HE hasnt thought this through?? Lol.
Do you seriously think they will be ?.
HE hasnt thought this through?? Lol.
Read the thread.
Do you seriously think they will be ?.
I've read the thread and still don't see what the consequential loss is - if someone leaves an engagement, feel free to highlight it to me though...
This is an entire different topic. Stop trying to derail the discussion. Thats a very nasty habbit you got there.
That's twice you've gone offtopic and got all sniffy about me replying to your post. I'm going to give you a tip, if offtopic stuff hurts your feelings don't go offtopic.
Whatever you do don't go offtopic then get all pretend moderator at the replies being offtopic, its funny but it just doesn't work.
What the heck? Of course that is 'fair and right'. In Open everyone can be attacked by everyone else, that is the very concept of Open.
This is an entire different topic. Stop trying to derail the discussion. Thats a very nasty habbit you got there.
If i have gone off topic then i apologize. But your habit still stands, you do it in so many threads. I have seen where this is leading with your posts.
If the OP or a mod thinks i have derailed the thread with off topic posts then i ll stop talking right here.
You obviously haven't thought this through, people who don't like the very idea of open are very unlikely to be in open in the first place.
Except that nobody is suggesting that the consequence should be shifted onto the other player (that the remaining player's ship should get blown up instead). An end to the combat mitigates the consequences for both participants.
Of course, there's another "fair" alternative: as nobody knows who would have won if RL had not intervened, auto-destruct both participants. I imagine this would be controversial.
What exactly do you want to know about the subject he raised? Ask spesifics, and i ll surprise you with my answer and you will see that i know those stuff way better than you.Just 'cos somebody makes a point that you haven't thought about, it doesn't mean it's off-topic.
In my last post yes i was replying to you since you made it personal. Whats the problem?Ah, so you are replying to the poster not the post. Glad we cleared that up.
Or they are in Open, reserve the right to cheat and demand the game is changed at its core to suit their wishes.
What exactly do you want to know about the subject he raised? Ask spesifics, and i ll surprise you with my answer and you will see that i know those stuff way better than you.
Awhatnow?
Menu logging is "cheating"?
And who's asking for the game to be "changed at its core to suit their wishes"?
Seems like the only people doing that around here are people moaning about menu-logging and demanding players get punished for doing it.
That already happened a few pages back and your response was to say you were only interested in PvP and nothing else.
Or they are in Open, reserve the right to cheat and demand the game is changed at its core to suit their wishes.
You posted only to take his side?
Says the guy who responded to one of my post to somebody else just to say "HE hasnt thought this through?? Lol." without actually bothering to address any of the actual points I raised in that post.
As Stigbob already noted, you seem to have a habit of acting in various ways and then bleating when anybody acts in a way that you don't approve of.
Whatev's.
The point of my post was simply to remind people that a post isn't necessarily off-topic just because it raises a point you haven't thought of, or care about.
Cat Fight!