Thank whoever raised me that i am not as pretentious as you. You spout all over the topic and spam it with 5+ replies every time. Give it a break, let the adults who come with coherent discussions talk.
The Size Issue, and others
- Thread starter joe49115
- Start date
Thank whoever raised me that i am not as pretentious as you. You spout all over the topic and spam it with 5+ replies every time. Give it a break, let the adults who come with coherent discussions talk.
Seriously - YOU NEED TO STOP IT - with the claiming people don't know what they are talking about . YOU have no idea of other people's actual dinosaur knowledge, or their experiences with dinosaur skeletons. You certainly don't in my case.
If you had read some my past posts - I have said repeatedly that T.rex should be about at least 1 metric ton heavier than Giganotosaurus - in spite of the Giganotosaurus being very slightly longer. In addition the JP/JW T.rexes tend to be a bit slimmer than normal T.rexes.
Second - you do understand that most of the discussion on this topic is related to the sizes of the dinosaurs in the JWE Game -Right? Which is not always based on real world science.
Case - in point - in JP the T.rex (Rexy) was stated to have been clocked at 51.5 kph/32 mph by John Hammond, and the Velociraptors were stated to be capable of 80-96 kph/50-60 mph by Robert Moldoon. Which means that they are officially part of JP/JW lore. But in real world science neither of these species were capable of anything close to these figures as adults.
Last edited:
Before this spirals out of control, may I remind everyone to stay on topic and adhere to the forum rules especially point 2.
Refrain from name calling and respond to the posts not the poster.
If that's somehow difficult for you, you can always simply add a person to your ignore list and you won't see any posts from that person.
Refrain from name calling and respond to the posts not the poster.
If that's somehow difficult for you, you can always simply add a person to your ignore list and you won't see any posts from that person.
Last edited:
Didnt know about the ignore feature so thanks. He's been happily added there.
Giganotosaurus should be larger but thinner. Like Dinoken said.
Really guys, can we get to the point without fighting? I do not think anyone disputes that Giganotosaurus should be at least as tall and as long as the T-Rex in the game. And Spinosaurus too.
I assume that the T-Rex is not going to touch it up so I am satisfied that Spino and Giga can be at their level of height and length. It is not an opinion, it is a massive request. Giganotosaurus in height is a DWARF.
Another issue they must fix is the Allosaurus stats. I'm surprised that nobody else has reported it. Allosaurus wins all non-hybrid dinosaurs in combat. Try it if you want without modifications and with 100% of genome and you will see what happens. It needs to be nerfeado. I do not know what Frontier was thinking about when he gave him 107 attacks and 33 defense.
I assume that the T-Rex is not going to touch it up so I am satisfied that Spino and Giga can be at their level of height and length. It is not an opinion, it is a massive request. Giganotosaurus in height is a DWARF.
Another issue they must fix is the Allosaurus stats. I'm surprised that nobody else has reported it. Allosaurus wins all non-hybrid dinosaurs in combat. Try it if you want without modifications and with 100% of genome and you will see what happens. It needs to be nerfeado. I do not know what Frontier was thinking about when he gave him 107 attacks and 33 defense.
Last edited:
Yeah I think it having 9 gene slots is also an issue, IMHO all the dinos need 9 slots and they need to adjust 5 of the slots the amount of research centres you have so... at 100% and all islands unlocked with research centres you’d have 9 slots with 1 cosmetic slot because a lot of dinos are ridiculously weak and others are ridiculously over powered and I think allowing all dinos to have 9 slots would bring them all in line.
It is not only the slots to modify, it is that some pure dinosaurs are ridiculously strong and others ridiculously weak.
Allosaurus and Triceratops are the maximum exponents. One because it wins even T-Rex and the other because it loses with all the big carnivores when Triceratops should be Top 10 of strongest dinosaurs.
For example I would like 100% of the pure genome Triceratops could only lose to I-Rex, T-Rex, Giga and Spino. It is too big, too heavy and too well armed for smaller and lighter carnivores to defeat him in combat.
Maybe it is asking too much "realism" for a game of JP / JW but that the armed herbivores in this game are harmless to carnivores. They should have better stats. And Allosaurus like 10 points less in attack, is broken.
Last edited:
why make allosaurus weaker ?
just make t-rex and co. stronger than him. + you certainly get the idea that triceratops is weaker than it's relatives because he is the first one unlocked. Thats the idea of making Some kind of a progression system in the game, by making the others stronger the devs certainly though that we would appreciate more to unlock them. Same goes for the allosaurus i guess.
Well, we can agree that it was a mistake. I vote for a stronger triceratops, she was not my favorite as a kid, but i still like her.
just make t-rex and co. stronger than him. + you certainly get the idea that triceratops is weaker than it's relatives because he is the first one unlocked. Thats the idea of making Some kind of a progression system in the game, by making the others stronger the devs certainly though that we would appreciate more to unlock them. Same goes for the allosaurus i guess.
Well, we can agree that it was a mistake. I vote for a stronger triceratops, she was not my favorite as a kid, but i still like her.
But you see with my idea you could still progress and make even better dinos that you already have and therefore you have even more progression, by unlocking a new slot per research station per island they could even make it a research that you have to unlock and thus make it a money sink, as I’m sure we are all in agreement that making money in this game is way too easy.
This way it would also play into other frequently requested things such as sandbox with money and everything relocked, then you would have to research the five different gene techs to unlock more slots for all dinos, this would tie in with increased life spans etc etc you name it all dinos having 9 gene slots would solve so many issues...
Atm they expect us to believe that 100% triceratops DNA only requires splicing 4 extra component when Tyrannosaurus requires 8 and Allosaurus requires 9... it doesn’t really make sense and I’m probably asking too much for a core mechanic to be altered but I genuinely think it would be a better overall mechanic if done that way
Also T-Rex having an extra slot be it defensive, offensive, resistance or lifespan with the correct gene would make it stronger than Allosaurus, without buffing or nerfing either/or.
Last edited:
Yep money is too easy at a point of a game i never look at it again. So, what could make me look at it again, and improve my gaming experience, your idea is really good, because, yeah, unlock every slot for each dinosaure would be awesome, so to be able to unlock all of them, we would need 100% genome and then we can start to unlock them one by one, and that stuff could be very expensive.
I got my own idea based on yours now,
So to make just one specie of dinosaur that is 100% optimised with all 9 slots, we would need like (for exemple) 90 millions, with this feature, we would not be able to upgrade all of our dinosaurs species, or it would be a long way to go. We first should choose one dinosaur to start, make a great enclosure, and do it again for another, while making some normal 100% dinosaurs. And sometimes hatch a super dinosaur when money allows it. I would love it.
To me it would be perfect. I would make a great enclosure, watch my optimised dino eat etc,
I ike infinite money when i want to make beautiful stuff easily, but, this idea i really like it.
Kind of makes me wonder wether that was a stipulation of Universal... maybe they want to turn the juvenile from FK into the main antagonist of JW3.
Well they don't have many dinosaurs to pick from anymore..
For everyone fighting over the Giga Being bigger than the Rex..it's an unsubstantiated claim. The claim is that the Giga is bigger than a Rex because the femur they found is 2 inches bigger than that if the Rex. The thing is the Giga is a Carnosaur. Their femurs we're characterized as being longer than their shins were. If this is correct, which more scientists are starting to say, then the Giga wouldn't be as tall as a Rex. It would be longer because of its skull and tail, but it's height would be significantly smaller. As for the Spino, it was heavily modified almost to the point of being a hybrid. Those modifications are What makes it look like it does. If we go historically then the Spino looks nothing like it did irl. It's spine is completely different
Well - as has been "stated and debated" many times of this topic - it all depends by what is meant by "bigger". Do they mean longer, taller or more massive.
Giganotosaurus may be very slightly longer, but T.rex is slightly taller and about metric 1 ton heavier that roughly the same size.
Giganotosaurus may be very slightly longer, but T.rex is slightly taller and about metric 1 ton heavier that roughly the same size.
Yes, it does not seem bad to me. T-Rex must be heavier for its muscular build and slightly taller but shorter than Giga.
This has nothing to do with the Giga we see in the game that suffers from dwarfism to have a ridiculous height.
If T-Rex measures 5 exaggerated meters of height Giga must measure 4'5 and 14 of minimum length ... Because T-Rex in the game measures exaggerated 14 meters.
Giganotosaurus was longer and at least as tall as Rex while being much less bulky. This is a fact. The Giganotosaurus in JWE is SMALLER THAN THE FRICKING ALLOSAURUS. Why are you so against this being fixed?
Giganotosaurus may be slightly longer about (10 cm), but the hip height is actually less(about 20 cm) than T.rex's
I know a lot of people cite the 13.2 meter long specimen of Giganotosaurus - but that is just based on a single bone. However there are some equally fragmentary specimens of T.rex which suggest a length of about 10% larger than "Sue" - or about 13.5 meters. So it all depends on which figures you use. It is safe to say that T.rex and Giganotosaurus were roughly the same length. With T.rex being slightly taller and heavier. overall .
I know a lot of people cite the 13.2 meter long specimen of Giganotosaurus - but that is just based on a single bone. However there are some equally fragmentary specimens of T.rex which suggest a length of about 10% larger than "Sue" - or about 13.5 meters. So it all depends on which figures you use. It is safe to say that T.rex and Giganotosaurus were roughly the same length. With T.rex being slightly taller and heavier. overall .
Last edited:
It does not matter how much we disagree about the centimeters. What matters is that Giga must be urgently enlarged to a much greater height. Only I-Rex, T-Rex and Spino should be at his height or above him.
Then we can disagree on the exact length and height but the main thing is that Giga must give a good squeeze to put where it should be that is in the same league of the colossal theropods.
Then we can disagree on the exact length and height but the main thing is that Giga must give a good squeeze to put where it should be that is in the same league of the colossal theropods.