Data point: I was willing to spend money for paintjobs when I could see exactly what it would cost me. Since this ARX nonsense came in, I haven't spent anything at all
If FD provided a currency-to-Arx conversion table next to the item, it would defeat the purpose of Arx. Proof that it's a money grab.
I think the biggest problem with Arx is how it shows the prices of cosmetics, namely "how big is the number next to the item listing?"
To give an example, a 16-piece ship kit costs 13520 Arx compared to 12 USD in the old system. When someone first looks at the price listing in Arx, they see a number that is 3 orders of magnitude higher than it was under the old system. Even though it's actually cheaper to buy the ship kit with Arx (not that you would be able tell without looking it up), the first impression of "my god that's expensive" stays with the potential buyer. Even after they have spent some time with a calculator working out the actual price in their currency of choice, the shock of seeing a big number next to that group of pixels could very well make someone think twice about buying that extra paint job or name plate.
Yeah, it's a mess.Hmm, I dunno.
FD are ebil! They won't show us how much real money it costs to trap us into buying!
FD are incompetent! Their arx values are so high it discourages purchase!
Can't win either way. ¯\(ツ)/¯
What paintjobs fit on the Cobra MK IV?
I checked the ARX store on the website, but I can't find any. If anyone could help me out, I'd really appreciate it.
Yes, it's really black.I wanted Black paint for the Mamba, but 3250 is way too much.
Go on, I have to ask. Just how much time would you actually need to parse the question 'do I want to buy this shiny paintjob for my pretend space ship and can I afford to spend the life-changing amounts of money concerned?' Granted I'm a tax officer so I spend most of my working day doing mental artithmetic but I can't say I thought I was that far ahead of the average person in terms of my ability to work out whether I had a few quid to spare.
No, if you buy them now !Are you sure about the Stygian paint jobs being limited time only ?
Agree with the issue of time limited offers.Everyone thinks they are so conscious and clever but science say they (including you and me) are not. We are bombarded by marketing tactics 24/7, whenever you turn on the TV or open your browser. And the very goal of marketing is to convince people to spend their money on things they don't need, by making them think or feel that they indeed need them. Making something "limited" or "exclusive" is part of these tactics as they make the customers feel like they acquire something "special" or "rare", so they are more willing to spend premium on something, especially if it's limited time only. The harsh reality is that the only people who really don't spend money are those who don't have any.
To answer your question: Personally, I'd like the Stygian paintjobs to be permanent in the store. Why? Because I don't know which ship I'll use in the long run from now, whether I'll go fighting, exploring, mining or anything. Right now I don't play the game regularly because of other obligations, thus I'd like more time to think about which colour to buy to which ship. I have the money and I'd be happy to spend a little bit on such a nice paintjob. But since I can't decide I'll probably won't buy any of them, because chances are it could turn out I chose the wrong colour, the wrong ship, or both. And this is where marketing comes in - by making these paintjobs limited time the game actually encourages me to buy more so I can decide later which to use. And I'll end up with other, obsolete paintjobs. I don't like this artificial time pressure so in the end I personally decided not to buy anything. When Black Friday and the holidays are over we'll all forget the "hype" and I'll have my money instead of paintjobs I don't use. (And before you ask, even the price of a paintjob matters to me, that's how my life is, unfortunately.)
The free Arx system fails here, too, because even 1 paintjob costs 9 weeks of active gameplay, and that is to someone who gets the 400 Arx every week. Anyone who participated in the Interstellar Initiatives, for example, probably don't have that much since trading doesn't give you anything.
Yeah comparing FDev with SCS is almost a bit cruel - I consider the latter as the CDPR of the simworld.Yeah its bit of a non event for me. Though i think i just found a lead.. my newest account doesn't have a covas, im 300 arx short of being able to get one with the cheapest pack. Time to do some road to riches it think.
It was a bit of a dumbness shock how you've got your wallet out to throw at them and they made it harder for you to do them the favor. Mind blown.
I also play elite in hours more than the truck simulators, but SCS are wise enough not to pee people off. I haven't invested much in ets because the dlcs are more expensive, theres so many to catch up on (the audio is worse and i hate autobarn driving) but with ats i get all the dlc the moment its released. Maybe its because i happily pay frontier, but i can't give them a white knight pass when they're being absolute crap about their own game.... for the last 2 years. Its going to be a rude shock to the 3 people participating in the current beta just how well frontier "listen" to their feedback. Its going just like the past ones i participated in so far.
Also frontier... metallic BLACK.. not night before metallic recolor![]()
Same here.Data point: I was willing to spend money for paintjobs when I could see exactly what it would cost me. Since this ARX nonsense came in, I haven't spent anything at all