go to Shinrarta Dezhra or Deciat in openmake it dangerous
go to Shinrarta Dezhra or Deciat in openmake it dangerous
We don't know their to do list, that's the problem. But here there are few suggestions.
I recently posted this about NPC Multicrew.
One FDEV could have show up and say "hey great idea, we will include it in our roadmap" or "Nice idea, but this takes a lot of effort and at the moment our pipeline is full".
IIRC they said more SRVs are on their to do list.Another one that gets always a lot of consents is new type of SRV's with specific roles and additional gameplay. FDEV could show up and say "while we cannot integrate all great suggestions here, I will push the team to release at least one new SRV for the end of the year!".
I don't think you can compare adding a new weapon to adding more exploration content, anyway they added "new phenomena or cool things to find" with almost every update since release.More exploration contents and things to find in the galaxy. It would be nice if with the small updates instead of realeasing only weapons they would release some new phenomena or cool things to find. I would expect something like "hey guys we have a couple of options for the next update: do you prefer a new weapon to kill Thargoids with some gameplay to unlock it or do you prefer a completely new stellar phenomana to discover in the galaxy?"
Another post that received a lot of thumbs up was the one where I showed improved system arrival from witch space and improved seamless transition from supercruise to normal flight approaching a starport. FDEV could've show up just to say "Hey nice improvement here. Improving the arrival transitions is not part of our near future release, but since many people seems to push for it we will see if we can find a place in our priority list" or "Nice ideas here, I will discuss with the team if we can put this somehere in our plan but don't expect anything soon because our prioirty list is already full of things that you will love for sure"
A few examples would be good. But I would probably agree anyway...There is also a megathread about small things that break immersion that has never been considered in the updates.
Not really, unless you assume that creating legs and atmospheric landings require the same amount of effort and time like the engineers did. Guardians and Thargoids on the other hand have been some of the most requested additions, which shows that their roadmap does reflect what the community wants. I believe the only feature that nobody asked for was CQC.Last but not least, Legs and atmospheric landings have been requested long before engineers, guardians and thargoids. Legs leaked but not confirmed and still no info about atmospheric planets. So this is a clear sign that they have a roadmap which do not interact with the community.
Yes and no. If it would be a true MMO it would probably be a better MMO but 50% of the players wouldn't like it. If it would be a true single player game it would probably be a better single player game but the other 50% woulnd't like it. Meanwhile I like that the game is both, although I am mostly interested in my personal narrative the shared universe gives me the feeling of belonging to a real world, while a 100% single player experience would get boring after 50 hours because I woulnd't have the feeling that I can do anything meaningful.I think most of this game's problems stem from FDev trying to be agreeable to everyone, resulting in a game that doesn't do either MMO or single player particularly well. I think the game would have been far better served if they'd picked one and just done it really well. Game design by public committee seems in retrospect, a very bad idea.
make it dangerous, we exit SC too close to stations,
I assume that introducing legs mechanics and atmospheric planets with dedicated gamplay would take 3 years of development, which was the duration of horizons + beyond.Not really, unless you assume that creating legs and atmospheric landings require the same amount of effort and time like the engineers did. Guardians and Thargoids on the other hand have been some of the most requested additions, which shows that their roadmap does reflect what the community wants. I believe the only feature that nobody asked for was CQC.
So basically no content updates at all for 3 years? Peope are already losing their mind over 2 years WITH regular content updates. The end result would probably be a better game, the question is if there would be a playerbase left to play it. Money would probably also be an issue.I assume that introducing legs mechanics and atmospheric planets with dedicated gamplay would take 3 years of development, which was the duration of horizons + beyond.
Consider also that guardians could have been a content much more enjoyable on legs with guardian structures and temples to be explored in first person rather than on a futuristic wheel chair (SRV) that stuck at every single rock.
The OP said one thing... not thousandsWhat,.........no more bugs.
Why,...........no more bugs.
How,...........fix the bugs.
There are other things I would like to change but this one is pretty high on my list.
So basically no content updates at all for 3 years? Peope are already losing their mind over 2 years WITH regular content updates. The end result would probably be a better game, the question is if there would be a playerbase left to play it. Money would probably also be an issue.
The OP said one thing... not thousands![]()
No, contents released little by little like they did with horizons.So basically no content updates at all for 3 years? Peope are already losing their mind over 2 years WITH regular content updates. The end result would probably be a better game, the question is if there would be a playerbase left to play it. Money would probably also be an issue.
I believe you are underestimating the effort it takes. You've just given them 6 months for atmospheric planets and another 6 months for space legs.No, contents released little by little like they did with horizons.
example:
Dec. 2015 Horizons
June 2016 Rocky and Ice planets with atmosphere
Dec 2016 Gas Giants, Volcanic planets with planetary mining
June 2017 Legs in stations and ships with new gameplay to interact with ships and modules (basic version of engineering where you are the engineer that modify your modules for additional boost)
Dec 2017 Dedicated missions and exploration contents for legs
June 2018 Thargoids (combat ship) and guardian (exploration on legs)
Dec 2018 HMC and WW with submarine SRV
June 2019 (wow now!): ELW and life on planets
I believe you are underestimating the effort it takes. You've just given them 6 months for atmospheric planets and another 6 months for space legs.