Uranus?
Please... no probe references here!!!!
Uranus?
It is a bit of oxymoron the way you put it. Otherwise, they absolutely have dedicated servers supporting their p2p infrastructure and they are even adding a new one specifically for missions in 3.3.dedicated servers that support the p2p system more efficiently?
So if everyone who only wants to play in PG Solo go to X4 can we make ED Open only?I'd pay a subscription
So if everyone who only wants to play in PG Solo go to X4 can we make ED Open only?I'd pay a subscription
I think it's a general thought that when we hang out with your friends it takes too long to see each other. Hence my question, why not invest in dedicated servers that support the p2p system more efficiently?
In the last pre-launch trailer they showed us ships flying together, making us believe that we are going to be able to fly. Is there a real solution or is it just another little lie by Frontier?
So Elite Dangerous is a multiplayer game or a single player?
and the physical speed-of-light limits on inter-continental instancing.
I'm pretty sure the "Solo players are taking over the BGS" conspiracy theory is a myth, with the possible exception of bots. Now the "PS4 players are taking over the BGS" theory has some merit, since we have at least one platform-specific player faction that you can't touch via traditional PvP means on your PC or XBox![]()
I think people misunderstand how central p2p is to how ED works. It isn't as if they can make the decision tomorrow to throw some money at it, flick a switch and suddenly it is all client/server. In the end it is about what kind of game ED is. And that is a game where youu play by yourself or with a small group of friends, and occassionally encounter others. It isn't about massive pvp battles or some such, and making that happen would be a massive investment of time and resources. In the end I feel by far most players would much rather see atmo planets, space legs and more gameplay options rather than FD focusing on massive multiplayer infrastructure changes. Especially if the latter would result in subscriptions, which they promised they'd never do. So 10-15 people max is going to be a practical limit I guess.
So why don't they use supercruise?
Its a single player game with a multiplayer plugin.
^ I'm afraid this is spot on. I would love to see 50-100 player battles - full on wars. Unfortunately, this will never be the game for that.
To be fair, no game can do that. Even EVE, which is known for enormous battles, only manages by slowing down time to let the servers catch up with all the activity.
I'm pretty sure the "Solo players are taking over the BGS" conspiracy theory is a myth, with the possible exception of bots. Now the "PS4 players are taking over the BGS" theory has some merit, since we have at least one platform-specific player faction that you can't touch via traditional PvP means on your PC or XBox![]()
Brilliant, Old duck! +1
(screams for cross-platform integration!)
Yep, this.
And where will that money come from?
Clue: it begins with a "U" and ends in an "s".
So Elite Dangerous is a multiplayer game or a single player?
To be fair, no game can do that. Even EVE, which is known for enormous battles, only manages by slowing down time to let the servers catch up with all the activity.