Jason, jason, jason....
How about you stop telling people how to play the game, and start playing the game you want, without the need of others? If you can't enjoy Elite in Solo play, Elite isn't the game for you... how about that?
Modes To Corvette in narri that merced me and my buddy for literally no reason then killing us as we fled
- Thread starter Wesley_pipes_man
- Start date
Jason, jason, jason....
How about you stop telling people how to play the game, and start playing the game you want, without the need of others? If you can't enjoy Elite in Solo play, Elite isn't the game for you... how about that?
LOL. Hilarious.
I would have hoped getting interdicted by a CMDR would be more fun. But it isn't. Being interdicted by a CMDR is more boring than being interdicted by an NPC. At least the NPC regurgitates some pre-programmed lines that at least try to be on topic. A CMDR goes pew pew pew, and that's it.
Bob Lighthouse
Banned
What?
That sounds like another lie to me.
"No reason at all" isn't open to such interpretation.
Lol, that was more to stop the farming of NPCs, ie PVE griefing.
They outright said so.
Toxic is lying about the rules and the people who are playing the game as intended.
You might even say it's "common sense" that in a spaceship game where every ship comes with weapons, that you're expected to shoot at each other.
Typical spiel to be expected from griefers and griefer appologists :rolleye:...
Regardless of the OP's case, PvP is subject to reasonable behavioural restrictions - those restrictions are not spelled out explicitly in the EULA or ToS but common sense should tell any given individual whether they have crossed the line in terms of their actions. Those that do cross the line either have no common sense OR do not care - given the attitudes of some in these forums I am inclined think it may also be a mix of the two.
As for lying about the rules, far from it.
Lol.
Reasonable restrictions that no one really knows and aren’t apparently enforced in any way.
You people pick some weird hills to die on.
Reasonable restrictions that no one really knows and aren’t apparently enforced in any way.
You people pick some weird hills to die on.
This thread has turned into nothing but name shaming and well alot of stupid talk. This had to do with me killing a player since he was a pp faction i was a enemy with. So enough of this nonsense talk and op please close this thread as it just keeps going on and on with nothing to do with the very first post.
Everyone should know what reasonable restrictions mean in the context of PvP behaviours in this kind of game, it is just common courtesy and common sense in a game like ED.
It is not something that any civilised person should need explaining to them.
OOF Waffe PR
Banned
Doesn't apply in a video game.
You mean those mythical rules that don't exist except in players heads & they are all different?
And they all depend on what side of the bed the player got out of, if they've had their morning coffee/beer, been to work etc...
Last edited:
The rules are far from mythical nor do they essentially change in accordance with the mood of any given player.
I point at my earlier post wrt their fundamental nature. However, fundamentally while the rules are not easily parameterised or defined they are far from being fluid in terms of intent.
OOF Waffe PR
Banned
It doesn't really mean anything, you just leave it to interpretation based on common sense.
Common sense is a relative term, whatever makes sense to you might not make sense to me and vice versa.
The TOS is very clear on whats allowed or not when it comes to open play.
Bob Lighthouse
Banned
Where?
Bob Lighthouse
Banned
Bob Lighthouse
Banned
Bob Lighthouse
Banned
The "othering" above is the typical response of someone who has nothing else to stand on, aside from thinly veiled ad hominems and poisoning of the well.
Don't be fooled people!
Nothing in that message actually counters what I have been saying.
The EULA counts as part of the "rules of the game" and there are prohibitions on behaviours which could constitute harassment - Griefing falls into that category, and habitual ganking could too (precise circumstances and context are everything).
Ultimately though, point 1 emphasises one of the other points I have made in this and similar threads (the merits of any given complaint are down to the relevant complaint assessment body to judge) and point 3 is a case of FD effectively deferring a lot of the responsibility for policing of behaviours to Microsoft for the Xbox platform (to at-least some degree).
Further more, it does not explicitly say PvP is unconstrained either - point 5 is not a license to engage in harassment of players using PvP.
Bob Lighthouse
Banned
^
This is called obfuscation people.
"No reason at all" is very clear.
"Rule violations" must be also explicit.
The above handwavium and logical fallacies change none of that.