Well isn't this a cosy little thread.
It seem to me, that despite evidence from various sources, and multiple posters sharing the same information, that there just HAS to be a small subset of people who decide to make a specific topic their 'defense of choice'.
I mean, let's go back to the beta discussion regarding the FSS. I am one of those who defended that particular feature, because in MY opinion, it did not break the game, it added depth and flavour to a previously tasteless part of the game, and has been proven over and over again to be just as fast as the old DSS, but with extra goodness for those who are willing to put a little bit of extra time in.
However, there were a small minority who disagreed, saying it made things longer, ruined their specific playstyle and other such criticisms. And while there were one or two who seemed to just be adding their tuppence-worth in for no real reason, most arguments were fairly clear and understandable. So this was a pretty good discussion.
THIS topic however, defies all rational explaination. I'm seeing ridiculous phrases such as 'colour space' and 'calibration', which is utter nonsense. The only arguments in defence of thi new system is that 'it's fine for me', and 'I don't see anything wrong'. These are not actually arguments - these are personal observations which, at the end of the day, have NO IMPACT on anyone else. If you are happy with things, why not just move along, there's really nothing to see here. Why continue to try and argue with people who clearly DO have issues with the new system, and are simply asking for a way to TURN IT OFF - this has NO impact on anyone else who chooses to view the galaxy in whatever hue the nearest star is throwing out.
Arguing about a feature that fundamentally changes the game is a good discussion.
Arguing about a cosmetic feature that could just be a toggle - and does not affect anyone elses gameplay - is just a waste of energy.