What server?Kill his connection to the server ?
What server?Kill his connection to the server ?
Matchmaking / Adjudication? Both?What server?
Give one person the key to ban any user on that architecture?Matchmaking / Adjudication? Both?
When you start ED your user ID is sent to the servers (where your save game resides?) and a connection is made - I assume that it would be particularly easy for Frontier to send a command to disconnect any user ID to whichever server handles user connection. Think of the times when recent patches were released and we were disconnected due to either matchmaking or adjucation servers being 'unavailable', then apply the same principle to an individual/wave of account(s)Give one person the key to ban any user on that architecture?
It may be possible, but wouldn't that be a lot of responsibility for 1 person? For that scope of responsibilities a system of checks would be advisable. And usually that takes a bit longer than having admins meting out rulings on dedicated servers.When you start ED your user ID is sent to the servers (where your save game resides?) and a connection is made - I assume that it would be particularly easy for Frontier to send a command to disconnect any user ID to whichever server handles user connection. Think of the times when recent patches were released and we were disconnected due to either matchmaking or adjucation servers being 'unavailable', then apply the same principle to an individual/wave of account(s)![]()
At least the account could be restored equally quickly - I assume we are discussing a proven 'cheat' in this manner, rather than just a player who has a name an admin doesn't like, or who may have jogged his arm in the pub causing him to spill his beerIt may be possible, but wouldn't that be a lot of responsibility for 1 person? For that scope of responsibilities a system of checks would be advisable. And usually that takes a bit longer than having admins meting out rulings on dedicated servers.
Do you cheat in solo?What's the point in streaming a cheater griefing everyone else, supposedly making a point? Aren't you providing said cheater with the conduit they are seeking? Is that the agreed upon outcome?
Every day folks remind me why I play in Solo.
Up to Frontier whether they'd think this is something they'd want to put the time and effort into setting up and monitoring, but it would surely put off a lot of people if they knew they'd have to change mobile phone details to get round a ban.Some games require two factor authentication on mobile phone.
Not sure where you are going with that. I play in Solo to avoid the agendas of other people and only experience game based agendas.Do you cheat in solo?
suuuureNot sure where you are going with that. I play in Solo to avoid the agendas of other people and only experience game based agendas.
Funny how they permaban him immediately but anything else it's "Rest assured we are working on it and take things seriously"i saw this somewhere:
![]()
actually, dunno how he feels about the ban, of course it was to be expected.
frontier just banning him and saying nohing else is exactly the last thing they should have done in this specific situation. and it somehow surprises nobody.
oh well, let's grab more popcorn.
Well, what would you do in their position, when someone effectively yells "Look at me! I'm cheating!", would you just shrug and thank him for pointing out that the cheat exists, then tell him to keep on playing?Funny how they permaban him immediately but anything else it's "Rest assured we are working on it and take things seriously"
Would be nice to get a nice ban list with CMDR names every month. That way we can see who has been cheating and who was banned.Well, what would you do in their position, when someone effectively yells "Look at me! I'm cheating!", would you just shrug and thank him for pointing out that the cheat exists, then tell him to keep on playing?
Oddy enough, I agree with you, but "Political Correctness" is the order of the day and all we can ever expect is "something has been done", a very dry bone rather than a juicy, meaty oneWould be nice to get a nice ban list with CMDR names every month. That way we can see who has been cheating and who was banned.
Wishful thinking due to their "naming and shaming" policy though![]()
Sadly a dog who has been eating meat it's whole life tends to react poorly and starve if given a bone. In this case it's a bone held behind the back of the dogs owner and all the dog can do is imagine it.Oddy enough, I agree with you, but "Political Correctness" is the order of the day and all we can ever expect is "something has been done", a very dry bone rather than a juicy, meaty one![]()
but "Political Correctness" is the order of the day and all we can ever expect is "something has been done", a very dry bone rather than a juicy, meaty one![]()
Sadly, it is in the case of 'Naming & Shaming'i doubt pc is the reason...