They had a forum poll when deciding on the transfer timers.
Sadly people voted the wrong way on that.
I seem to recall Tj rigged the poll 70/30 like he rigged all the polls.
They had a forum poll when deciding on the transfer timers.
Sadly people voted the wrong way on that.
FDEV could introduce it as a High Priority Poll and award ARX for completing each stage.
If people don't care about communication and a roadmap we don't need a petition to ask for it?uh.. how?
If people don't care about communication and a roadmap we don't need a petition to ask for it?
Sorry if that doesn't make sense, the last 51 pages have been exhausting...
What we need is Survey Lasers - we fly around the game, shooting random people. If they fire back with the 'I signed' mod then they count on one side, but if they have the 'I did not sign' they count on the other. Would need to force everyone into open to ensure Solo players aren't disadvantaged, but I'm sure fdev can fit this in as part of the new world order as specified in the OP.
Edit: Forgot - you would obviously need a 'what is happening?' laser option![]()
He's obviously unaware of the efficacy of the block function. Somebody should take it upon themselves to mention it gratuitously on the flimsiest of pretexts.
That's what I have been saying since 2000...OH no! Someone knows my email address and the fake name I gave them, lock up the kids, hunny!
You can stop with the FUD approach - this isn't America![]()
That would; however, be a more accurate measure of the community and its standing on what is in the petition.Then you would get a good segment of players who were never interested in communicating things like roadmaps, QA and CM responsibilities.
It's just click, honk, turn, scoop, click, honk, turn, scoop..If people don't care about communication and a roadmap we don't need a petition to ask for it?
Sorry if that doesn't make sense, the last 51 pages have been exhausting...
Maybe. I personally don't want my 15 fully loaded VO pimp wagons pilfered by some pipe fitter in sheep's clothing.Bringing out the SDC boogeyman is Joseph McCarthy levels of stupid. Wow.
That would; however, be a more accurate measure of the community and its standing on what is in the petition.
What we have is (on the open letter petition) is far closer to an echo chamber.
Which leaves the forum version the only place for people (again only a small part of the community) to voice dissent.
So what we actually have with the XXXXX number of votes is a self affirming closed letter, whether or not it is a good/bad list of concerns.
It all seems to be a way to create more division (regardless of the intent) in the community it is supposed to represent, that being the players of this game.
Its not though- its making sensors more important to the overall ship design rather than an afterthought. It could be extended to missiles or turrets, or anything in game that requires imaging or targetting. What about A grade having greater surface resolution when flying low? Or having C or E (or an experimental) that lowers your radars refresh 'ping' to make you less visible in SC at the expense of radar refresh times? The possibilities are endless and open up whole new avenues of possibility.
Have any apologists trotted out the argument that "When they don't communicate, everyone is upset, but when they DO communicate, everyone is still upset" yet?
I know a game that I really like from a company whose stuff I really like is getting a paid expansion in 2020. It's a definite purchase for me and I don't mind waiting (or delays or changes).
Happy end user with realistic expectations.