A kick in the nuts.
it would be a kick in the coconuts for sure, the same i feel about the lack of small seismic charges in the gameWouldn't it be a kick of FDev required full ADMIRAL or KING rank to purchase a Fleet Carrier? Discuss. o7
every supporter of the idea is my guess.I wonder how many respondents to this thread are only in favour of rank locking the FC behind a Full Admiral or King simply because they have already achieved that level?
I personally would just enjoy all the salt that it would produce!I wonder how many respondents to this thread are only in favour of rank locking the FC behind a Full Admiral or King simply because they have already achieved that level?
If the Farragut and Majestic class ships become Fleet Carriers too then maybe, otherwise can't see it happening.Wouldn't it be a kick of FDev required full ADMIRAL or KING rank to purchase a Fleet Carrier? Discuss. o7
Wouldn't it be a kick of FDev required full ADMIRAL or KING rank to purchase a Fleet Carrier? Discuss. o7
This ++++. I would automatically qualify with a rank lock and I still say no, no, no.No. No rank locks - I am against anything that forces a player down a particular path. Besides, mercs and indy groups have ambitions too, you know!
This ++++. I would automatically qualify with a rank lock and I still say no, no, no.
With a rebel yell?![]()
The loose wires are customization for secret Alliance functions.Yeah but with the Alliance it's either going to be De Lacy (half finished with loose wires hanging everywhere) or Lakon (huge glazed space resembling a green house)
Works for me, everyone starts out even-steven.The fleet carrier will be an Alliance ship, locked behind a rank grind worse than the other two, and you'll have to start at the beginning..
Meh! There are ways around the grind for rank. If you've got a load of cash lying around.The fleet carrier will be an Alliance ship, locked behind a rank grind worse than the other two, and you'll have to start at the beginning..