I don't have a strong opinion. Just curious what others think. The recent SC demos have been pretty strong and i've observed Obsidianant for eg recently focussing on that and X4 instead of ED. Is ED getting stale i wonder? It's had a good run but maybe we're on the cusp of contenders for the crown taking it's place? Or will the unknown 'big' update we've been told to expect reassert it's dominance?? Personally i hope so. I hope it can fulfil it's planned 10 year life anyway.
I wish people would stop mucking about with this idea of 'THE space game'. Apart from SC, there are tons of promising games on the horizons, and cool games already released. ED is one of them. ED does some things spectacularly well, miles beyond anything any competitor offers. Other space games do completely different things.
You enjoy flying spaceships and tinkering with them? You like planetary landings? VR? HOTAS? A huge galaxy, free to roam? Multiplayer? ED is your game! You like walking around on strange alien planets, observing all kinds of alien flora and fauna? NMS got you covered! Want to manage a large space conglomerate, managing fleets and factories? Take a look at X4!
None of the games offer 'everything', none intend to, none ever will. Only one game 'pretends' to do so, and it has been a hilarious clusterfarce likely to go down the history books as the worst development in modern gaming history. So lets stop with that nonsense, and accept that 'space game' is a super broad concept, with tons of space (sorry) for many diverse games. Buy one, buy some, buy them all: above all have fun.
Come on, ya cant throw something like that with out deeper explanation.
Space plays a relatively small role in it, its more 'backdrop' to a large management game than a 'space game'. I'd still call it a space game myself, just a completely different kind than ED. Or NMS. Or Space Engineers. Or KSP.
