I'm new around forums, used the quote more as a form of a personal mention than actual quote. I'm sorry for misunderstanding.That is not my original reply. This is what I wrote:
I'm new around forums, used the quote more as a form of a personal mention than actual quote. I'm sorry for misunderstanding.That is not my original reply. This is what I wrote:
Don't You mean "FSS", Sir?But your idea of just selling the old FSD
What long standing game elements are you talking about? The FSD was a (way too) long standing placeholder if not even the opposite, a non existing game element. And it's high time all these empty holes being filled by now with true content and not leaving behind such nonsense like the FSD. Though not without some pain, I could accept an Exclusive Or solution as in Ziljan's original proposal. But your idea of just selling the old FSD without any form of repercussion is ridiculous. Not sure why the new forum seem to inspire you to a new attempt, what's so different now? More noobs perhaps in the hope for some easy pushovers?
But then there's still the argument of extra maintenance costs, why I strongly doubt your campaign will ever be crowned with success.
Waste of dev time.
- feedback.
It's only an hour's work. Don't sweat it.
Since when is expanding the game The Developer's waste of time?Waste of dev time.
My fave is turn the rings onOh dear, what a misrepresentation. There a are a plethora of resources showing you how to interpret the "icons" you dismiss. Once you got to know the rough "goldilocks zone" of star types you could even venture whether there were terraformable bodies.
Since when is expanding the game The Developer's waste of time?
This thread is about feedback and possible solutions to those aspects of the updates some consider negative changes.
Developers themselves asked for feedback.
No worries.I'm new around forums, used the quote more as a form of a personal mention than actual quote. I'm sorry for misunderstanding.
While it's still your campaign. I know your history and efforts on that matter, noobs most likely will not.
That's why I talked to you in the first place, not to the OP.
I would by no means like the devs to "move backwards".Moving backwards isn't expanding.
I would by no means like the devs to "move backwards".
Since many times over this thread I claimed that I do not wish anything be removed from the game as is.
I'd much rather focus on the possibility of reintroducing what's been removed. Sure enough, many have expressed their disapproval of old exploration mechanics.
I do not see any harm in reintroducing aspects of the game that have already been implemented. Both parties are satisfied this way. Nothing is taken from anybody.
As Para Handy mentioned, people did stand for ADS to remain in the game. But the Developers didn't listen. For whatever reason, i don't judge.
I would like all of You to focus on that rather than taking this request and proposed solutions as an attack on FSS.
ADS could be an extention to the FSS. For those willing to do so. Experimental effect? Module? Through engineering? You name it. If (re)introduced as optional method i can't really notice any downsides. As mentioned further above, it would not look like much work either(at least appears to not be). We are talking about reintroducing things, already within the game. As optional method of carrying out exploration. Let everyone find their playstyle. I do not want to attack neither Developers nor those strongly praising FSS over ADS. Just asking You to notice the positive effects it may have on those more inclined towards the ADS and to the game overall.
..........
This still doesnt explain why the endless nay saying. If people had just got on with it and held a truely neutral attitude to all this, then why do they keep posting?
Agreed. And so They did.I think players should adapt to the game.
Yet I can't get rid of feeling of being constantly accused of being one of the whiners. ........
Never will happen. There was huge complaints that jump honk fly was a placeholder and we wanted more advanced exploration tools. Analysis mode is a great tool for anything and why wa;lk back a simple thing when it can be more granular?
One could ask why people who have abandoned Elite keep on posting in the forum.
You will recall that my previous posts to you (in the previous forum) were basically calling you out for the continuous restating of your complaint, HUNDREDS of posts and in every thread you could crowbar them into.
Agreed here. FSS is a somewhat fun mechanic to be introduced after rather shallow get-close-to-scan alternative.people who refuse to engage with it really are just hurting themselves.