7 and the Clipper medium pad compatible would be a good start. I guess they can't easily change the size of the ship models, but maybe it's possible to change the size of a medium pad....?

OR they could just add some new ships!! ;) ... hmmm getting a strange sense of deja vu here...
 
The Python is annoyingly good for its price. Its the answer for every question in the mid-game.

I wasn't even aware there is a 'mid-game' in ED.

I use all kinds of ships for all kinds of things.
I use the Python if I want to do some ranking and/or missions without docking restrictions, but it is not my go to combat ship at all.
I have had combat fun in the Python, but I think the FDL is the true medium combat ship of choice in that price range.
 
People said the python would be useless after its nerf. People continue to claim the python is useless without engineering.
 
so, riddle me this....

I have a Cutter, had a Corvette, Annie, FAS, FGS and Clipper in the past. Tried the Chief, I had an FdL for years (my favourite ship). So why do I spend most of my time in a Python? Maybe I should try a T10.....
 
I agree with the thoughts on the T7 and Clipper - also feel that the Keelback isn't quite meeting it's potential.
Not sure on the whole mid \end game thing - in elite you have a period of not having enough money\materials to do what you want and then those things become trivial to a great extent and it becomes do what you want.
Currently I have an IEagle, Python and a Fed corvette. Of those the Python and IEagle are my go to ships and the ones that I put time into engineering etc - the Corvette is really only engineered up the wazoo because it inherited all the stuff from the Anaconda and it was pretty easy to do. As long as it doesn't cost me to have it I will, if there was anything else that interested me it would go in a heartbeat.
Looking forward to the Krait.
 
People said the python would be useless after its nerf. People continue to claim the python is useless without engineering.

If it's pvp all ships need engineering or your fodder - pve anything will work. Python, Cobra 3, Viper, IEagle seem to me at least to get the "most" out of engineering - it really, really makes them shine - possibly Clipper as well, but I've never (and probably never will) own one to try.
 
Counterpoint- Salvage.

The Python does not make a good salvage ship as far as space salvage is concerned. If you've tried scooping with the Python it's unique in that the cargo bay is BEHIND the cockpit meaning it's the ultimate trick to actually scoop anything with a Python.

Yes the Python is god of the Gunship class vessels. Hence it's extremely high price. It is the most expensive ship in the Medium landing pad class.

For those who work on the fringe systems where there's very few stations and many more outposts, the Python is about where the cutoff is. If you're more working in the core of the Bubble then you're going to want a bigger ship to haul bigger loads.

As noted by it's name. The Python is a DeLacy model and is considered an Anaconda-lite. And considering how many others talk about how OP the Anaconda is, it only makes sense it's little brother is the god tier of the class below it. They should probably just nerf DeLacy then their products. :D

Though I question your use of 'mid-game' since there is no such thing. One can easily skip the Gunship class and go straight from Fighter to Frigate if they so wanted. Yes the Python is good at everything but in truth, trying to make it so means it will suffer compared to other ships. I had a general purpose Python when I was running a trade CG. The T7 was able to haul much more cargo then I was because I had other modules attached to make me a more versatile ship.

That's the python's strong suit. It's a highly module ship. If you make it so it's a dedicated anything, sure it will match or exceed said dedicated ships. But if you try to do everything at the same time like I do, then it's going to be weakened in that area.

I was nether able to haul as much Cargo as the T7 nor was I as nimble and combat capable as the Viper I was winged up with. However since I was outfitted for both, I was able to be heavy support guarding the T7 bodyguard style by taking the hits while the Viper went killing while making up for the Viper's shortfall in amount of cargo it could carry. I was good at both but excelled at nether.

Sure your claims are valid but it seems to me that you outfitted your Python and changed up it's role before you attempted each job. Of course it's going to be superior.

Try outfitting your Python to do everything at the same time and see how god tier it is then.
 
Back
Top Bottom