Well the expectations after weeks of discussions and announcements were high and at least in my case were disappointed.
Why? First of all lets talk about the concept of a computer. Its a machine who gets information, does work on it and gives information back - input, processing, output. Some computers may have an interface to physical machines. Those computers may not only give information back but may control other physical systems, like engines, steering, etc. The limitations of such a computer are ONLY in its software and its interface.
Well, what we got here: We got a Computer which has an interface to the engines of the ship, its steering and its navigations controls. Also it does receive information from the navigation system including its location, speed and heading. So we got EVERYTHING in this Computer Module to operate as a full scale autopilot, which can launch and land automaticly.
But what would it take to give this Module the skill to steer the ship to a destination of the skippers choice? Well, just a lil Software Update. Nothing more.
Then the Computer would launch from the station/base, head to the next navigation point, goes into supercruise, heads for the destination and would do every standard manouver actually the skipper still has to do manually, although its everytime the exact same annoying procedure.
Well, but what did we get? A Computer who can only land and launch and which capabilities are not even used. And we did get a supercruise assist, which does almost nothing i couldnt achieve without it except the auto-brake after jumping into a system which is pretty useless to 99% of all pilots. The "supercruise assist" is a complete waste of slot, power and money. The whole "capabilities" of the supercruise assist should be another function in the advanced computer module we purchased earlier. Also this "assist" may learn how to navigate after entering a system, to jump to the next navigation point (jump to the next system cruise to it) instead of just auto stopping.
Sure, everything a autopilot could do is something a real pilot could do himself. Any some would argue that its the actual fun to do it yourself. You know what?! Keep it that way. If you dont like it, just dont buy an autopilot, but on the other hand dont tell us we shouldnt get one. Nobody forces you to buy and use one. And you - please - dont force us to do everything manually. There are good reasons to have a full scale autopilot and there are good reasons not to use one. The decision should lay in the hands of the pilot himself, NOT in yours or mine. But there should be the possibility to make a choice!
For me for example its f++ing annoing to spend 1-2 hours of my life span to do nothing but jump to the next system by hand, heading to the next system, jump again, heading to the next system, jump again, and so on. Yeah, there are ppl enjoying the fun of feeping the wip on the naked back, but i dont like it either. In those situations, if i got lots of systems jump to do to get to my destination, i wish i had an autopilot.
Autopilots are for pilots who hate annoying repeating simple boring tasks.
Thats why i think the both modules are not good enough.
make the supercruise assist disappear and put it into the advanced computer.
Make it a full scale autopilot and make it possible to assign a key to its function just to switch it on and off. No fiddling menu airobics.
Such a module would be worth giving it a slot and its worth would make it of course more expensive. let it cost 2-3million and consume 1mW of power or less. But pilots like me would use their life time in a more effectiv and productive way while traveliing and not only the "autopilot" made of flesh and bones, if a computer subroutinge could do the very same job and we could read something on galnet, or in the database or drinking some coffee for gods sake.
But stop giving us for EVERY single computer subroutine a "new module" which wasting slots, money and power.
my point of view.
Why? First of all lets talk about the concept of a computer. Its a machine who gets information, does work on it and gives information back - input, processing, output. Some computers may have an interface to physical machines. Those computers may not only give information back but may control other physical systems, like engines, steering, etc. The limitations of such a computer are ONLY in its software and its interface.
Well, what we got here: We got a Computer which has an interface to the engines of the ship, its steering and its navigations controls. Also it does receive information from the navigation system including its location, speed and heading. So we got EVERYTHING in this Computer Module to operate as a full scale autopilot, which can launch and land automaticly.
But what would it take to give this Module the skill to steer the ship to a destination of the skippers choice? Well, just a lil Software Update. Nothing more.
Then the Computer would launch from the station/base, head to the next navigation point, goes into supercruise, heads for the destination and would do every standard manouver actually the skipper still has to do manually, although its everytime the exact same annoying procedure.
Well, but what did we get? A Computer who can only land and launch and which capabilities are not even used. And we did get a supercruise assist, which does almost nothing i couldnt achieve without it except the auto-brake after jumping into a system which is pretty useless to 99% of all pilots. The "supercruise assist" is a complete waste of slot, power and money. The whole "capabilities" of the supercruise assist should be another function in the advanced computer module we purchased earlier. Also this "assist" may learn how to navigate after entering a system, to jump to the next navigation point (jump to the next system cruise to it) instead of just auto stopping.
Sure, everything a autopilot could do is something a real pilot could do himself. Any some would argue that its the actual fun to do it yourself. You know what?! Keep it that way. If you dont like it, just dont buy an autopilot, but on the other hand dont tell us we shouldnt get one. Nobody forces you to buy and use one. And you - please - dont force us to do everything manually. There are good reasons to have a full scale autopilot and there are good reasons not to use one. The decision should lay in the hands of the pilot himself, NOT in yours or mine. But there should be the possibility to make a choice!
For me for example its f++ing annoing to spend 1-2 hours of my life span to do nothing but jump to the next system by hand, heading to the next system, jump again, heading to the next system, jump again, and so on. Yeah, there are ppl enjoying the fun of feeping the wip on the naked back, but i dont like it either. In those situations, if i got lots of systems jump to do to get to my destination, i wish i had an autopilot.
Autopilots are for pilots who hate annoying repeating simple boring tasks.
Thats why i think the both modules are not good enough.
make the supercruise assist disappear and put it into the advanced computer.
Make it a full scale autopilot and make it possible to assign a key to its function just to switch it on and off. No fiddling menu airobics.
Such a module would be worth giving it a slot and its worth would make it of course more expensive. let it cost 2-3million and consume 1mW of power or less. But pilots like me would use their life time in a more effectiv and productive way while traveliing and not only the "autopilot" made of flesh and bones, if a computer subroutinge could do the very same job and we could read something on galnet, or in the database or drinking some coffee for gods sake.
But stop giving us for EVERY single computer subroutine a "new module" which wasting slots, money and power.
my point of view.
Last edited: